MSM7045 The Global Economy: International Trade and Finance WRIT1 Assessment Brief S1 2025/26

Published: 30 Oct, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Finance
University Cardiff Metropolition University (CMU) Module Title MSM7045 The Global Economy: International Trade and Finance
Academic Year 2025/26

MSM7045 The Global Economy: International Trade and Finance Assessment Brief

Contents

  • Assessment Details
  • Submission Details
  • Assessment Criteria
  • Further Information
  • Who can answer questions about my assessment?
  • Referencing and independent learning
  • Technical submission problems
  • Late submission and mitigating circumstances
  • Academic Misconduct
  • How is my work graded?

Assessment Details

Assessment title Abr. Weighting
The Global Economy Today WRIT1 100%
Pass marks are 40% for undergraduate work and 50% for postgraduate work unless stated otherwise.

Task/Assessment brief:

Consider the following task.

For this work you are required to conduct a scoping review which aims to identify, map, and synthesize the existing literature on the multifaceted challenges currently facing the global economy—including economic, social, political, environmental, and technological dimensions. 

The aim of this assessment is to investigate, analyse, and critically evaluate such a review, and evaluate the extent of the threat posed to the global economy.  

You are to do this in two parts.

Part One.

In this part you are to create what we call a PRISMA-ScR template, into which you will review and consider this area of study.  Part One will constitute 25% of the total mark and be approximately 1000 words or equivalent in length.

Part Two. This part is split into three sections.

  • Section 1. In this section you are to conduct a thematic analysis of ten articles identified in Part One and explore the wider implications of the themes for the future of the global economic system.  This will constitute 35% of the total mark and be approximately 1500 words in length.
  • Section 2. In this section you are to conduct a reflection on your use of AI and digital scholarship in the development of your answer to Section 1 above.  This will constitute 25% of the total mark and be approximately 750 words in length.
  • Section 3. In this section you are to provide an evaluation of the PRISMA-ScR scoping methodology, identifying its strength and weaknesses relating to your experiences of using this method, and a consideration of the thematic method used in the assessment process identified in Section 1 above. This will constitute 15% of the total mark and be approximately 750 words in length.

Do You Need MSM7045 Assignment of This Question

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Further Detail

Below is set out in more detail what each part and section of this work requires.  Please note that workshops will be given to support the development of tools, skills and techniques for all elements of this assessment.  For these sessions, please see the module handbook for more details.

Part One. (25%)

In Workshops 1 and 2 you will be introduced to the scoping review process and the PRISMA-ScR template you are required to submit for part one of this assessment.  In this planning stage you will work in groups and cover much of what you will be required to consider. 
The PRISMA-ScR template can be found in the assessment folder within the modules Moodle pages.

Part Two (75%)

Section 1 (35%).  Conduct a thematic analysis of your ten articles drawing out themes and connections that help you address and better understand the problems faced by the global economic system.  You are expected to not only use your ten articles in this analysis, but draw on wider reading to support, substantiate and develop your arguments.  As stated, this section should be approximately 1500 words.

Section 2 (25%).  As part of this assessment, you are required to make explicit and reflect upon the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, etc.) as part of your research and writing process.

The 750-word commentary required for this section should include:

-Which AI tools were used and why?
-Examples of prompts and brief excerpts of responses.
-Reflections on how AI outputs were adapted or challenged.
-Offer insight into the value and limitations of AI in your learning and writing process.

Section 3 (15%). As stated, this section requires you to evaluate the scoping review and thematic analysis methodology.  What is critical here is that you reflect on your use and demonstrate through your experience the strengths and weaknesses of this methodology, it is not sufficient to simply identify strengths and weaknesses in a purely theoretical context.

Summary

Part

Section

Element Description

Weighting

Word Count

Workshop Support

One

Step 1 & 2

Preparation & Article Collection

 

-

Workshops 1and 2 – Article data bases, and using PRISMA-ScR

 

Step 3 & 4

Create Systematic Review Template, and review 5 articles

 

 

 

Step 5 Submission

Combination of steps 1 and 2 above (500-word summary) + Step 4 completed template

25%

Approx. 1000 words equivalent

 

Two

Section 1

Thematic analysis of 10 articles, with wider implications for the global economic system

35%

Approx. 1500 words

Workshop 6 – Doing Thematic Analysis

 

Section 2

Reflective commentary on use of AI and digital scholarship

25%

Approx. 750 words

Workshop 7 – Effective use of AI

 

Section 3

Evaluation of the systematic review/thematic analysis methodology based on personal experience

15%

Approx. 750 words

 

Word count (or equivalent): 4000

This a reflection of the effort required for the assessment. Word counts will normally include any text, tables, calculations, figures, subtitles and citations. Reference lists and contents of appendices are excluded from the word count. Contents of appendices are not usually considered when determining your final assessment grade.

