MGTM15 HRM in an International and Digital Context First sit Assessment Brief PG

Request Plagiarism Free Answer Published: 30 Jan, 2026

Category	Assignment	Subject	Management
University	___	Module Title	MGTM15 HRM in an International and Digital Context

Assessment Type	First sit

MGTM15 Assessment Brief – Postgraduate

Instructions on Assessment:

With reference to appropriate models, theories, frameworks, and academic literature, you are required to create a digital academic poster that responds the following:

Choose a MNC and one of its subsidiary countries to illustrate the challenges an ‘expatriate’ manager will face in the chosen host country in comparison to the parent country, for example corruption, risk factors etc and you are to provide appropriate recommendations to overcome these challenges. The academic poster will illustrate knowledge and application of appropriate models, frameworks, and theory but also be esthetically pleasing with the use of colour, imagery and imagination to represent the chosen country. The poster must include text citation and a reference list. Additionally, the poster will be accompanied with a critical reflection (1000 words) to state why you chose the particular MNC and the associated challenges, justification with be required. Both sections will test all learning outcomes.

The size of the digital academic poster is A1 (594mm x 841mm) and the word count is 800- 1200 words (+/- 10%) and it is weighed at 100% of the overall mark. The poster can be created in power point (one slide), but both the poster and critical reflection are to be merged as a PDF and submitted in this format.

This is an individual assessment and does not require a presentation.

Word limits for assignments

Please note, in text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and direct secondary quotations [e.g. “dib- dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p.123)] are INCLUDED in the word count.
Summarising and compressing the information in your assignment into the word limit is one of the skills that students are expected to acquire and demonstrate as part of the assignment process.

Submission of Assessment:

All assignments must be submitted via the Turnitin Dropbox on the hand-in date notified at the beginning of this brief. It is advisable to retain a copy of your assignment for you own records. Your mark and feedback will be made available to you electronically once the internal moderation process has taken place, you should note that at this stage marks are still subject to external examiner and academic board approval.

Referencing your work:

In this institution the Harvard method of referencing is used.

The Harvard method of referring to publications and of arranging references uses the author's name and the date of the publication. References are listed at the end of the text in alphabetical order by author's name. The general format of a journal reference is shown below:

Smith, J. (1999) How to succeed! Journal of Entrepreneurs , 1(2), p. 34-56
Author’s name and initials are listed first, followed by year of publication in brackets. Then there is the title of article and the journal where article appears, which is underlined or in italics. Finally, state the volume and issue Number (in brackets) along with the pages where article can be located.

A short guide to Harvard referencing will also be available on the Sunspace site under the module assessment navigation button.

Buy Custom Answer Of MGTM15 HRM in an International and Digital Context Assessment

Get A Free Quote

Academic Integrity and Misconduct:

Your attention is drawn to the University’s stated position on plagiarism. THE WORK OF OTHERS, WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE ASSIGNMENT MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO ITS
SOURCE (a full bibliography and/or a list of references must be submitted as prescribed in the assessment brief).

Please note that this is intended to be an individual piece of work. Action will be taken where a student is suspected of having cheated or engaged in any dishonest practice. Students are referred to the University regulations on plagiarism and other forms of academic irregularity. Students must not copy or collude with one another or present any information that they themselves have not generated.

Assessment		Categories
	Grade	Relevance	Knowledge	Analysis	Argument and Structure	Critical Evaluation	Presentation	Reference to Literature
Pass	86 –100%	The work examined is exemplary and provides clear evidence of a complete grasp of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also unequivocal evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work will be exemplary in all the categories cited above. It will demonstrate a particularly compelling evaluation, originality, and elegance of argument, interpretation, or discourse.
	76-85%	The work examined is excellent and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also excellent evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that level are fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work will beexcellent in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly compelling evaluation and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse and some evidence of originality.
	70 –75%	The work examined is of a high standard and there is evidence of comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is clearly articulated evidence demonstrating that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that level are satisfied At this level it is expected that the standard of the work will be high in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly compelling evaluation and elegance of argument,interpretation, or discourse.
	60 –69%	Directly relevant to the requirements of the assessment	A substantial knowledge of relevant material, showing a clear grasp of themes,questions, and issues therein	Comprehensive analysis - clear and orderly presentation	Well supported, focussed argument which is clear and logically structured.	Contains distinctive or independent thinking; and begins to formulate an independent positionin relation to theory and/or practice.	Well written, with standard spelling and grammar, in a readable style with acceptable format	Critical appraisal of up-to- date and/or appropriate literature. Recognition of different perspectives.Very good use of a widerange of sophisticated source material.
	50 –59%	Some attempt to address the requirements of the assessment: may drift away from this in less focused passages	Adequate knowledge of a fair range of relevant material, with intermittent evidence of anappreciation of its significance	Significant analytical treatment which has a clear purpose	Generally coherent and logically structured, using an appropriate mode of argument and/or theoretical mode(s)	May contain some distinctive or independent thinking; may begin to formulate an independent positionin relation to theory and/or practice.	Competently written, with only minor lapses from standard grammar, with acceptable format	Uses a good variety of literature which includes recent texts and/or appropriate literature, including a substantive amount beyond librarytexts. Competent use of source material.
	40 –49%	Some correlation with the requirements of the assessment but there are instances of irrelevance	Basic understanding of the subject but addressing a limited range of material	Some analytical treatment, but may be prone to description, or to narrative, which lacks clearanalytical purpose	Some attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency, with issues at stake stated only vaguely, or theoreticalmode(s) couched in simplistic terms	Sound work which expresses a coherent position only in broad terms and in uncritical conformity to one or more standard views of the topic	A simple basic style but with significant deficiencies in expression or format that may pose obstacles for the reader	Evidence of use of appropriate literature which goes beyond that referred to by the tutor. Frequently only uses a single source to support a point.
Fail	35 –39%	Relevance to the requirements of the assessment may be very intermittent, and may be reduced to its vaguest and least challengingterms	A limited understanding of a narrow range of material	Largely descriptive or narrative, with little evidence of analysis	A basic argument is evident, but mainly supported by assertion and there may be a lack of clarity and coherence	Some evidence of a view starting to be formed but mainly derivative.	Numerous deficiencies in expression and presentation; the writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using a simplistic orrepetitious style	Barely adequate use of literature. Over reliance onmaterial provided by the tutor.
Fail	35 –39%	The evidence provided shows that the majority of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied – for compensation consideration.

Order Custom Samples for MGTM15 HRM in an International and Digital Context Assessment

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Request Answer of this Assignment

Share this with your Friends

Facebook

Instagram

Struggling with your MGTM15 HRM in an International and Digital Context assessment? Get expert guidance from our HRM Assignment Help service to make your studies easier and improve your grades. Our team of skilled writers delivers 100% human-written, unique, and easy-to-understand assignments. We also provide a free list of assignment samples to help you learn effective writing styles and enhance your work. Choose online assignment help UK today and achieve academic success with reliable support!