| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Singapore University of Social Science (SUSS) | Module Title | LOG351 Lean Six Sigma for Supply Chains |
| Assessment Type | Group-Based Assignment |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | July 2025 |
| Submission Deadline | 3 October 2025, 2355hrs. |
This assignment is worth 20% of the final mark for LOG351 Lean Six Sigma for Supply Chains.
The cut-off date for this assignment is 3 October 2025, 2355hrs.
This is a group-based assignment. You should form a group of 4 members from your seminar group. Each group is required to: (1) upload one set of presentation slides via your respective seminar group site in Canvas; and (2) make an oral presentation. Please elect a group leader. The responsibility of the group leader is to upload the slides on behalf of the group.
It is important for each group member to contribute substantially to the final submitted work. All group members are equally responsible for the entire submitted assignment. If you feel that the work distribution is inequitable to either yourself or your group mates, please highlight this to your instructor as soon as possible. Your instructor will then investigate and decide on any action that needs to be taken. All group members don't need to be awarded the same mark.
Note to Students:
After the group presentation, there will be a Q&A session directed to each group member. Please respond to the questions in a clear and well-reasoned manner.
Marks awarded to your assignment are based on the following guidelines:
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (75-100) | Meet Expectations (50-74) | Needs Improvement
(0-49) |
| Understanding and
Application of Concepts |
Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts; applies them accurately and consistently in a variety of contexts. Connections are clearly articulated and insightful. | Demonstrates adequate understanding of concepts; applies them
in a generally accurate way. Some connections may lack depth or clarity. |
Demonstrates limited or flawed understanding; misapplies concepts or fails to make relevant connections. Work lacks coherence. |
| Analysis and
Critical Insights |
Demonstrates advanced analytical thinking; offers original and perceptive insights; recognizes complexity and nuances in issues. | Demonstrates basic analytical thinking; some insights are offered but may be surface-level or inconsistent.
Evaluations may lack |
Demonstrates minimal analysis; tends to describe rather than critically evaluate. Insights are simplistic or absent. |
| Evaluations are wellsupported. | depth or full justification. | ||
| Problem
Solving and Innovation |
Generates creative and effective solutions to complex problems; shows flexibility in thinking and willingness to explore alternative approaches.
|
Generates workable solutions to common problems; demonstrates basic reasoning and occasional creativity. Tends to rely on conventional approaches. | Struggles to identify viable solutions; responses are often simplistic, incomplete, or lack logic. Little evidence of innovation. |
| Independent
Research and Use of Sources |
Conducts thorough independent research using diverse, credible sources; integrates evidence seamlessly and critically; adheres to citation standards. | Conducts sufficient research using mostly relevant sources; integration and citation of evidence is generally accurate but may lack critical synthesis. | Demonstrates minimal independent research; uses few or unreliable sources; integration is weak or inappropriate; citations may be missing or incorrect. |
| Organisation and Visuals | Content is logically structured and clearly organised. Key points are concise, accurate, and well-supported. Visuals are welldesigned, and enhance understanding through effective use of layout, fonts, and colours. | Content is generally organised and clear, with minor lapses in flow or conciseness. Visuals are adequate but may lack some refinement or impact. | Content lacks logical structure or clarity. Key points are incomplete, inaccurate, or disorganised. Visuals are poorly designed or distracting. |
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (75-100) | Meet Expectations (50-74) | Needs Improvement
(0-49) |
| Delivery | Delivery is highly engaging, clear, and confident. Effective use of voice, eye contact, posture, and gestures maintains audience engagement. Time is well managed. | Delivery is understandable and generally smooth. Some lapses in clarity, engagement, or nonverbal communication. Time management is mostly on track. | Delivery is unclear, hesitant, or rushed. Limited or ineffective use of voice and body language. Poor time management or failure to engage audience. |
| Team
Outcomes |
Team consistently delivers high-quality output and meets all deadlines reliably. Demonstrates strong | Team delivers acceptable output and meets most deadlines. Shows moderate collective engagement. | Team output is of low quality and/or often late. Poor coordination and limited ownership evident. |
| collective ownership and performance. |
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (75-100) | Meet Expectations (50-74) | Needs Improvement (0-49) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Response | Responds to questions accurately and confidently, offering clear reasoning and demonstrating strong understanding. Effectively engages and persuades the audience. | Responds adequately to most questions, though some explanations may lack depth or clarity. Shows moderate confidence and understanding. | Struggles to answer questions clearly or accurately. Responses lack confidence, reasoning, or audience engagement. |
READ Case Study: A Lean Management Approach at The Food Bank Singapore.
(a) Examine specific challenges related to food waste in Asia that prompted the rise of food banks, and how these organisations address the issue.
(b) Recommend how The Food Bank Singapore can integrate Lean management principles into its operations. Highlight some specific projects/initiatives that exemplify the implementation of lean management and what the benefits are.
(c) How crucial is the Voice of Customers (VOC) in the context of a charity organisation like The Food Bank Singapore? What specific benefits does it offer?
(d) Propose any three (3) Lean Six Sigma techniques from the following list that can be used in the Root Cause Analysis of a challenge that The Food Bank Singapore is facing:
(e) Suggest how each technique from the given list can be used in sequence to identify potential solutions to this challenge:
Struggling with LOG351 assignments and feeling stressed?
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentHaving trouble completing your LOG351 Lean Six Sigma for Supply Chains assignment on time? Our Supply Chain Management Assignment Help service is the best for you! Our expert writers offer high-quality, plagiarism-free, and AI-free assignments at pocket-friendly rates. You can even check our free assignment samples before placing your order. We promise on-time delivery and 24/7 support, no matter your academic needs. From Business Management to technical subjects, we cover it all.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
