| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Griffith College Dublin | Module Title | Medical Device Technology – Group Assignment |
| Word Count | 3,500 -4,500 |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |
| Subject: | Medical Device Technology – Group Assignment | |
| Assignment Title | Design and development of a Novel Medical Device | |
|
The Learning outcomes for this module are as follows: (i) M1_LO1 Research the medical device product life cycle phases from product design, development, validation, manufacturing, testing, packaging to distribution. (ii) M1_LO2 Critically assess the impact of mobile health (m-Health) and connected medical devices on the future direction of medical device design and development (iii) M1_LO3 Use learnings of human biology and disease to provide a rationale for scientific/technical procedures medical devices - in the diagnosis, treatment and basic research associated with human disease. (iv) M1_LO4 Assess the concepts of biocompatibility and the processes involved in biomaterials and biomechanics in the design of medical devices. (v) M1_LO6 Analyse the concepts of Quality Risk Management and determine how it can be applied to medical device design and manufacture. This Group Assignment accounts for 50% of the module grade and is designed to assess learners’ ability to research and critically evaluate key topics related to the medical device product life cycle. In accordance with MIMLO learning outcomes (i), (ii), and (v) - learners will explore and analyse each phase of the medical device life cycle—from product design, development, and validation to the integration of connected medical devices and emerging trends in the field. The assessment also requires a thorough understanding of the medical device design process and the application of Quality Risk Management (QRM) principles in alignment with regulatory standards. Successful completion of this assessment will require both independent and collaborative research, the application of relevant scientific principles, and the ability to communicate findings clearly and effectively through a group presentation. |
||
|
Level 1 (AI) for Planning is the acceptable level of AI for use in this assignment. Level 1 AI – for PLANNING - to form ideas, structure, and research) on the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale Framework is the acceptable. AI use permitted in this assignment |
Any AI process must be declared. - All AI use must be declared in provided Giffith College Cove Sheet page. - Learners must add an appendix showing the ideas, structures and recommended research given by an AI* Acceptable use in this level defined as: Idea Generation: Using AI to generate suggestion on specific topics that could be included in their assignment. The Learner would then have to research and write the assignment content without AI assistance. Structure: Asking AI to give an overview or to plan how to discuss the topic of the assignment (e.g. a short bullet points list). The learner would be required to take that list and expand it into a full assignment without further assistance from AI. Research: Asking AI for references to appropriate sources that discuss in topic. Learners would then be required to read those references. If any of the references are relevant to the assignment it should be then cited in the assignment work. AI summaries of any source are not permitted. |
|
Assignment Instructions:Students will be assigned to groups. Students are expected to work together to complete tasks. Part 2 of the assignment is done individually but must be aligned and consider the other sections of part 1 and 2 The report should include the following: - Griffith College Cover letter. - Additional cover letter containing title of report, Student Name & Student number & Date uploaded. - Each student must upload their report separately - Each student must identify what section of Part 2 they have completed - Each of the tasks below are addressed in separate sections: |
|
PART 1:In your pre-assigned groups identify a Novel Medical Device. This should be a device of a new design and be Class 2a or higher. Briefly describe the operating principles of the device, and a high-level strategy for how this device would be designed. Include the Intended Use and the Indications for Use for this device [ALL] [4+] Note: Maximum 4 pages; This section is to be completed by all group members together. |
30% |
PART 2:Risk Management - Describe the risk management approach that should be taken during development of the design. Give examples of potential risks and how these may be mitigated against. Include how a benefit risk analysis would be completed [STUDENT 1] [Group of 4+] Note: Maximum 4 pages. |
38% |
|
Design Inputs - Describe how the design requirements would be developed for this product. Consider how the environmental impact could be captured as part of the design effort. Give examples of the design inputs for this device that are based on its intended use. [STUDENT 2] [Group of 4+] Note: Maximum 4 pages |
|
|
Design Outputs - Describe how the manufacturer would generate the design output based on design inputs. Consider how the environmental impact could be captured as part of the design effort. Give examples of the design outputs for this device that are based on the design requirement. [STUDENT 3] [Group of 4+] Note: Maximum 4 pages. |
|
|
Design Verification - Describe the design verification strategy for this device and include detailed examples of how this maybe completed. Consider potential local and systemic responses to the device, with respect to biocompatibility [STUDENT 4] [Group of 4+] Note: Maximum 4 pages. |
