| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Cardiff Metropolitan University (CMU) | Module Title | ISC7002 Supply Chain Management |
| Word Count | 2400 words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | WRIT2 Individual Coursework (Main) |
| Academic Year | 2024-2025 |
| Semester: | 2 |
This includes elements of the Cardiff Met EDGE (Ethical, Digital, Global and Entrepreneurial skills) and other attributes developed in students through the completion of the module and assessment. These will also be highlighted in the module guidance, which should be read by all students completing the module. Assessments are not just a way of auditing student knowledge. They are a process that provides additional learning and development through the preparation for and completion of the assessment.
General/transferable skills:
Do You Need ISC7002 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment|
Marking Criteria |
|
|
<39 |
Unsatisfactory Little or no evidence of understanding of the topic. Little evidence of synthesis or reflection. Information largely irrelevant and not contextualized to the given scenario. Structure/ calculations/ graphs / style / grammar wrong and or poor. |
|
40-49 |
Fail Some relevant material provided and a partially successful attempt is made to contextualize the information. Little attempt to relate this to the assignment brief and shows limited understanding of the subject material. Little or no reference to literature. Expression/calculations/graphs/style/grammar/ balance weak. |
|
50-59 |
Pass Shows a satisfactory knowledge and understanding of the essentials of the subject to create a clear, well-structured account. Lacks breadth and/or depth. Demonstrates an ability to solve limited, defined, problems. Sources of information other than lecture notes and set texts have been used. Calculations correct |
|
60-69 |
Merit/Good pass Shows a good knowledge and understanding of the subject with no major gaps or omissions. Displays ability to analyse, interpret and organise information to produce coherent accounts or solve problems. Evidence of wider reading beyond lecture notes and standard texts is provided. |
|
70> |
Excellent / Outstanding/Distinction Work displaying a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the subject together with the ability to evaluate critically selected aspects of current knowledge and to suggest original solutions to problems which can be complex. Evidence of wider reading which includes research papers and reviews is shown. |
|
Level 7 |
80%-100% (Distinction+) |
70%-79% (Distinction) |
60%-69% (Merit) |
50%-59% (Pass) |
40%-49% (Narrow Fail) |
20-39% (Clear Fail) |
1-19% |
|
Overall summary |
Excellent (80-89%) or outstanding and exceptional (90-100%)Beyond level 7 Worthy of publication |
Very good
|
Good
|
Threshold |
Not met some learning outcomes/assessment criteria
|
Not met many learning outcomes/assessment criteria
|
No learning outcomes are met in full
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knowledge & Understanding |
Exceptional mastery of subject/research
|
Subject knowledge and understanding full and detailed. Mastery demonstrated Can extend, transform and apply knowledge Awareness of limitations of knowledge Sophisticated discussion Independent thinking and action. Original insights |
Full subject knowledge and understanding. Mastery demonstrated Can extend, transform and apply knowledge Discussion of complex concepts is often tackled successfully Some independent thinking and action |
Basic but secure subject knowledge and understanding. Mastery demonstrated Frequently descriptive and based on given sources Limited independent thinking and action |
Limited subject knowledge and understanding Factual inaccuracies, errors and misconceptions in important areas Irrelevant content
|
Little subject knowledge and understanding Factual inaccuracies, errors and misconceptions outweigh knowledge and understanding Substantially irrelevant |
Work may be: short irrelevant contain serious/numerous errors and misunderstandings no evidence of analysis, synthesis, critical evaluation and reflection no reference/minimal reference to external sources very poor presentation and inappropriate format very poor communication of information and ideas 0% – Absent/ work not submitted, penalty in some misconduct cases |
|
Presentation and communication |
Eloquent and professional style |
Coherent and succinct Presentation standard high Logically organised Arguments are well-defined and clearly articulated |
Clear and succinct Well presented Appropriately organised |
Satisfactory communication Lacks academic rigour Describing and reporting factual information Appropriately structured |
Confused and clumsily expressed. Unclear
|
Limited ability to communicate. Unclear, clumsy and inappropriate. |
|
|
Analysis & discussion |
Extensive and independent enquiry to solve problems |
Detailed analysis and critical enquiry Expertise in highly specialised and advanced technical, professional and/or research skills Highly successful in presenting, synthesising and commenting on research process and outcomes Insight on the relationship between theory and practice |
Some detailed analysis and critical enquiry Expertise in highly specialised and advanced technical, professional and/or research skills Considerable success in presenting and commenting on research process and outcomes Some linkage between theory and practice |
Some limited analysis and critical enquiry Limited expertise in highly specialised and advanced technical, professional and/or research skills Some success in presenting and commenting on research process and outcomes
|
Some enquiry/analysis but research process and outcomes may be naïve, simplistic and/or unconvincing |
Little evidence of being able to undertake enquiry/ analysis Outcomes may be inappropriate, or absent |
|
|
Research / scholarship |
Insight and critical awareness of research/scholarship Substantial range of reference citations, beyond expectations |
Detailed, thorough knowledge and systematic understanding of current research/advanced scholarship The use of scholarly reviews/primary sources is sophisticated Referencing accurate and reading/investigation beyond sources provided Ability to determine, refine, adapt and use research knowledge and skills |
Thorough knowledge and understanding of current research/scholarship Ability to design research/apply methods/knowledge/skills The referencing almost always accurate and reading/investigation beyond sources provided Ability to determine, refine, adapt and use research knowledge and skills |
Some knowledge of research/scholarship/application of methods/skills and their implications Some errors in referencing Over-reliance on given sources |
Limited or sporadic knowledge of research/scholarship Application largely unsuccessful Frequent errors in the referencing Over-reliance on programme materials
|
Little knowledge and understanding research/scholarship. Failure to apply this knowledge Frequent errors in the referencing Reading and investigation negligible |
|
|
Structured argument and critical evaluation |
May challenge the boundaries of knowledge Innovative and/or creative thinking New insights informed through critical evaluation |
Critical evaluation and informed judgements Clear recognition of the complexities of academic debate. Arguments are well developed, sustained and substantiated Appropriate and sometimes innovative solutions are offered to problems There is strong evidence of effective reflection on student’s practice and consideration for future development |
Critical evaluation and reflection Arguments are clearly considered and substantiated Appropriate judgements and solutions offered to problems Ability to reflect on student’s practice and plan future development |
Limited ability to critically evaluate and reflect Arguments substantiated but under-developed Descriptive and factual presentation favoured Limited and superficial reflection with little consideration for future development |
Little evidence of critical evaluation and reflection Arguments rarely substantiated Largely descriptive Self-evaluation and reflections are extremely limited |
Some ability to describe and report but very little evidence is available to indicate an ability to engage in critical evaluation and reflection Self-evaluation and reflections on the students’ own practice are negligible or absent |
|
Hire Experts to solve ISC7002 Assignment before your Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentSeeking help with your ISC7002 Supply Chain Management Assignment? now be free and get Professional Help With Supply Chain Management Assignment from our expert team. We also provide free assignment samples that have been written by PhD expert writers. We are available 24/7 to assist you. Now, be tension-free and focus on studying and give your assignment to our expert team. We will deliver your assignment before the deadline with well-researched results. Contact us today and boost your academic grades!
See the solutions of this brief click here: ISC7002 Assignment Sample
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