Academic or technical terms explained:

Scoping Review

A scoping review is a type of literature review that aims to map the existing research on a broad topic or area of interest. It is especially useful when a topic is complex or has not been reviewed comprehensively before. 

Full instruction on how to conduct such a review will be given.

Submission Details

Submission Deadline:

Submission is split into two parts.  Part 1 06/11/25, and Part 2 18/12/25

Estimated Feedback

Return Date

This will normally be 20 working days after final submission.  Formative feedback will be given on Part 1

Submission

Time:

By 4.00pm on the deadline day.

 

Moodle/Turnitin:

Any assessments submitted after the deadline will not be marked and will be recorded as a non-attempt unless you have had an extension request agreed or have approved mitigating circumstances. See the School Moodle pages for more information on extensions and mitigating circumstances.

File Format:

The assessment must be submitted as a pdf document (save the document as a pdf in your software) and submit through the Turnitin submission point in Moodle.

Your assessment should be titled with your: 

student ID number, module code and assessment ID, e.g. st12345678 BHL5007 WRIT1

Late Submission Window Eligibility

Where submissions are eligible for the late-submission window this will be communicated in the relevant assessment submission point within Moodle.

Feedback

Feedback for the assessment will be provided electronically via Moodle. Feedback will be provided with comments on your strengths and the areas which you can improve. View the guidance on how to access your feedback.

All marks are provisional and are subject to quality assurance processes and confirmation at the programme Examination Board.

MSM7045 Assessment Criteria

Learning outcomes assessed

The following learning outcomes are assessed (see Module document)

  • Identify a range of issues facing the global economy. (LO1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
  • Critically analyse a range of threats and evaluate their implications for the global system and its performance. (LO1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
  • Critically reflect upon the use of AI and how it can be used effectively to aid learning and develop arguments. (LO6)
  • Evaluate the use of research methodology and reflect upon its application to help us better understand the world around us. (LO6)

Other skills/attributes developed

This includes elements of the Cardiff Met EDGE (Ethical, Digital, Global and Entrepreneurial skills) and other attributes developed in students through the completion of the module and assessment. These will also be highlighted in the module guidance, which should be read by all students completing the module. Assessments are not just a way of auditing student knowledge. They are a process which provides additional learning and development through the preparation for and completion of the assessment.

The following skills are developed in this assessment

Digital.  How was AI used?
-Which AI tools were used and why?
-Examples of prompts and brief excerpts of responses.
-Reflections on how AI outputs were adapted or challenged.
-Offer insight into the value and limitations of AI in your learning and writing process.
Entrepreneurial - Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.  How to analyses and evaluate information is an important skill graduates need to perform effectively in the workplace.  This module provides the opportunity to develop such a knowledge of data collection methodology, and requires students to reflect upon its use and application.

Marking/Assessment Criteria

Level 7

80%-100% (Distinction+)

70%-79% (Distinction)

60%-69% (Merit)

50%-59% (Pass)

Below 49% (Fail)

Overall summary

Excellent (80-89%) or outstanding and exceptional (90-100%)

Beyond level 7

Worthy of publication

Very good

 

 

Good

 

Threshold

 

Not met some learning outcomes/assessment criteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Knowledge & Understanding (20%)

Exceptional mastery of subject/research

 

Subject knowledge and understanding full and detailed. Mastery demonstrated

Can extend, transform and apply knowledge 

Awareness of limitations of knowledge

Sophisticated discussion

Independent thinking and action.

Original insights

Full subject knowledge and understanding. Mastery demonstrated

Can extend, transform and apply knowledge

Discussion of complex concepts is often tackled successfully

Some independent thinking and action

Basic but secure subject knowledge and understanding. Mastery demonstrated

Frequently descriptive and based on given sources

Limited independent thinking and action 

Limited subject knowledge and understanding

Factual inaccuracies, errors and misconceptions in important areas

Irrelevant content

 

Presentation and communication (10%)

Eloquent and professional style

Coherent and succinct

Presentation standard high

Logically organised

Arguments are well-defined and clearly articulated

Clear and succinct

Well presented

Appropriately organised

Well-articulated

Satisfactory communication

Lacks academic rigour

Describing and reporting factual information

Appropriately structured

Confused and clumsily expressed.

