| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of West London | Module Title | MS70121E Competitive Strategy & Innovation |
Strategic management decisions are the cornerstone of every organisation, be they private businesses, public sector organisations or not-for-profit charities. Faced with constant technological disruption, managers now must make decisions in an uncertain and complex environment. They must rapidly re-evaluate strategic priorities in order to remain competitive and profitable; it requires managers to be able to connect data to strategy.
Strategic analysis and predictive frameworks together with latest Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools enable managers to spot potential opportunities and threats and make better decisions faster. By making the right decision, integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations into strategic management and utilizing AI-driven insights, managers can drive both innovation and sustainability, positioning their company for long-term success.
This module aims to provide students with valuable knowledge and insights on competitive strategy for companies becoming more resilient in face of disruption, through developing their individual strengths in helping organisations become more agile and enabling them to grow into vehicles for innovation.
On this Competitive Strategy and Innovation module you will develop an in-depth understanding of the latest concepts in strategy and innovation, with a focus on business growth and innovation.
Learn the knowledge and skills to develop and manage new products, services and business models utilizing innovation and gain the tools needed to drive strategy and innovation within an organisation. And further recognise the importance of sustainable practices and responsible innovation in achieving long-term competitive advantage.
This module inspires you to develop business strategies based on your organisation’s unique resources and position in the current market. The content will examine how your value proposition can offer a competitive advantage through continuous innovation and embedding ESG principles. You will learn about various models and frameworks that can be used to understand the current competitive position and inform your strategy. By the end of the course, you'll have designed a plan to nurture consistent innovation to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
Face-to-face classroom-based sessions: The following topics are analysed through participants’ discussion of real business cases and simulations:
Independent learning includes time engaged with essential and further reading materials, revision, research activity, case study and assignment preparation and completion, critically reflection on own experience and advanced topics and applicability to real-world settings.
Please refer to your Course Handbook for a detailed outline of how this module forms part of the overall course.
Specific expectations students can have of tutors:
Specific expectations tutors will have of students:
A key part of your learning will be preparation for your summative assessment. You will be provided feedback on your formative assessments, and this will help you to better understand what is required of you when you submit your summative assessment. Please see below guidance on your formative assessment and how to access your feedback.
Innovations are crucial for a business organisation to sustain its position in the market. You are required to undertake a strategic analysis of a selected firm of your choice from any industry and discuss the innovative trends, strategy, organisational environment, and value creation in the context of your chosen firm.
The assessment for this module is a portfolio consisting of the following elements:
E1 - Portfolio Element One: Group Presentation
E2 - Portfolio Element Two: Group Report
E3 - Portfolio Element Three: Individual Reflection
The portfolio assignment requires you to undertake a detailed strategic analysis covering the business model of a selected firm of your choice form any industry. You will carry out research to collect secondary information and use appropriate strategy tools to analyse both external environment and internal characteristics of the chosen firm as well as identify and analyse the main business model, key innovations and recommend strategic direction for future.
Students could utilize AI tools (like Generative AI platforms, Idea Generators, or AI-based market research tools) to identify trends, customer needs, or gaps in the market as well as performing a deep dive into the competitor’s strategy, strengths, and weaknesses. All work carried out with the help of AI tools should be clearly indicated in the assessment works produced.
You are required to attempt all elements to achieve an overall mark of at least 50% to pass the module. Your work must be submitted electronically via Turnitin according to a published schedule on blackboard. To achieve an overall pass, the weighted average must be 50% or more. That is overall mark: (E1 x 0.3) + (E2 x 0.6) + (E3 x 0.1) ≥ 50 percent
|
Type of assessment |
Module learning outcome |
Word count or equivalent |
Due date (week no.) |
Pass mark |
Weighting |
|
Portfolio |
1,2,3,4,5 |
3000 |
14 |
50% |
100% |
|
Portfolio Elements: |
|||||
|
Element 1: Group Presentation. |
1,3,4 |
500 (equivalent) |
12-14 |
|
30% |
|
Element 2: Group Report |
2,3,4,5 |
2000 |
14 |
|
60% |
|
Element 3: Critical self- evaluation statement |
1 |
500 |
14 |
|
10% |
Struggling with your MS70121E Competitive Strategy & Innovation Assignment?