|
|
Design Validation - Describe the design validation strategy for this device and include detailed examples of how this may be completed. [STUDENT 5] [Group of 5+] Note: Maximum 4 pages. |
|
|
Clinical Benefits – Describe the clinical benefits of the device, outlining any intended therapeutic or diagnostic benefits. Describe how you would demonstrate the clinical benefits. Consider the state of the art by completing an assessment of alternative treatment methods for the same indications. [STUDENT 6] [Group of 6] Note: Maximum 4 pages. |
|
PART 3:Presentation Present an executive summary of the device and the design effort. This should be completed in PowerPoint and include an overview of the medical device and how the product was designed and tested. [ALL] [Group of 4+] Note: Maximum 15 slides/15 minutes Presentation. |
25% |
PART 4References: Provide a reference section outlining your sources. Embed your citations in the body of the assignment texts – Use Harvard / Zotero referencing. Sources for the provided Tables, Figures and Pictures must be indicated. |
7% |
||
|
Format of the report. s Griffith College Cover page. s Additional cover page containing title of report, Student Name & Student number & Date uploaded. s Table of contents. s Acronym table. s Introduction. s Name and number of paragraphs. s Conclusion |
|
||
|
Assignment wordcount excluding bibliography: 3,500 -4,500 |
For Assignment - maximum / approximately 10 Pages (excluding title pages and references). For PPT presentation – minimum 2 slides per student / Presentation time is 15 minutes per Group. |
||
|
Total Marks for MDT Module 100%: |
50% Assignment II (Group Assignment) |
||
|
Submission details: |
Submit softcopy of Assignment to Turnitin Link on Moodle by - 23:45 on Sunday 7th of December 2025 Presentation Times: FT: 15th and 16th of December 2025 – Dublin. Exact times to be confirmed. PT: Dublin Cohort 11-Dec-25; Limerick Cohort 18-Dec-25. Exact times to be confirmed. Penalties for the late submissions will apply: Up to one week late – 10% taken off awarded mark Up to two weeks late – 20% taken off awarded mark More than two weeks late – mark capped at 40% |
||
| Criteria Descriptor | Part 1Selected Novel Device /Operating Principles / High-level strategy for how this device would be designed. | Part 2Intended Use, Classification FDA/EU/Clinical Benefit, Risk Management / Design Input/ Output/Verification/ Validation | Part 3 Group Presentation | Part 4Harvard Referencing |
| Weighting to Total100% | 30% | 38% | 25% | 7% |
| A (80-100) | Great clarity in the description of the selected Novel Device. Exceptionally well analysis and explanation of the main concepts in the development of the Novel Device, operating elements / principles of the device, and the strategy for how this device would be designed. Demonstrates evidence of extensive knowledge in the process of the Novel Medical Device development. Vastly Supports each of parameters with the reason. Accurate and comprehensive representation of the concept. | Excellent Research in the industry regarding Intended Use, Clinical Benefit/ Design Input/Output/Verification/ Validation / Design Control / Risk Management concepts in the selected novel medical device. Excellent clarity and precise description of the key attributes. All Concepts are clearly stated and extremely well embedded in the document. | Excellent abilities and qualities in the delivering a compelling Presentation. Excellent demonstrations of the work/ new concepts/new ideas and analytical skills. Has an advanced understanding of the process in the industry. Excellent logical support to each demonstrated sections. | Exceptional choice of relevant, top- quality sources for the assignment. All from peer reviewed sources and fundamental to the basic structure of the document. |
| B+ (70-79) | Very Good clarity in the description of the selected Novel Device. Very well analysis and explanation of the main concepts in the development of the Novel Device, operating elements / principles of the device, and the strategy for how this device would be designed. Demonstrates evidence of comprehensive knowledge in the process of the Novel Medical Development. Device development.Supports each of parameters with the reason. Accurate and comprehensive representation of the concept. | Very Good Research in the industry regarding Intended Use, Clinical Benefit/ Design Input/Output/Verification/ Validation / Design Control / Risk Management concepts in the selected novel medical device. Very Good clarity and precise description of the key attributes. All Concepts are clearly stated and very well embedded in the document. | Very good skills and qualities in the delivering of Presentation.Comprehensive demonstrations of the work/ new concepts/new ideas. Demonstrated very good understanding of the process in the industry. Provides very good logical support to displayed sections. | Very good choice of relevant, top- quality sources in the document. All from peer reviewed sources and fundamental to the basic structure of the document. |
