| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Regent College London | Module Title | MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making |
| Assessment Type | Oral Assessment |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Presentation |
| MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making | |
| Assessment Number |
1 |
| Assessment Type (and weighting) | Oral Assessment (30% of final mark) |
| Assessment Name | Presentation (20 Minutes) |
| Assessment Submission Date | Week 9 - Assignment 1 - Oral Assessment – w/c 27th Oct 2025 (upload deadline – 31st Oct 2025) |
Assume you are the finance manager in an organisation, and you have been directed by the finance director to make a presentation to a group of potential investors looking to invest in your organisation.
You are required to prepare a financial analysis using an appropriate performance matrix and present your findings about the financial performance of the company on efÏciency, liquidity, and profitability. You are required to use the information provided in the company’s annual accounts, including Market ratios to measure the market performance of the shares anddividend payments, etc, of the organisation, evaluating it for the benefit of the potential investors, who will be invited to attend a short presentation provided by you. You have also been asked to critically assess the relevance of annual reports to stakeholders and any otheradditional internal management information that may help in financial analyses when speaking to potential investors.
You should select a company from the FTSE100 London stock market (Public Limited Company –PLC). You will need to obtain a copy of their most recent annual report/accounts, alongside any other internal management information that will help you analyse the company’s financial performance.
You must let your tutor know your chosen organisation. Using MS PowerPoint or any other similar tool, prepare a presentation based on the financial information in the annual report and internal management data. The presentation is to be made to an invited group of potential investors. The presentation will be for 20 minutes and will be followed by questions from the examiners.
You can consider the following in your structure:
Implementation of relevant ratio analysis – calculation or extraction from annual report financial statements.
Market ratios - Measuring the market performance of the company – calculating and interpreting share price, EPS, PE/ratio & dividends payout, or cover.
Relevance of annual reports in general to stakeholders.
Any additional internal management information relevant to potential investors.
You may wish to consider any two of the following as additional internal managementinformation.
Specific Assessment Criteria/Marking Scheme:
Background and structure of the company – 20%
Financial analysis of the company - 50%
Research & Presentation-15%
Q&A (from both student and examiner) – 15%
Important and helpful information
Please refer to the Module Guide for information regarding indicative reading, guidelines for the preparation and submission of assignments, and the assessment criteria.
Do You Need MBA7060 Assignment of This Question
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentSubmission
Electronic copies of assignments should be submitted via “Turn-it-in” NO LATER THAN THE DEADLINE.
Please ensure you follow the instructions provided by your module tutor and in the assessment brief. Submission of assessments must be done by the submission date. Assignments not available at this time will be considered late unless an extension has been previously agreed.
Students who fail to submit assessments by the specified date (without an extension being granted or without accepted Mitigating Circumstances) will be subject to the following penalties:
|
|
|
% | Relevance | Knowledge | Argument/Analysis | Structure | Presentation | Written English | Research/Referencing |
| DISTINCTION | Exceptional Quality | 85-100% |
Almost all parts of the report are directly relevant to the title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief are expertly addressed in an exemplary manner.
|
Exemplary knowledge of concepts, theory, and practice is clearly demonstrated in all areas. The interpretation of appropriate concepts and theoretical models with insight is visible. There is exemplary display creativity in conceptual original thinking. |
The work produced is exceptional in analyzing essential research materials. An exemplary level of evaluation is made based on an excellent theoretical understanding of the work discussed, and clear evidence of independent, informed judgment is made. |
An exemplary level of coherence and structure framed the analysis. Work is articulated and logically structured and has shown complete compliance with the recommended format.
|
Exemplary presentational style and format commensurate with the nature of the work. Excellent use of figures, tables, and plates (where required). | An exceptional level of language is used with no grammatical errors, excellent punctuation, and usage of appropriate formal academic and industry language and terminology. |
Harvard referencing has been applied correctly with no errors throughout the work for in-text and end-of-text referencing. A large variety of current, varied, and suitable sources have been used. Recognition of different perspectives is acknowledged and applied.