Request to Buy Answer|
Assessment |
Teaching Weeks in which Assessment Support Takes Place |
Outline of Type and Form of Assessment Support to be Provided |
Student Preparation Required Prior to or After the Support Session |
How will the Support Session to be Delivered |
|
Element 1: Group Presentation. |
Week 7-11 |
Feedback on presentation via pre-arranged slots |
Provide the work to the teaching staff for review |
Face-to face |
|
Element 2: Group Report |
Week 10-14 |
Feedback on reports via pre- arranged slots |
Provide the work to the teaching staff for review |
Face-to face |
|
Element 3: Critical self-evaluation statement |
Week 14 |
Feedback on reports via pre- arranged slots |
Provide the work to the teaching staff for review |
Face-to face |
|
Assessment title |
Group Presentation |
|
Submission date and time |
Weeks 12-14 Scheduled class Time - TBC |
|
Word Count (or equivalent) |
15-20 Minutes 15 minutes presentation and 5 minutes questions |
|
Where to submit |
Presentations In class and turnitin slides submission |
|
Feedback date |
Feedback on Blackboard by 15 working days after submission |
|
Assessment Weighting |
30% |
This is a practice-based group project, where you will be part of a small group of not more than five participants.
Undertake a strategic analysis covering both macro and micro examination of a selected firm of your choice form any industry. You will carry out research to collect secondary information and use appropriate strategy tools to analyse both external environment and internal characteristics of the chosen firm as well as identify and analyse the main business models.
Based on your strategic analysis, identify a set of strategies for the firm for next five years. Aligning with the new strategies, you should also recommend new or modified business models to exploit opportunities within the context of innovation and technological disruption.
Your team is required to deliver a presentation of 10-15 slides on your findings for the task above. The in-class assessment includes a 15-minute main presentation plus 5 minutes for Q&A. All members of the team are expected to be present and to participate in the actual presentation
|
Marking criteria for group research and presentation |
|
|
Marking Scheme |
Marks |
|
Overall Presentation: • Relevance of topic to the brief • Comprehensiveness of the analysis • Coherently structured • Appropriate dress code • Ability to engage the audience |
25% |
|
Research: • Issues are clearly evaluated • Essential information elicited from the data • Evidence of understanding the data • Critical analysis of relevant theories and concepts. • Application of theory to practice • Research is appropriate • Sources of research are evident |
50% |
|
Communication: • Ability to communicate clearly the concepts and theories used • Appropriate use of visual/print materials • Communication of essential information • Addressing audiences’ questions or issues raised • Appropriate use of language |
25% |
|
Total Presentation mark |
100% |
| 1 | Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the fundamental concepts and models of strategic decision-making and business models. | E1 |
| 3 | Evaluate strategic options and associated risks in each or chosen context. | E1 |
| 4 | Create or shape organisational vision to foster creativity and entrepreneurship, while recognising practical challenges to effective implementation | E1 |
This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment:
|
Assessment title |
Group Report |
|
Submission date and time |
Friday 16 January 2026, Midnight |
|
Word Count (or equivalent) |
2000 |
|
Where to submit |
S60%ubmitted via Turnitin |
|
Feedback date |
Feedback on Blackboard by 15 working days after submission |
|
Assessment Weighting |
This element of portfolio is an executive innovation strategy report highlighting your findings and recommendations on the element 1 task above. This is a practice-based group project, where you will be part of the same group as E1.
Your report should include recommendations for the chosen company to nurture consistent innovation to create a sustainable competitive advantage. Your report should also incorporate ESG considerations, making recommendations for how the chosen company can leverage ESG to sustain long-term growth and innovation.
