| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Bolton | Module Title | MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making |
| Word Count | 3000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Assignment 2: Individual written report (70% of final mark) |
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |
|
MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making |
|
|
Assessment Number |
AS2 |
|
Assessment Type (and weighting) |
Individual written report (70% of final mark) |
|
Assessment Name |
Written report - Coursework (3000 words) |
|
Assessment Submission Date |
Week 14 - Assignment 2 (70%)- Report Submission – 1st Dec 2025 |
LO1: Demonstrate a broad knowledge of accounting principles and their use in decision-making and control, including awareness of external regulatory, legal, ethical frameworks, and financial reporting requirements
LO3: Critically evaluate, select and use financial software applications, including spreadsheets, etc., to support problem solving in key business areas.
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Applications in this Assessment
|
AI Status |
Application |
Notes |
|
Category A |
No GAI tool is permitted. |
While grammar and/or spell checkers may be used to correct individual words and sentences, the use of GAI is not allowed. This is because the learning outcomes require you to produce original assessment work without any GAI assistance Any GAI generated content which is presented as your own original work and is not acknowledged will be assessed for academic misconduct. |
International financial accounting regulation, budgeting and Investment appraisal
Global economic volatility has continued to cause widespread uncertainties in many countries and in businesses across the world. Inflation, though, has stabilised in some countries; it is still on the rise in so many others especially the developing climes. This has forced the monetary policy makers in these countries to continue to raise interest rates with the view that this will reduce inflation.
On the other hand, the continuous increase in demand for some goods and services all over the world has created opportunities for many businesses, who have or are seeking new areas of expansion. There appears to be a healthy global outlook for businesses as competition increases. Businesses that have not put their house in order to exploit these opportunities are now seeking to have more understanding of the regulatory and legal framework in finance, improve or maintain an appropriate budgeting system to be able to maintain a healthy cash-flow and participate in this promising global business outlook.
Miltons is a UK-based software manufacturing company. The directors believe that there is potential for growth in their product globally. To exploit this opportunity, they are seeking to have more understanding of the regulatory and legal framework in finance as well as finding better ways to improve their capital investment and budgeting processes. They are also considering opening a new office in continental Europe or install a new payment software system at the head office in Milton Keynes to help it do business better.
They have approached you as management consultant to help advise and determine which option is the best for them.
Your job is to write a report to advise Miltons on their obligations on the international regulatory and legal standards in accounting, suggest ways of oving budgeting and evaluate the investment options and recommend which is the best for them.
Using data provided by the organisation, you are to complete a cash budget, and NPV investment appraisal technique in Microsoft Excel and use the results to advise and suggest improvements for Miltons.
In your report, you are required to, among other things, cover the following:
1.Introduction: What the report is about and parameters to be covered in the report including the meaning and essence of regulatory and legal obligations, budgeting, and project appraisal (10 marks)
2.Analyse the international financial accounting regulatory bodies and their responsibilities. Critically evaluate the legal obligations and financial accounting standards and accounting principles Milton must follow. Critically examine some of the elements Miltons should consider when carrying out project appraisals using NPV technique (20 marks)
3.Prepare a cash budget and Project Appraisals using Net Present Value (NPV) only – using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, from a set of data provided. (An additional excel case study information is provided for this) (15 marks)
4.Using the result of the NPV techniques, and using NPV theories and practice, which investment option would you recommend? Provide the reasons for this decision. (10% of total mark)
5.Respectively, critically evaluate the merits and limitations of:
6.In the light of the cash budget produced, recommend to Miltons some strategies to improve cash flow in its budgeting. (10 mark)
7.Reflecting on your report, evaluate how your understanding of international regulatory and legal framework in accounting, budgeting, as well as net present value capital investment appraisal technique has helped your professional development? (10 marks)
8.References (in-text and bibliography) and Presentation (10 mark)
9.Appendix
Important and helpful information
|
File type |
Word processed/PDF |
|
Font |
12 pitch font – Arial or Times New Roman |
|
Format |
1.5 line-spaced and justified |
|
Referencing |
Harvard style |
Hire Experts to solve MBA7060 Assignment 2 before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentPlease refer to the Module Guide for information regarding indicative reading, guidelines for the preparation and submission of assignments, and the assessment criteria.
Electronic copies of assignments should be submitted via “Turn-it-in
Submission of assessments may be done on or before the published submission date. Assignments not available at this time will be considered late unless an extension has been previously agreed.
Students who fail to submit assessments by the specified date (without an extension being granted or without accepted Mitigating Circumstances) will be subject to the following penalties:
Please note that it is your responsibility to ensure that the assignment is submitted in the format/s specified in the Module Guide or on the Assessment Brief.
YOU SHOULD ALWAYS ENSURE YOU KEEP A COPY OF ANY ASSIGNMENT SUBMITTED.
In the case of exceptional and unforeseen circumstances, an extension of up to 14 days after the assessment deadline may be granted. This must be agreed by your Programme Leader, following a discussion the Module Tutor. You should complete an Extension Request Form available from Student Services and attach documentary evidence of your circumstances, prior to the published submission deadline.
Extensions over 14 calendar days should be requested using the Mitigating Circumstances procedure.
Some students with registered disabilities will be eligible for revised submission deadlines. Revised submission deadlines do not require the completion extension request paperwork.
Please see the Programme Handbook for further details.
Level HE7 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include four refereed academic journals and five academic books.
|
|
|
% |
Relevance |
Knowledge |
Argument/Analysis |
Structure |
Presentation |
Written English |
Research/Referencing |
|
DISTINCTION |
|
85-100% |
Almost all parts of the report are directly relevant to title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirement of the brief is expertly addressed in an exemplary manner.
|
Exemplary knowledge of concepts, theory and practice is clearly demonstrated is all areas. The interpretation of appropriate concepts and theoretical models with insight is visible. There is exemplary display creativity in conceptual original thinking. |
Work produced is exceptional in analysing essential research materials. An exemplary level of evaluation is made based on an excellent theoretical understanding of work discussed and clear evidence of independent, informed judgement is made. |
An exemplary level of coherence and structure in framed the analysis. Work is articulated and logically structured and has shown complete compliant with recommended format.
|
Exemplary presentational style and format commensurate with the nature of work. Excellent use of figures, tables, and plates (where required). |
Exceptional level of language is used with no grammatical errors, excellent punctuation and usage of appropriate formal academic and industry language and terminology. |
Harvard referencing has been applied correctly with no errors throughout the work for in text and end of text referencing. A large variety of current, varied, and suitable sources have been used. Recognition of different perspectives is acknowledged and applied.
|
|
|
Excellent Quality |
70-84% |
Most parts of the report are directly relevant to title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirement of the brief is excellently addressed |
Excellent knowledge of concepts, theory and practice is clearly demonstrated is all areas. The interpretation of appropriate concepts and theoretical models with insight is visible. There is excellent display of creativity in conceptual original thinking. |
Work produced is excellent in analysing essential research materials. An excellent level of evaluation is made based on an excellent theoretical understanding of work discussed and clear evidence of independent, informed judgement being given. |
An excellent level of coherence and structure in framing the analysis. Work is articulated and logically structured and has shown excellent level of compliant with recommended format. |
Excellent presentational style and format, commensurate with the nature of work. Excellent use of figures, tables, and plates (where required). |
Excellent level of English language is used with no grammatical errors. Excellent punctuation, usage of appropriate formal academic and industry language and terminology. |
Harvard referencing has been applied correctly with no errors throughout the essay for in text and end of text referencing. A large variety of current, varied, and suitable sources have been used. Recognition of different perspectives is acknowledged and applied. |
|
MERIT |
Good Quality |
60-69% |
Major parts of the work produced is directly relevant to title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirement of the brief is addressed very well. |
There is very good understanding of theory and practice at this level. Explanation of relevant conceptual material shows very good grasp of the themes, questions, and issues therein. |
Presents a coherent analysis of significant research materials that leads to distinct and original conclusions. Work produced is very good and able to contributes to the expansion of subject-area knowledge and understanding. |
Major parts of the work is coherently articulated and logically constructed. A very good level of compliant with suggested format can be seen. |
Very good presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment. Very good use of figures, tables, and plates with good levels of explanations |
Well written, with standard spelling and grammar, in a readable style and acceptable format |
Good level of appraisal of up-to-date and/or appropriate literature. Recognition of different perspectives. Knowledgeable use of source material. Uses a range of sources. Harvard referenced with minor mistakes. |
|
PASS |
Satisfactory Quality |
50-59% |
Substantial amount of work produced generally addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief. Work may contain some minor irrelevances in places. |
Demonstrates a good and adequate knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Good attempt in interpreting some appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Shows good level of originality in explaining concepts |
Some analytical treatment, but may be prone to description, or to narrative, which lacks clear analytical purpose. Some attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency, with issues at stake stated only vaguely, or theoretical mode(s) couched in simplistic terms. |
Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure.
A good level of compliant with acceptable format is present. |
The presentational style & layout is largely correct for the type of assignment.
Substantial use tables, figures and plates but may lack required explanation |
Written, with only minor lapses from standard grammar, with acceptable format |
Uses a variety of literature which includes some recent texts and/or appropriate literature, though not necessarily including a substantive amount beyond library texts. Competent use of source material. Used Harvard referencing in most places with majority cited correctly |
|
FAIL |
Borderline Fail |
45-49% |
Basic understanding of the subject and addressing a limited range of materials. Contains a lot of irrelevant materials.
|
There are certain gaps in knowledge of theory and practice at this level. Inadequate knowledge of relevant concepts and theoretical models. In areas, demonstrates only some conceptual grasp. |
Largely descriptive or narrative, with little evidence of analysis and evaluation. A basic argument is evident, but mainly supported by assertion.
|
There may be a lack of clarity and coherence and limited attempt at articulation and problems with structure. Some formatting errors are also visible. |
Some weaknesses in the presentational style & layout. Only limited sections are presented logically. Some inappropriate use of figures, tables and plates, and most are largely irrelevant. |
A simple basic style but with significant deficiencies in expression or format that may pose obstacles for the reader |
Limited number of contemporary and relevant sources cited. Work is dominated by material supplied by tutor. Attempted to use Harvard referencing but majority are wrongly cited. |
|
|
Fail |
30-44%
|
Materials have little or no relevance to the title and/or brief. Issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms. |
Heavy dependence on description, and/or on paraphrase, is common. Lacks development and may be repetitive or thin Limited understanding and application of concepts. |
Little evidence of coherent argument. Almost wholly derivative: the writer’s contribution rarely goes beyond simplifying paraphrase. Mostly devoid of originality and creativity. Clear conclusions are not stated. |
Very poorly structured work. Lack of articulation and coherence in concepts and context. Format deficiency is clear |
Work is wholly lacking the presentational style &/or layout required. Figures, tables, and plates are ignored in text or not used where clearly needed. |
Numerous deficiencies in expression the writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using a simplistic or repetitious style |
Barely adequate use of literature. Over reliance on basic material provided by the tutor. Little or no attempt to Harvard reference. |
|
|
|
<30%
|
Relevance to the title and/or brief is intermittent or completely missing. The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms. |
Clearly shows a lack of basic knowledge of either theory or practice for this level. There is very little or no evidence of conceptual understanding. |
Severely limited arguments. Descriptive or narrative in style with no evidence of critique and originality or creativity. Conclusions are sparse or not in line with context. |
Wholly lacking structure. No visible attempt to articulate or coherently provide concepts and context. Format deficiency is clear. |
Work is completely devoid of the presentational style &/or layout. Figures, tables, and plates are ignored in text or not used where clearly needed. |
Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in grammar, spelling, expression, and style. |
Very limited evidence of required reading and no attempt at Harvard referencing. Clear absence of academic sources. |
Order Custom Answers for MBA7060 Assignment 2
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentStruggling with your MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making Assignment? Let us help! We offer professional, affordable assignment writing services that are AI-free, plagiarism-free, and delivered on time. Our team of PhD experts understands what universities expect and creates high-quality content tailored to your needs. We also offer free assignment samples so you can check our quality before booking. Our expert team provides Management Assignment Help that has been designed for the students. We’re available 24/7 to support you. Don’t wait until the last minute—contact us now and make your academic life easier with trusted expert assignment help!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