|
| Excellent Quality | 70-84% |
Most parts of the report are directly relevant to the title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief are excellently addressed |
Excellent knowledge of concepts, theory, and practice is clearly demonstrated in all areas. The interpretation of appropriate concepts and theoretical models with insight is visible. There is an excellent display of creativity in conceptual original thinking. |
The work produced is excellent in analyzing essential research materials. An excellent level of evaluation is made based on an excellent theoretical understanding of the work discussed and clear evidence of independent, informed judgment being given. | An excellent level of coherence and structure in framing the analysis. Work is articulated and logically structured, and has shown an excellent level of compliance with the recommended format. | Excellent presentational style and format, commensurate with the nature of the work. Excellent use of figures, tables, and plates (where required). | An excellent level of English language is used with no grammatical errors. Excellent punctuation, usage of appropriate formal academic and industry language and terminology. | Harvard referencing has been applied correctly with no errors throughout the essay for in-text and end-of-text referencing. A large variety of current, varied, and suitable sources have been used. Recognition of different perspectives is acknowledged and applied. | |
| MERIT | Good Quality | 60-69% |
Major parts of the work produced are directly relevant to the title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief are addressed very well. |
There is a very good understanding of theory and practice at this level. Explanation of relevant conceptual material shows a very good grasp of the themes, questions, and issues therein. |
Presents a coherent analysis of significant research materials that leads to distinct and original conclusions. Work produced is very good and able to contribute to the expansion of subject-area knowledge and understanding. |
Major parts of the work are coherently articulated and logically constructed. A very good level of compliance with the suggested format can be seen. |
Very good presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment. Very good use of figures, tables, and plates with good levels of explanation |
Well written, with standard spelling and grammar, in a readable style and acceptable format | Good level of appraisal of up-to-date and/or appropriate literature. Recognition of different perspectives. Knowledgeable use of source material. Uses a range of sources. Harvard referenced with minor mistakes. |
| PASS | Satisfactory Quality | 50-59% | A substantial amount of work produced generally addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief. Work may contain some minor irrelevancies in places. |
Demonstrates a good and adequate knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Good attempt at interpreting some appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Shows a good level of originality in explaining concepts |
Some analytical treatment, but may be prone to description, or to narrative, which lacks a clear analytical purpose. Some attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency, with issues at stake stated only vaguely, or theoretical modes (s) couched in simplistic terms. |
Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure.
A good level of compliance with the acceptable format is present. |
The presentational style & layout are largely correct for the type of assignment.
Substantial use of tables, figures, and plates, but may lack the required explanation |
Written, with only minor lapses from standard grammar, and with an acceptable format | Uses a variety of literature, which includes some recent texts and/or appropriate literature, though not necessarily including a substantive amount beyond library texts. Competent use of source material. Used Harvard referencing in most places, with the majority cited correctly |
| FAIL | Borderline Fail | 45-49% |
Basic understanding of the subject and addressing a limited range of materials. Contains a lot of irrelevant material.
|
There are certain gaps in the knowledge of theory and practice at this level. Inadequate knowledge of relevant concepts and theoretical models. In areas, demonstrates only some conceptual grasp. |
Largely descriptive or narrative, with little evidence of analysis and evaluation. A basic argument is evident, but mainly supported by assertion.
|
There may be a lack of clarity and coherence, a limited attempt at articulation, and problems with structure. Some formatting errors are also visible. |
Some weaknesses in the presentational style & layout. Only limited sections are presented logically. Some inappropriate use of figures, tables, and plates, and most are largely irrelevant. |
A simple, basic style, but with significant deficiencies in expression or format that may pose obstacles for the reader | Limited number of contemporary and relevant sources cited. Work is dominated by material supplied by the tutor. Attempted to use Harvard referencing, but the majority are wrongly cited. |
| Fail |
30-44%
|
Materials have little or no relevance to the title and/or brief. Issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms. |
Heavy dependence on description, and/or on paraphrase, is common. Lacks development and may be repetitive or thin. Limited understanding and application of concepts. |
Little evidence of coherent argument. Almost wholly derivative: the writer’s contribution rarely goes beyond simplifying paraphrase. Mostly devoid of originality and creativity. Clear conclusions are not stated. |
Very poorly structured work. Lack of articulation and coherence in concepts and context. Format deficiency is clear |
Work is wholly lacking the presentational style &/or layout required. Figures, tables, and plates are ignored in the text or not used where clearly needed. |
Numerous deficiencies in expression, the writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using a simplistic or repetitious style | Barely adequate use of literature. Over-reliance on basic material provided by the tutor. Little or no attempt at Harvard referencing. | |
|
<30%
|
Relevance to the title and/or brief is intermittent or completely missing. The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms. |
Clearly shows a lack of basic knowledge of either theory or practice for this level. There is very little or no evidence of conceptual understanding. |
Severely limited arguments. Descriptive or narrative in style, with no evidence of critique and originality, or creativity. Conclusions are sparse or not in line with the context. |
Wholly lacking structure. No visible attempt to articulate or coherently provide concepts and context. Format deficiency is clear. |
Work is completely devoid of the presentational style &/or layout. Figures, tables, and plates are ignored in the text or not used where clearly needed. |
Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in grammar, spelling, expression, and style. | Very limited evidence of required reading and no attempt at Harvard referencing. Clear absence of academic sources. |
Do You Need MBA7060 Assignment for This Question
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentDo you need help with an assignment for MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making? Look no further! We are here for management assignment help. We also provide free assignment solutions written by PhD expert writers—100% original content, no plagiarism! Plus, we also provide assignment help, that too by complete before the deadline. Quality and accuracy are taken care of completely. So contact us today and be stress-free!
If you want to see the related solution of this brief, then click here:-MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