| B (60-69) | Good clarity in the description of the selected Novel Device. Good explanation of the main concepts in the development of the Novel Device and operating elements. All concepts are analysed and described in a language that is mostly understood.Demonstrates evidence of good knowledge.. | Appropriate Research in the industry regarding Intended Use, Clinical Benefit/ Design Input/Output/Verification/ Validation / Design Control / Risk Management concepts in the selected novel medical device. Definitions of the key attributes and requirements are clearly stated and correctly embedded in the document. It is an accurate and comprehensive representation of the work. | Good skills and qualities in the delivering of Presentation. Appropriate demonstrations of the work/ new concepts/new ideas. Demonstrated good understanding of the process in the industry. Concept reasonably supported by the examples. | Good choice of relevant, quality sources, mainly peer reviewed, many of which are considered of top quality. |
| Criteria Descriptor | Part 1Selected Novel Device /Operating Principles / High-level strategy for how this device would be designed. |
Part 2Intended Use, Classification FDA/EU/Clinical Benefit, Risk Management / Design Input/ Output/Verification/ Validation | Part 3 Group Presentation | Part 4Harvard Referencing |
| Weighting to Total100% | 30% | 38% | 25% | 7% |
| C+ (55-59) | The explanation of the selected Novel Device is clear but needs additional interpretations and clarification.Some missing points and inaccuracies in the concept of the Novel Device Development / operating principles of the device.Generally, there is evidence of adequate research and reasoning but need more details. |
Research in the industry regarding Intended Use, Clinical Benefit/ Design Input/Output/Verification/ Validation / Design Control / Risk Management concepts in the selected novel medical device are incomplete / needs moreclarifications. Some information’s are not relevant / or limited to the consistency of the topic.There is some evidence of reasonable critical analysis and relevant research in the industry but need more details. | Reasonable skills and qualities in the delivering of Presentation.Demonstrates an understanding of the concept. Some information’s are limited or incomplete.There is some evidence of research and the logical support to displayed sections | Reasonable choice of relevant, quality sources, many peer reviewed, but could have chosen a little more selectively. |
| C (50-54) | The explanation of the selected Novel Development is provided but with limitations in the descriptions /operating principles of the device / missing points and inaccuracies in the concept of the Novel Device.There is some evidence of acceptable research and some reasoning but need more details and accuracies in the concept. |
Research in the industry regarding Intended Use, Clinical Benefit/ Design Input/Output/Verification/ Validation / Design Control / Risk Management concepts in the selected novel medical device are very limited / some data information’s are not relevant, or their review is not very clear.There are some relevant interpretations, that are related to the topics but need more accuracies in the descriptions. | Adequate presentation and analysis. Needs to develop their critical approach. Has demonstrated an understanding of the critical review process. Some interpretations are generally adequate but need more details. | While there are a passable number of references, a few of them are not relevant or their review is not very clear.Needs to select more from peer reviewed sources. |
| D (45-49) | The explanation of the selected Novel Device.Significant elements of missing points and inaccuracies in the operating principles of the device.The evidence of poor quality in the research and extremely limited information’sDoes not conform to the instructions. |
Research in the industry regarding Intended Use, Clinical Benefit/ Design Input/Output/Verification/ Validation / Design Control / Risk Management concepts in the selected novel medical device are poorly provided.Significant limitations in the provided research / some information’s are not relevant, or their review is not very clear.Does not conform to the instructions | Basic review, Statement of purposes and methods employed lucking some details. Does not conform to the instructions. Doesn’t appear to understand several the questions. Support for answers is basic and undeveloped. | Poor selection of sources. Many are from questionable sources. Lack of relevance to the research objective. |
| F (0-44) | The explanation of models is unclear with no evidence of research and description.Many of the answers are inappropriate demonstrating that the question is not understood |
Extremely limited evidence of a review of any research. There appears little evidence of an attempt beyond paraphrasing a list of articles and websites.There is little if any evaluation. | Insufficient description of the concept.Doesn’t conform to instructions. . Doesn’t support answers with reasons or reasons are inappropriate. | Very poor selection of sources. Many are from very questionable sources and are not particularly relevant. |
Struggling With Your Medical Device Technology Group Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?
Hire Assignment Helper Now!Need help with your Medical Device Technology – Group Assignment at Griffith College Dublin? Get expert guidance and improve your grades with our Assignment Help in Ireland. We provide clear explanations, step-by-step solutions, and a Free List of Assignment Samples to help you understand better. Our academic experts ensure your work is accurate, original, and well-structured. Make your learning journey easier and achieve academic success with our trusted support.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content