|
Knowledge and Understanding |
30 |
21 – 30 |
11– 20 |
0 - 10 |
|
Demonstrates a clear understanding of a range of topics. Is able to answer questions confidently |
|
Demonstrates a detailed knowledge and understanding the issues and is able to confidently answer questions relating to these |
Demonstrates a good level of knowledge and understanding the issues and is able to answer most questions relating to these. |
Shows a limited knowledge and understanding the issues. Struggles to answer questions relating to these. |
|
Recommendations |
30 |
21 – 30 |
11– 20 |
0 - 10 |
|
Realistic and sensible recommendations are made stemming logically from the analysis. Recommendations are fully viable, compelling and persuasive. |
|
There is an excellent logic to the way in which recommendations stem from the analysis. Recommendations are fully viable, compelling and persuasive. |
There is a sound logic to the way in which recommendations stem from the analysis. Recommendations are viable, compelling and persuasive. |
There is some logic to the way in which recommendations stem from the analysis. Recommendations may not be fully viable and are not very persuasive. |
|
Synthesis and Creativity |
20 |
15 – 20 |
9 – 14 |
0 - 8 |
|
Information is presented in a clear and concise manner. Complex issues and ideas are presented clearly and in a visually appealing manner. |
|
An extremely well presented piece of work which clearly shows the links between the various concepts and ideas. There is a clear appreciation of the complexity of issues and these are presented in a clear manner. |
Well-presented piece of work which shows the links between the various concepts and ideas. There is an appreciation of the complexity of issues and these are presented |
Acceptable standard of presentation. The links between different concepts and ideas are shown. There is some appreciation of the complexity of issues. |
|
Organisation and Coherence |
10 |
7 – 10 |
4 – 6 |
0 - 3 |
|
The ideas are clearly structured and presented Clear grammar and accurate spelling and referencing |
|
A very clear structure and logical organisation. Good spelling and grammar |
Some attention paid to the structure and organisation. Meaning clear. Spelling and/or grammar needs some improvement |
Poor organisation and structure. Vague, over simplistic, or not focused. Poor spelling and grammar |
|
ESG Considerations |
10 |
7 – 10 |
4 – 6 |
0 - 3 |
|
Effectiveness in integrating ESG considerations into the strategic recommendations, including analysis of potential impacts on the company’s long-term sustainability and competitive position |
|
Thorough integration of ESG factors into the strategic analysis, with clear and compelling recommendations that enhance both sustainability and competitive advantage. Strong evidence of understanding the impact of ESG on long-term business success. |
ESG factors are integrated into the strategic analysis with relevant recommendations, showing a good understanding of the role of ESG in business strategy. Some minor gaps in analysis or recommendations. |
Limited or superficial integration of ESG factors, with recommendations that are either generic or lack depth. The impact of ESG on strategy is not clearly articulated. |
| No. | Learning Outcome | Marking Criteria |
| 2 | Critical understanding of the application of strategic management and business modelling in an environment driven by innovation and technical disruption | E2 |
| 3 | Evaluate strategic options and associated risks in a range of different context. | E2 |
| 4 | Create or shape organisational vision to foster creativity and innovation, while recognising practical challenges to effective implementation | E2 |
| 5 | Generate, evaluate, and apply new ideas and concepts in business strategy and innovation management. | E2 |
This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment:
| Assessment title | Critical self-evaluation statement |
| Submission date and time | Friday 16 January 2026, Midnight |
| Word Count (or equivalent) | 500 |
| Where to submit | Submitted via Turnitin |
| Feedback date | Feedback on Blackboard by 15 working days after submission |
| Assessment Weighting | 10% |
Critically evaluate one’s effectiveness at collaboration and leadership; and identify areas for further development with respect to your experience of working in groups and overall experience gained on the module.
You are required to write a short self-reflection report of not more than 500 words to focus on the following main topics related to learning on this module:
|
Assessment Topics |
Maximum Marks |
|
Understanding my strengths in a team working environment |
20 |
|
My perspectives regarding conflict management within a team |
20 |
|
How I have collaborated within the team |
20 |
|
How did I contribute towards building an inclusive culture? |
20 |
|
How AI supported my learning. |
20 |
|
Total |
100 |
|
Marks awarded |
80%+ |
70-80% |
60-70% |
50-60% |
Less than 50% |
|
Team working skills and conflict management 40 marks |
Exceptional Quality and detail of the evidence provided. |
Excellent Quality and detail of the evidence provided. |
Good Quality and detail of the evidence provided. |
Satisfactory evidence provided for the team working and conflict management |
Inadequate evidence provided for the team working and conflict management |
|
Collaboration and inclusive culture 40 marks |
Exceptional and critical reflection of inclusive cultural issues at work leading to improved competencies. |
Excellent critical reflection of inclusive cultural issues at work leading to improved competencies. |
Good demonstration of inclusive cultural issues work at improving competencies. |
Satisfactory demonstration of critical reflection on cultural issues work at improving competencies. |
Inadequate demonstration the team working and conflict management. |
|
AI Influence in learning.
