| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Northumbria University Newcastel | Module Title | LD9627 Developing Academic Skills for Business & Management |
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |
|---|
|
Module Code |
LD9627 |
Module Title |
Developing Academic Skills for Business & Management |
|
Statement of task |
This assessment invites you to address the following task: |
||
|
Time Limit |
10-15 min |
||
|
Weighting |
The part 2 individual presentation accounts for [50]% of the total mark for this module |
||
|
Submission Time and Date |
Week 12 |
||
|
Submission of Assessment |
This is an individual presentation. You have to prepare a PPT presentation and deliver it to the class. You should also submit the PPT slides (in the turnitin link) before your individual presentation in the class. Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA): Please note if your assignment is submitted electronically it will be submitted online via Turnitin by the given deadline. You will find a Turnitin link on the module’s eLP site. |
||
|
Provision of feedback |
Written feedback will be provided on TBC |
||
This assessment requires you to prepare an individual presentation that will be delivered in Week 12 of your programme. Your mark for this assessment forms 50% of your overall module score.
You are required to undertake a review of the literature on a contemporary business and management issue of your choice. You will present your review within an individual PowerPoint presentation which lasts between 10-15 minutes. At the end of your presentation, you will be required to answer questions from the audience.
Marks for this assessment will be allocated as follows:
Prior to delivering your presentation you must submit a copy of your PowerPoint slides with completed notes pages to your tutor. The notes pages should detail the key points that you will be covering within your verbal presentation.
For quality assurance purposes all presentations will be digitally recorded.
Do You Need LD9627 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentYou should refer to these assessment criteria within this rubric for detailed guidance on how you will secure marks for this assessment
|
Marking Rubric for Part 1 Individual Assignment (50% weighting |
|||||||
|
|
Does not meet Standards |
Meets Standards |
Exceeds Standards |
||||
|
|
Completely insufficient |
Insufficient |
Adequate |
Good |
Very Good |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
|
|
0-29% |
30-39% |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-79% |
80-100% |
|
Critical review of the literature (70%)
|
Poor grasp of topic concepts or of awareness of what concepts are.
|
Minimal awareness of subject area. |
Knowledge is adequate but limited and/or superficial. In the most part, description/ assertion rather than argument or logical reasoning is used. Insufficient focus is evident in work presented. |
Sound comprehension of topic. Reasoning and argument are generally relevant but not necessarily extensive. Awareness of concepts and critical appreciation are apparent, but the ability to conceptualise, and/or to apply theory is slightly limited. |
Knowledge base is up-to-date and relevant, but also may be broad or deep. Higher order critical appreciation skills are displayed. A significant ability to apply theory, concepts, ideas and their inter-relationship is illustrated. |
Knowledge and understanding is comprehensive both as to breadth and depth. A mature ability to critically appreciate concepts and their inter-relationship is demonstrated. Clear evidence of independent thought. Presentation of work is fluent, focused & accurate. |
Exceptional scholarship for subject. Outstanding ability to apply, in the right measure, the skills necessary to achieve highly sophisticated and fluent challenges to received wisdom. |
|
Quality of presentation slides and delivery (20%) |
Slides are very difficult to follow. The formatting of the slides is weak. Communication is inarticulate and/or incomprehensible |
Slides do not cover all of the essential information. The formatting of the slides is poor. Communication of knowledge frequently inarticulate and/or irrelevant. |
Slides contain relevant information but would have benefitted from more detail. The formatting of the slides is acceptable Communication of knowledge is adequate but limited and/or superficial. |
Slides contain a good level of detail. The formatting of the slides is of a reasonable standard. Sound communication of knowledge, |
Slides contain a very good level of detail. Good communication of knowledge. The formatting of the slides is of a good standard.
|
Slides contain an excellent level of detail. Very good communication of knowledge The formatting of the slides is of a very good standard.
|
Slides contain an exceptional level of detail. Excellent communication of knowledge. The formatting of the slides is of an excellent standard.
|
|
Response to questions from the audience (10%) |
Unable to respond to questions from the audience. |
Poor response to questions from the audience. |
Adequate but insufficiently detailed response to questions. |
Sound response to questions from the audience. |
Good response to questions from the audience. |
Very good response to questions from the audience |
Excellent response to questions from the audience. |
Detailed assessment guidance will be given in Week 1 and 6 Seminar. The Seminar will provide advice on
You are reminded that recorded assessment guidance will be provided on the eLP Blackboard site for this module after Week 6 sessions.
In alignment with Northumbria University’s Academic Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA), section 1.2, you are reminded that “In all assessed work students should take care to ensure that the work presented is their own and that it fully acknowledges the work and opinions of others”.
Unless the assessment specific guidance above requests that you use generative AI in crafting your assessment, AI should not be used to do the core work for you. You should assume that generative AI may be used as follows:
Further guidance regarding using AI responsibly and ethically can be found in your student portal here.
When you submit your assessment, you will be requested to add and sign a declaration of your use of AI in the creation of your work. A copy of this declaration document is attached to the end of this document. You should place this signed copy at the front of your submission. Failure to accurately record your use of such tools may be considered as academic misconduct.
As part of the preparation for writing your assessment, you should familiarise yourself with the following policies, all of which can be found here:
Order Custom Answers for LD9627 Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentNeed last-minute online assignment help with your LD9627 Developing Academic Skills for Business & Management Assignment? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Business & Management Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment examples and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content