Unclear

 

Analysis & discussion (30%)

Extensive and independent enquiry to solve problems 

Detailed analysis and critical enquiry

Expertise in highly specialised and advanced technical, professional and/or research skills

Highly successful in presenting, synthesising and commenting on research process and outcomes

Insight on the relationship between theory and practice

Some detailed analysis and critical enquiry

Expertise in highly specialised and advanced technical, professional and/or research skills

Considerable success in presenting and commenting on research process and outcomes

Some linkage between theory and practice

Some limited analysis and critical enquiry

Limited expertise in highly specialised and advanced technical, professional and/or research skills

Some success in presenting and commenting on research process and outcomes

 

 

Some enquiry/analysis but research process and outcomes may be naïve, simplistic and/or unconvincing

Research / scholarship (10%)

Insight and critical awareness of research/scholarship

Substantial range of reference citations, beyond expectations

Detailed, thorough knowledge and systematic understanding of current research/advanced scholarship

The use of scholarly reviews/primary sources is sophisticated

Referencing accurate and reading/investigation beyond sources provided

Ability to determine, refine, adapt and use research knowledge and skills

Thorough knowledge and understanding of current research/scholarship

Ability to design research/apply methods/knowledge/skills

The referencing almost always accurate and reading/investigation beyond sources provided

Ability to determine, refine, adapt and use research knowledge and skills

Some knowledge of research/scholarship/application of methods/skills and their implications

Some errors in referencing

Over-reliance on given sources

Limited or sporadic knowledge of research/scholarship

Application largely unsuccessful

Frequent errors in the referencing

Over-reliance on programme materials

 

Structured argument and critical evaluation(20%)

May challenge the boundaries of knowledge

Innovative and/or creative thinking

New insights informed through critical evaluation

Critical evaluation and informed judgements

Clear recognition of the complexities of academic debate.

Arguments are well developed, sustained and substantiated

Appropriate and sometimes innovative solutions are offered to problems

There is strong evidence of effective reflection on student’s practice and consideration for future development  

Critical evaluation and reflection

Arguments are clearly considered and substantiated

Appropriate judgements and solutions offered to problems  

Ability to reflect on student’s practice and plan future development

Limited ability to critically evaluate and reflect

Arguments substantiated but under-developed

Descriptive and factual presentation favoured

Limited and superficial reflection with little consideration for future development

Little evidence of critical evaluation and reflection

Arguments rarely substantiated

Largely descriptive

Self-evaluation and reflections are extremely limited

AI Use & Digital Scholarship (10%)

Sophisticated and reflective integration of AI tools. Outstanding critical evaluation of AI-generated content. Demonstrates excellent insight into limitations, bias, relevance, and use of AI as an augmentative tool. Commentary is rich, transparent, and well-connected to the academic content.

Very good use of AI tools, well-documented and purposefully applied. Strong reflection and appropriate differentiation between AI-generated and student-authored content. Demonstrates critical thinking about AI’s academic value and limitations.

Clear use of AI tools with some reflective insight. Commentary acknowledges relevance, utility, and limitations, but analysis is somewhat surface-level. AI use complements student input but may lack depth in critical judgement.

AI tools may be used but without meaningful evaluation. Commentary is descriptive rather than analytical. Limited awareness of the boundaries and implications of AI use.

Unacknowledged, inappropriate, or over-reliant AI use. Lack of critical engagement. Commentary missing, inadequate, or fails to meet expectations. Risk of academic misconduct or poor scholarly judgement.

Hire Experts to solve MSM7045 Assignment Before Deadline

Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

Having trouble with your MSM7045 The Global Economy: International Trade and Finance Assignment? Our dedicated services provide online assignment help in the UK specifically designed for students seeking assistance with assignments. Our UK Assignment experts are committed to guiding you through your coursework, ensuring personalized support for your academic success. We also provide free Cardiff Metropolitan University Assignment Samples.Trust our team to deliver original work and leverage our extensive experience. Contact us today to simplify your academic journey and reach your educational objectives with confidence.

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

BUS105 Statistics Assignment Sample Solution Docx | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: Statistics (BUS105)

View Free Samples

MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics Assignment Sample Answer

Category: Assignment

Subject: Marketing

University: Singapore University of Socical Sciences

Module Title: MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics

View Free Samples

ELT201 Understanding Poetry SUSS Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: English

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: ELT201 Understanding Poetry

View Free Samples

BUS354 Customer Relationship Management Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: BUS354 Customer Relationship Management

View Free Samples

ICT239 Web Application Development Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Computer Science

University: Singapore University of Social Science (SUSS)

Module Title: ICT239 Web Application Development

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK