Category | Assignment | Subject | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|
University | Oxford Brookes University | Module Title | MARK7045 Introduction to the Principles of Responsible Marketing |
Type of assessment: |
Written Assignment |
Individual or group: |
Individual |
Component weighting: |
Contributes 100% of the total module grade |
Learning outcomes assessed |
L/O 1-5 |
The resit assignment MUST be a different combination of existing brand+new sector. It cannot just be a reworked version of your previous assignment submission.
HINT: In the past, some students have chosen to keep their data on the new sector and just change the brand, for example.
This module is assessed through one individual assignment which involves applying key marketing principles in the development of an outline marketing plan for extending an existing brand into a new product or service category. The choice of existing brand and new category are up to you but in your assignment, you need to be able to demonstrate:
1)Why the move into that sector makes sense for that brand
2)Why it is a new sector for that brand.
HINT #1: Help yourself by closely checking the marking criteria (shown at the end of this document) and to use the ‘Ask Junior’ Help Forum on your Moodle site to ask for clarification if there is anything you do not fully understand. The topic MUST be an existing brand into a new product or service category (not just a new country).
HINT #2: It is important to note that we will NOT be assessing based upon the novelty or creativeness of your idea but upon the extent to which your outline plan is supported by good quality research and analysis demonstrating a thorough understanding of the principles covered on the syllabus of the IPROM course.
HINT #3: Make sure the analysis is your own. Do not use templates such as SWOT or PESTLE on your brand that you have found on-line. This is plagiarism even if you reference them correctly. Use the extensive resources on Moodle to ensure you are not referred for cheating.
HINT #4: Note the assessment criteria has been updated for this term so do not rely on previous versions or the experiences of previous students.
HINT #5: Students who have failed this course in the past almost inevitably are the ones who also did not attend the lectures and seminars. Attendance is taken each week. We have found a direct correlation between attendance and marks achieved so I strongly recommend you engage with the lectures, films and forums as well as the face to face seminars if you want to do well on the module.
HINT #6: Remember the exemplars on Moodle do not feature the new requirement for ‘Responsible marketing’ and ethics/sustainability – but your assignment needs to, as described in the original assignment brief and in the marketing grid.
Do You Need MARK7045 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentYour assignment when submitted should not include your name – we use a system of anonymous marking to reduce the risk of any unconscious bias.
The authentic and essential requirements for this piece of assessed work are;
HINT: Word count suggestions are to help you match your content to the weight of the marks but are for guidance only ... it is the overall total that matters.
1)Cover page (not included in word count). This needs to include title, student number and assignment word count - NOT your name as it is marked anonymously.
2)Table of Contents (not included in word count)
3)Executive summary (not included in word count) 1-2 paragraphs maximum, no references.
4)Introduction (state the aim of the assignment and its structure, provide an overview of the chosen organisation/product) (approx. 200 words). This needs to include why the brand stretch into the new category makes sense for that brand and identify any ethical/responsible marketing issues.
5)Environmental analysis supporting the opportunity for the product development (external + internal using suitable models) + infographic (+ approx. 500 words)
6)Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning Strategy (approx. 350 words)
7)Marketing Plan (product, price, place, promotion) using the models from the course (approx. 700 words). 7Ps if doing a service.
8)Conclusion: Implications for responsible marketing (approx. 200 words)
9)References (not included in word count)
10)Appendix (not included in word count)
Sources to be used throughout the assignment can include:
Academic journal articles, secondary market research such as Mintel or Euromonitor, government statistics, marketing textbooks, company websites, credible news articles, industry trade press, marketing case studies.
The length of the assignment is limited by a set number of 2,000 words to contribute towards the development of writing skills and to ensure all work is assessed equitably. We therefore require you to complete your assignments within this word limit. Work in excess of this word limit will not be marked (note: there is NO +/-10% word count for this assignment). Also, if you have written less than 1,800 words, it is unlikely you have met the brief. If in doubt, you should discuss this with the Module Leader or Seminar tutor before submission.
You will need to think carefully about how best to explain your case within the permitted number of words, using, for example, an appropriate mix of text, drawings, diagrams, and tables, supplemented by information contained in appendices. Inappropriate use of appendices will be taken into consideration when awarding the final mark. Therefore, appendices are limited to 5 pages maximum.
Please also remember that a report can be enhanced or damaged through layout, for example, placing all tables and drawings in appendices can hamper the flow of discussion. Decisions therefore need to be made about the most appropriate place to use tables etc, to support your case.
For clarity, the specified word count refers to the main body of the report. The word count does include headings and in-text citations, but does not include equations, tables, or diagrams, executive summary, contents page, reference list, appendix or the title page.
The new Turnitin policy effective from September 2022 can be found via this link. You are expected to be familiar with it. It is important to know that the reference list and quotations are included in the overall similarity report, and that these matches are expected and not problematic.
Assessment Criteria |
Outstanding
85-100% |
Excellent
70-84% |
Very Good
60-69% |
Threshold Pass 50-59% |
Marginal Refer 40-49% |
Refer
0-39% |
Applies and justifies appropriate theoretical models and concepts in the situation analysis supporting the opportunity for the product (20%). |
Outstanding assignment that fully meets the marking criteria, shows clear understanding and application of theory from the IPORM course and exhibits a superior level of analysis given the constraints of the word count. |
Analysis presents a clear rational for the brand moving into the new sector.
Analysis shows evidence of excellent and extensive overall understanding of the external environment / competitive context of the new sector as well as the strengths/ weaknesses of the current brand and any ethical/responsible marketing issues or opportunities. |
Analysis presents a clear rational for the brand moving into the new sector.
Analysis shows evidence of very good and extensive overall understanding of the external environment / competitive context of the new sector as well as the strengths/ weaknesses of the current brand and any ethical/responsible marketing issues or opportunities. |
Analysis presents some rational for the brand moving into the new sector.
Analysis shows evidence of competent understanding of the external environment / competitive context of the new sector as well as the strengths/ weaknesses of the current brand and any ethical/responsible marketing issues or opportunities. |
Analysis does not present an adequate rational for the brand moving into the new sector.
Analysis shows evidence of limited or no understanding of the external environment / competitive context of the new sector as well as the strengths/ weaknesses of the current brand and any ethical/responsible marketing issues or opportunities. |
Rationale for moving the brand into the new sector missing.
Analysis of external environment imported from another source or not supported by evidence.
No relevant ethical/responsible marketing issue or opportunities identified. |
Applies and justifies appropriate theoretical models and concepts in the critical evaluation of consumer/ customer segmentation, targeting and positioning strategy (20%). |
Outstanding assignment that fully meets the marking criteria, shows clear understanding and application of theory from the IPORM course and exhibits a superior level of analysis given the constraints of the word count. |
Excellent description of 2-4 customer segment profiles for potential customer targets for the brand stretch.
Well explained rationale for choice of one of these segments for targeting.
Insightful description of positioning of brand stretch towards that one target customer group compared to the competition. |
Clear description of 2-4 customer segment profiles for potential customer targets for the brand stretch.
Clear rationale for choice of one of these segments for targeting.
Clear description of positioning of brand stretch towards that one target customer group compared to the competition. |
Some description of 2-4 customer segment profiles for potential customer targets for the brand stretch.
Some rationale for choice of one of these segments for targeting.
Limited description of positioning of brand stretch towards that one target customer group compared to the competition. |
Inadequate description of potential customer segments.
Limited or no rational for targeting one of these segments.
