Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Roehampton | Module Title | HEPL017 Malnutrition and Advances in Nutritional Care |
Academic Year | Autumn 2025 |
---|
Assessment title | Weighting | Due Date |
Annotated Bibliography |
30% |
BEFORE 2 pm 28th November |
Case Study with reflection |
70% |
BEFORE 2pm 9th January |
Outcome | Assessed by |
Have an advanced, critical, evidence-based understanding of assessing nutritional status within the context of malnutrition. |
Annotated Bibliography |
Discuss factors that influence diet and nutritional needs, intake, and practices, including disease, nutrition, health, and digital literacy, religious and cultural beliefs, socio-economic, geographical, and environmental sustainability factors. |
Case study |
Apply a person-centred approach and appropriate communication skills throughout all areas of nutrition practice. Be able to systematically organise and communicate advanced healthcare information. |
Case study |
Critically reflect on their nutrition practice and demonstrate ethical and professional practice through upholding the UKVRN Standards of Ethics, Conduct and Performance |
Case study |
Assessment 1.
What is An Annotated Bibliography? Some annotated references:
where each reference is followed by a 300-word descriptive and evaluative paragraph, i.e., ‘the annotation’. The purpose is to inform the reader of the relevance and quality of your selected studies.
Select one ORIGINAL STUDY for EACH of the following topics,
1. A malnutrition screening tool in a hospitalised patient group.
Guidance: Hospitalised patient group can include adults, infants, children, or the elderly.
2. Handgrip strength as a method for assessing nutritional status.
3. Vitamin D intake or status in care or nursing home residents.
4. Oral nutritional supplement drinks (ONS) intervention in children
Guidance: “Oral Nutritional Supplements drinks (ONS) are sterile liquids, semi-solids or powders, which provide macro and micronutrients.” BAPEN
5. Enteral tube feeding for critical care patients
Present the reference in Harvard style and write a 300-word annotation for each study selected.
There are many relevant ORIGINAL studies for each topic; we are not looking for a particular study, just one that fits the topic.
Assessment Criteria:
Study details (50% of marks)
Inclusion of an introductory sentence.
Useful methods to be able to communicate the quality of the study.
Key results relating to the topic, including values and significance if available. For example, the mean, standard deviations, and p values: “During the dietary intervention phase, dietary glycaemic index decreased from 54.5±3.5 to 48.6±5.1 (P<0.001)”.
Critical analysis (40% of marks)
Inclusion of specific study methods/ design limitations and strengths, for example, “only recruited white males.”
Overall communication of information (10% of marks)
Followed guidelines, reference complete as per Harvard style, clearly presented information, well organised in a formal/ scientific writing style, within word limit (+/- 10%)
Assessment 2.
Date Due: BEFORE 2 pm 9th January
Word Count: 3,500 words excluding references
Details: Case study with reflection
Evidence-based recommendations & awareness of patient circumstances (2,000 words, excluding reference list:
1. Choose ONE case study
This service user has come to see you. Answer the following:
2. What additional questions would you ask/ additional information would you like to inform your decision-making for person-centred care?
Demonstrate an understanding of the needs of individuals, incorporating financial, religious, and cultural awareness.
3. Based on evidence-based practice, what recommendations would you make – give detailed reasons for the decision.
Include relevant national/ international guidelines on the dietary and lifestyle management of the clinical condition, as well as any relevant studies published after the guidelines were published.
Include critical awareness: for example, useful study details to communicate your awareness of the quality of your sources of information.
Include references for all your sources of information.