Standard of academic writing 20 marks |
Exceptional critical analysis of how AI influenced their understanding and application of competitive strategy and innovation. Demonstration of exceptional academic writing completely free of any spelling or grammatical errors. |
Excellent critical analysis of how AI influenced their understanding and application of competitive strategy and innovation Demonstration of excellent academic writing completely free of any spelling or grammatical errors. |
Good critical analysis of how AI influenced their understanding and application of competitive strategy and innovation Demonstration of good academic writing with few spelling or grammatical errors. |
Adequate critical analysis of how AI influenced their understanding and application of competitive strategy and innovation. Satisfactory demonstration of academic writing some spelling or |
Inadequate critical analysis of how AI influenced their understanding and application of competitive strategy and innovation Inadequate demonstration of academic writing with poor spelling or major grammatical errors. |
This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment:
|
No. |
Learning Outcome |
Marking Criteria |
|
1 |
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the fundamental concepts and models of strategic decision-making, including an understanding of the application of simulations and game-theory in strategic decision-making. |
E3 |
Academic Integrity means avoiding plagiarism and cheating and owning your own work, the unauthorised use of essay mills and AI content is also considered academic misconduct. This is when you submit a piece of work which is not completely your own, but which you are presenting as your own without acknowledging the author or properly referencing the original source. All your work must demonstrate Academic Integrity; it must be an honest and fair submission, complying with all the requirements of the assessment. Failure to meet these standards of behaviour and practice is academic misconduct, which can result in penalties being applied under the Academic Offences Regulations.
You should always try your best to submit your work on time. If your circumstances mean that you are not able to submit on time or are unable to attend an in-person assessment like an exam or in- class test, then you can request Exceptional circumstances for the assessment. An extension allows you to submit coursework up to 10 calendar days late without penalty, (calendar days include all weekends and bank holidays where the University is open). Without an extension, the maximum mark you will be able to get for that work will be the pass mark. Mitigation allows you a mitigated attempt without penalty if you fail an assessment or do not submit.
You can apply for an extension or mitigation by self-certifying that you have exceptional circumstances which affected your ability to undertake the assessment. Self-certifying means that evidence does not have to be provided, although the University reserves the right to request evidence. All self-certified requests must be made before the deadline and detail the exceptional circumstances that have prevented you from submitting by the original submission deadline. You can only self-certify three assessments per academic year. If you have used all your self- certification opportunities, or requested mitigation after the deadline, you will need to provide evidence of your exceptional circumstances for your request to be granted.
The Student Union Advice Service can provide support and guide you through the extension and mitigation process; you can access further information by visiting the UWLSU webpage.
There may be times when you experience circumstances outside of your control and talking to your Module Leader/Tutor and seeking help from other support services in the university will keep you on track with your studies. You can access support and guidance and confidential help at our Support for current students page and by vising the Student Hub. It is equally important to consider your safety and the safety of others around you, especially how to stay safe online and ensure your communications are secure and appropriate. You should also familiarise yourself with the University Safeguarding Policy, process, and procedure.
You can get support with your academic writing and study skills through 1 – 2- 1 appointments and workshops with the Study Support Team.
The Peer Mentoring Service gives you the opportunity to develop your skills and enhance your confidence; whether you would like to receive the support of a Peer Mentor or volunteer to be a Peer Mentor you can get involved!
Order Custom Answers for MS70121E Competitive Strategy & Innovation Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentMany University of West London students are struggling with their MS70121E Competitive Strategy & Innovation assignment. If you need expert guidance, our Business Management Assignment Help service is here for you. We offer top-quality Assignment Samples that make complex topics simple and clear. Our team provides 100% original, plagiarism-free, and easy-to-understand content. Choose the Best Assignment Help to improve your grades and confidence. Learn smartly with expert support you can rely on.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content