Limited or no description of positioning for the new brand stretch opportunity.
|
No customer segments/profiles described
Incorrect or no brand positioning described or positioning imported from another source. |
Applies and justifies appropriate theoretical models and concepts in the discussion and evaluation of issues affecting the marketing mix (25%). |
Outstanding assignment that fully meets the marking criteria, shows clear understanding and application of theory from the IPORM course and exhibits a superior level of analysis given the constraints of the word count. |
Insightful plan presented for new brand to reach the target audience with all relevant sections of the marketing mix including clear use of theory and models from the course and substantiation of points made. |
Clear plan presented for new brand to reach the target audience with all relevant sections of the marketing mix including use of theory and models from the course and substantiation of some of the points made |
Adequate plan presented for new brand to reach the target audience with all relevant sections of the marketing mix including clear use of theory and models from the course, limited or no substantiation of points made. |
Limited or no plan presented to reach target audience, limited or no use of theory and frameworks from the course, limited or no substantiation of points made. |
Theory and models from the IPORM course not used or not used correctly. |
The extent to which the report makes use of a balanced range of sources, professional, trade, academic and news media, in order to provide a sound basis for analysis and recommendations (15%). |
Outstanding assignment that fully meets the marking criteria, shows clear understanding and application of theory from the IPORM course and exhibits a superior level of analysis given the constraints of the word count. |
Excellent and critical use of extensive and relevant up-to- date sources to substantiate points made. Sources to all be credible and include academic journal articles. |
Good use of extensive and relevant up-to- date sources to substantiate points made. Sources to all be credible and include academic journal articles. |
Competent use of extensive and relevant up-to- date sources to substantiate points made. Limited use of non-credible sources, limited use of academic journal articles. |
Limited use of extensive and relevant up-to- date sources to substantiate points made. Use of non-credible sources, limited or no academic journal articles |
Lack of substantiation and evidence – and /or use of non-credible sources, limited or no academic journal articles |
The report is referenced using the Harvard style of referencing and includes a full reference list. Referencing is accurate, systematic, and comprehensive. A properly formatted reference list is mandatory. PLUS: The report is presented clearly and coherently and is written in a good standard of English (10%). |
Outstanding assignment that fully meets the marking criteria, shows clear understanding and application of theory from the IPORM course and exhibits a superior level of analysis given the constraints of the word count. |
Professionally presented analysis which communicates clearly and concisely with few/no spelling/ grammatical errors; list of sources is accurate and complete using Harvard style. Excellent standard of English and coherent writing style. |
Very well-presented analysis which communicates clearly and concisely with few/some spelling/ grammatical errors; list of sources is accurate and complete. Good standard of English and coherent writing style. |
Well-presented analysis which generally communicates clearly, some spelling/ grammatical errors; list of sources is mainly accurate and complete. Clear use of English and coherent writing style. |
Assignment not professionally presented. List of sources incomplete or inaccurate. Writing style difficult to understand. |
Assignment not presented to postgraduate level. List of sources incomplete or inaccurate or missing. Writing style difficult to understand. |
The extent to which the assignment concludes by drawing together the key issues and opportunities for responsible marketing including ethics and sustainability (10%).
|
Outstanding assignment that fully meets the marking criteria, shows clear understanding and application of theory from the IPORM course and exhibits a superior level of analysis given the constraints of the word count. |
Excellent insight into key issues and opportunities with respect to responsible marketing including, where appropriate, ethics and sustainability, both now and in the future. |
Very good insight into key issues and opportunities with respect to responsible marketing including, where appropriate, ethics and sustainability, both now and in the future. |
Competent insight into key issues and opportunities with respect to responsible marketing including, where appropriate, ethics and sustainability, both now and in the future. |
Inadequate analysis of key issues and opportunities with respect to responsible marketing including, where appropriate, ethics and sustainability, both now and in the future. |
Missing analysis of key issues and opportunities with respect to responsible marketing including, where appropriate, ethics and sustainability, both now and in the future. |
Buy Answer of MARK7045 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentNeed last-minute online assignment help with your MARK7045 Introduction to the Principles of Responsible Marketing Assignment? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Marketing Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment example and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content