Reflect how your proposed action adheres to the following AfN standards of ethics, conduct, and performance (750 words, excluding AfN statements:
UKVRN Standards of Ethics, Conduct & Performance
Provide a Continual Professional Development (CPD) reflection and plan to stay up to date: 750 words
Reflect on how the assignment as a CPD activity has impacted you
Reflection is the process of thoughtfully considering and evaluating your actions, experiences, and learning to gain deeper insights and improve future practice. …reflection is a crucial tool for personal and professional development, allowing you to assess how your knowledge, skills, and behaviours align with best practices. It encourages continuous learning, promotes self-awareness, and fosters the ability to adapt and grow in response to new evidence or challenges. Integrating reflection into your CPD provides essential context by helping to connect your learning to real-world practice. You can enhance your effectiveness, ensure high standards of care, and stay current with evolving trends and research in the field of nutrition
CPD Requirements for UKVRN Registrants - Association for Nutrition Page 11
How do you propose to stay up to date on this topic in the future? Provide a short plan with examples of courses/conferences you could attend online or in person, and websites you could visit
CPD Requirements for UKVRN Registrants - Association for Nutrition Page 9 for examples of CPD
Assessment Criteria:
Scientific Content & awareness of patient circumstances (60% of marks)
National/ international guidelines on the dietary management of the clinical condition and any relevant studies published since publication.
Include critical awareness of the quality of your information sources.
Demonstrates an understanding of the needs of individuals, incorporating financial, religious, and cultural awareness.
Reflection on how the proposed action adheres to the following AfN standards of ethics, conduct, and performance (15% of marks)
Continual Professional Development (CPD) reflection and plan to stay up to date (15% of marks)
Overall communication of information (10% of marks):
Followed guidelines, reference complete as per Harvard style, clearly presented information, well organised in a formal/ scientific writing style, within word limit (+/- 10%)
Sometimes circumstances outside of your control may affect your studies, e.g., illness or family issues. In these cases, you can always talk to your Academic Guidance Tutor, the Student Union, or someone in the Wellbeing team for advice.
If you need additional time to complete an assessment or defer work to the next submission date, you can submit a request via the mitigating circumstances portal.
You can find the portal and more details on the NEST: Mitigating Circumstances
The options:
1) Self - Self-Certification Request: 1 week extension, no supporting evidence is required. You can only request a self-certification once a year, but you must log your request through the mitigating circumstances portal.
2) Extension: 2-week extension, supporting evidence is required (except for students with SOAs).
3) Deferral: Coursework is deferred to the next examination and assessment period. Supporting evidence is required.
(NB. if a deferral is granted, this may impact your graduation date, or could increase your workload in the next assessment period. If you are an international student, you should also consider visa restrictions.
If you do not submit a request for Mitigating Circumstances (and you don’t have a SoA), or if your request is not approved, late penalties will apply.
You must log all requests through the mitigating circumstances portal
Descriptors | Grade | % | Degree equivalent |
Outstanding |
A+ |
80+ |
Distinction |
Excellent |
A |
70 – 79 |
|
Good |
B |
60 – 69 |
Merit |
Satisfactory |
C |
50 – 59 |
Pass |
Weak |
D |
40 – 49 |
Fail (may be condonable) |
Unsatisfactory |
F |
0 – 39 |
Fail |
Grade Categories and Generic Assessment Criteria (M Level) | |
100 |
An assessment that could not be bettered within the time available |
92 85 82 |
Distinction work in this range demonstrates:
|
78 75 72 |
Distinction work in this range demonstrates:
|
68 65 62 |
Merit work demonstrates:
|
58 55 52 |
The pass work demonstrates:
|
48 45 42
|
Condonable Fail work demonstrates:
|
38 35 25 15 5
|
Failure in this range demonstrates:
|
0 |
Fail work of 0 demonstrates:
|
Do You Need HEPL017 for the Assignment of This Question
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentStruggling with your HEPL017 Malnutrition and Advances in Nutritional Care assignment? Let us help! Our Science Assignment Help service is the best for you. We offer professional, affordable assignment writing services that are AI-free, plagiarism-free, and delivered on time. Our team of PhD experts understands what universities expect and creates high-quality content tailored to your needs. We also offer free assignment samples, allowing you to review our quality before booking. We’re available 24/7 to support you with Business Management or any subject. Don’t wait until the last minute—contact us now and make your academic life easier with trusted expert help! We also provide University of Roehampton Assignment Samples that the phd expert writers have written. Contact us now!