HR7004 Mental Wealth: Professional Exchange And Applied Research L7 Assessment Guide Term 3 2024-25

HR7004 Assessment Tasks:

HR7004 Assessment 1: Professional Learning Badges (30 %) - Specifications

This assessment is based on a learning ‘badge’. keeping in mind that a learning badge is a certificate that a person will get when an institution validates the accomplishment of a learning activity such as workshop, conferences, social work or any educational strategy. The badges to be learned and earned are in alignment with engagement, mental wealth competencies and employability parameters.
The Badges would be earned from the LinkedIn Learning platforms. The details are as follows:

Marking criteria:

You will get guidance in your Seminars and on the HR7004 MOODLE page that you MUST follow – this will show you how to use your UEL LinkedIn Learning Account (do not use your personal LinkedIn account for this – for reasons that will be made clear) – and show you how to access the correct courses to achieve your certificates.

HR7004 Assessment 2: I– Specifications: Research Proposal (24%)

Research Proposal is divided into two sections and together they carry 40% of total marks

1. Research Proposal written assignment.
2. Multiple Mini Interviews.

Research Proposal written assignment: 

1. This assignment is compulsory for all students enrolled in the HR 7004 course.
2. You are expected to present a Research Proposal in 1500 words, the marking criteria of which are given below.
3. The Research Proposal can be submitted on any topic or area of study related to the student’s program or specialisation. 

Marking criteria:

HR7004 Assessment 3: Reflective Account (30%) – Specifications

This is a 1,500 word reflective account:

This is a personal reflection about you, and should be written in the an academic reflective style. 

Firstly for breadth, you will reflect briefly upon your experience of this module HR7004. This section will briefly list what you learned each week (focusing on a max of 3 weeks), what engaged you, what surprised you and how it will potentially impact your employability or wealth creation. Support your statements with a suitable example from your professional or academic experience and reference theory to credible academic sources. (‘citethemright’ Harvard referencing style)

For depth of reflection, you will reflect in depth through the application of a reflective model. 

This would be the In-Depth analysis of ONE of the mental wealth competencies. How you are more aware of the situation and in the light of your increased awareness of the mental wealth competencies through HR7004. The reflection should finally record how this mental wealth competency will potentially impact your Employability, Professional Fitness and Wealth creation. Your future course of action in terms of acquiring or further developing the chosen mental wealth competency should also be elaborated

Choose ONE of the models listed below and apply it in full, to properly structure your reflective report. 

• Gibb’s Reflective Model: https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/media/MyCumbria/Documents/ReflectiveCycleGibbs.pdf
• Kolb’s Reflective Model:
  https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/media/MyCumbria/Documents/Library/Kolb.pdf

IMPORTANT ADVICE- You are NOT expected to write extensive descriptions of the reflective models, you are only expected to apply them to structure your work 

Please ensure to watch this 6 minute video to get a better understanding of reflective writing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoI67VeE3ds

Marking criteria for the reflective account:

Your reflection will be related to your awarding body’s requirements in these areas, will refer to relevant academic sources and theories, and will identify future learning outcomes based on your reflection. The criteria to evaluate in a reflective writer are: (1) Critique; (2) Usage of reflective framework to conduct  in-depth analysis (3)  and Clarity and professional writing. See below the marking and word count. Introduction (50 words), Critique (800), In-depth using reflective model (600) and conclusion (50 words)

Marking criteria: