| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | BPP University Business School | Module Title | Consultancy Project Proposal |

By completing this assessment, you will demonstrate the following learning outcomes (LOs):
The formative is a 1000-word assignment introducing the selected organisation facing a current business/management issue and outlining the research methodology designed to investigate the business issue.
Task 1: Critical discussion of challenges
Please provide background information on your chosen organisation and critically explore between 1 and 3 challenges. Please support your discussions with relevant sources.
Get Answer of MSc Management Consultancy Project Proposal Formative Assessment before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentTask 2: Identify the research aim and objectives and provide application of research methodology Indicate your research aim and three research objectives, connected to the context of your research.
Demonstrate an awareness of research methodologies and provide application of your research methodology to the selected challenges. Please select secondary research only and use both qualitative and quantitative methods for your research.
Your report structure should include the following sections:
Consultancy Project Proposal (1,000-word)
Word count – only applies to the main body (shown in bold); i.e., cover page, table of content, list of abbreviations, references and appendix are not part of the 1,000-word count.
If you have any further questions about this coursework assignment, please contact the module leader/ your tutor or attend a drop-in session with the module leader.
|
Module Learning Outcome |
Fail (0-39%) |
Low Fail (40-49%) |
Pass (50-59%) |
Merit (60-69%) |
Distinction (70-79%) |
High Distinction (80- 100%) |
|
LO1: Critically discuss a current organisational issue or business challenge |
Weak and incorrect discussions on the chosen organisation. The selected organisation is not appropriate. Lacks exploration of any current challenge or the challenge(s) are not relevant. Outdated sources are used as evidence. |
Limited knowledge and appreciation of the context of the selected organisation. Limited identification and discussion of current challenges. Challenges are not supported by recent sources i.e. current or previous year. Limited critical discussion is present when discussing the challenges. |
Satisfactory approach which demonstrates some awareness of the organisational background. Satisfactory academic/intellect ual skills. Some relevant challenge(s) are identified however the discussion lacks elements of criticality. Satisfactory evidence is used for the discussions. |
Good knowledge base, exploring the context of the selected organisation. Good critical discussion of current challenges which clearly link to current affairs/ news events/ Sustainability Development Goals. Good critical discussion is provided, supported with citations. Good evidence is provided to support your discussions |
Excellent knowledge of the selected organisation’s background with evidence of extensive research. Detailed presentation and critical exploration of challenges which clearly link to current affairs/ news events/ Sustainability Development Goals and these are connected to the research aim/ objectives/ questions. Excellent evidence is provided to support your discussions and demonstrates thorough evidence of external reading. |
Outstanding knowledge of the selected organisation’s background with evidence of extensive research. Outstanding knowledge base, exploring and critically analysing challenges. Multiple links provided to current affairs/ news events/ Sustainability Development Goals as well as outstanding links to the research aim/ objectives/ questions. Extensive use of a wide range of sources demonstrating strong evidence of research and external reading. The submission can be used as an outstanding exemplar. |
|
LO2: Identify and articulate research aims and objectives and apply relevant research methodology to a selected organisational issue or business challenge. |
Weak research aim and objectives identified. Weak knowledge and application of research methodology with no links to the selected challenges. |
Limited presentation of the research aim and objectives and these lack clarity and focus. Demonstrates limited awareness and application of research methodologies and no links to the challenges (minimum of one and the maximum of three challenges). Demonstrates limited evidence of external reading and research. |
Satisfactory work with identification of one research aim, and three objectives. Demonstrates satisfactory awareness and application of research methodologies relevant to the selected challenges (minimum of one and the maximum of three challenges). Satisfactory evidence is used in the discussions. |
Well-written research aim, three objectives and research question(s) provided which logically link to one another. Demonstrates solid awareness and application of research methodologies, clearly linked to the selected challenges (minimum of one and the maximum of three challenges). Good evidence and examples are used to support the application. |
Excellent approach demonstrated when outlining the research aim, three objectives and questions which are coherent and logical. Demonstrates excellent awareness and application of research methodologies, clearly linked to the selected challenges (minimum of one and the maximum of three challenges). Shows evidence of strong critical thinking skills. An excellent range of evidence/ examples are used. |
Detailed and precise approach demonstrated when outlining the research aim, three objectives and questions. Demonstrates outstanding awareness and application of research methodologies with outstanding links to the selected challenges (minimum of one and the maximum of three challenges). Outstanding critical thinking skills presented. Demonstrates outstanding evidence of research and external reading and provides outstanding evidence/ examples. The submission can be used as an outstanding exemplar. |
|
Academic Skills |
Inadequate or weak academic/intellectu al skills with many difficulties. Demonstrates weak evidence of research skills and uses outdated sources. |
Limited academic/intellectu al skills. Demonstrates limited personal reflection and evidence-based critique. Limited evidence of research and external reading and/or uses outdated sources as evidence. |
Satisfactory academic/intellect ual skills. Satisfactory reflection and judgements forming from evidence-based critique. Satisfactory research skills using relevant and recent sources to support the discussions. |
Good academic/intellectu al skills. Demonstrates good intellectual originality and imagination. Good research skills using a range of credible, recent and relevant sources. |
Excellent academic/intellectual skills. Excellent research skills drawing on a wide range of external sources and excellent evidence of external reading. |
Outstanding academic/intellectual skills. Outstanding research skills and exemplary evidence of external reading and research. |
|
Structure and References |
No references or weak use of Harvard referencing method with errors or inconsistencies. Inadequate structure, expression and significant faults in the presentation. |
Limited use of Harvard referencing method with minor errors. Limited structure and expression, with some faults in the presentation. |
Satisfactory use of the Harvard referencing method with appropriate references. Satisfactory structure, expression and presentation. Demonstrates good presentation skills. |
Good use of Harvard referencing. Well- structured layout and accurate expression. Good writing skills adapted to suit all situations and audiences. |
Excellent use of the Harvard referencing method. Excellent structure and layout, as well as accurate expression. Excellent writing skills adapted to suit all situations and audiences. Evidence of excellent presentation skills with no or very minor faults. |
Outstanding use of the Harvard referencing method. Wide use of journals articles, company reports and the latest research. Outstanding structure and layout with exemplary expression. Outstanding writing skills adapted to suit all situations and audiences. Exemplary presentation skills with no faults. |
Achieve Higher Grades of MSc Management Consultancy Project Proposal Formative Assessment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you looking BPP University Assignment Help for your MSc Management Consultancy Project Proposal assessment? Don't worry, there's no need! We're here to help you with your assignments. Whether you need management assignment help or well-designed solutions, we'll provide you with everything. You'll find free BPP University Assignment Samples Examples that will strengthen your study materials. With our expert team providing all assignment services, you'll receive accurate, clear, and original content. Stop worrying about your marks and complete your assignments hassle-free with expert support. So what are you waiting for? Join us now and make your study journey easier!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content