| Category | Assignment | Subject | Nursing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Personal Development Academy | Module Title | QUALIFI Level 4 F/505/9505 An Introduction to Healthcare Policy |
| Centre Name |
UK Professional Development Academy |
| Qualification | QUALIFI Level 4 Diploma in Health and Social Care |
| Unit Number and Title | F/505/9505 - An Introduction to Healthcare Policy |
|
Unit Level |
4 |
| Unit Type | Mandatory |
| Credit Value |
20 |
| Word Count | 2000 +10% |
| Grading Criteria |
Pass / Fail |
| Required Formatting | Use Times New Roman (Body) Font Style, Size 12 for Text, Size 13 (Bold) for Headings, 12 (Bold) for Subheadings, Justified alignment, single-spaced. |
|
Plagiarised Content Information |
Ensure your work is original and demonstrates your own understanding and research. |
| AI Content Information | All assignments must be entirely self-written. AI-generated content is strictly prohibited. |
| In-text Citation Requirement | You are required to include In-text citations for each assessment criterion and list all sources in a Bibliography section. |
| Assignment Grading Information | Submit your assignment by the deadline specified by your tutor. Early submissions will be marked within seven to ten working days from the official due date. |
| Student Declaration | Every coursework submission must include a Signed Learner Declaration confirming the authenticity of your work. |
This unit aims to develop learner awareness of different influences on healthcare and their effect on the development of policy. Evaluation of healthcare policy will allow learners to examine what the key contemporary issues are for those making policy, providers, and those receiving support. Please note that for learners working in or studying the qualification in the UK, their evidence in relation to legislation, regulations, codes of practice, etc, must be in a UK context. If learners are not in the UK, they must state the country they are referring to in relation to these areas.
| Assignment Title | An Introduction to Healthcare Policy |
| Assessment Requirements: | To achieve a “Pass” for this unit, learners must provide clear and sufficient evidence demonstrating that all learning outcomes have been met and that each assessment criterion has been fully addressed in accordance with the required standards. For practical tasks, learners will be directly observed and assessed by a qualified assessor where appropriate. |
LO1: Understand the significant historical and contemporary landmarks in healthcare provision in the UK.
LO2: Understand the theoretical frameworks, concepts, and models in developing policy.
LO3: Understand the impact of previous and current healthcare policy upon service user groups.
This assignment includes only knowledge-based criteria, which require you to write responses in your assignment worksheet.
|
Knowledge-Based Criteria: Learners are required to address these criteria in written form using the worksheet provided. |
|
| Learning Outcome: |
Assessment Criteria: |
| To achieve this unit, a learner must know and be able to: | Assessment of these outcomes demonstrates that a learner can: |
| LO1: Understand the significant historical and contemporary landmarks in healthcare provision in the UK. |
1.1 Summarise the main healthcare policy reforms introduced by the Labour Government from 1997. 1.2 Summarise the Conservative/ Liberal Coalition health agenda. 1.3 Discuss recent proposals in healthcare policy and their potential impact on service users. and how they can be overcome. |
| LO2: Understand the theoretical frameworks, concepts, and models in developing policy. |
2.1 Discuss the ideological backgrounds that can influence healthcare policy development. 2.2 Describe how stakeholders can influence policy development. |
| LO3: Understand the impact of previous and current healthcare policy upon service user groups. |
3.1 Discuss a policy developed during the coalition government and its impact on service users. 3.2 Explain the government’s policy on supporting service users with long-term conditions and its implications for service users. |
Healthcare provision in the UK has changed over time due to major political decisions. Understanding historical and current policies helps explain how care is delivered today and what influences these changes.
Labour Government reforms (1997–2010) included increased NHS funding, reduced waiting times, the introduction of NHS Direct, and investment in staff and technology. These changes aimed to modernise healthcare and make it more patient-focused.
Conservative/Liberal Coalition health agenda (2010–2015) focused on reducing costs, increasing competition, and giving more power to GPs. The Health and Social Care Act 2012 was a major reform, changing how NHS services were managed and funded.
Recent healthcare proposals include plans to integrate health and social care, increase digital access, and focus on prevention. These can improve services but may also bring challenges like funding gaps or staff shortages.
Ideological backgrounds refer to political beliefs that shape healthcare policy. For example, Labour often supports publicly funded care, while Conservatives may favour private sector involvement.
Stakeholders are people or groups who affect or are affected by healthcare policy. These include patients, professionals, the government, charities, and service providers. They can influence policy through feedback, campaigns, or consultation.
Healthcare policies impact service users in different ways. A policy from the coalition government, like the Health and Social Care Act, changed how services were organised, affecting how people accessed care.
Government policies on long-term conditions aim to give people more control over their health. This includes care plans, self-management support, and coordinated services. These policies help improve quality of life but depend on proper funding and trained staff.
|
|
Guidelines for Assignment Completion and Submission |
|
|
| Points to consider | Explanation | ||
| Academic Integrity and Authenticity Guidelines |
Learners must ensure that all submitted work is their own, authentic, and relevant to each assignment criterion. Plagiarism: using someone else’s work without proper referencing and collusion, submitting similar work with others are serious offences. Self-plagiarism, or reusing previously submitted work without approval, is also not allowed. Avoid relying on AI- AI-generated content, as it may lack originality and academic depth. Focus on aligning your responses with the specific action verbs in the criteria (e.g., evaluate, describe, explain). All submissions must include a statement of authenticity with a word count and a plagiarism similarity report using tools like Grammarly or ScanMyEssay. UKPDA recommends the following to check plagiarism/similarity. Learners are required to attach the similarity report in the submission slot or email it to the tutor. |
||
| Avoid Using AI-Generated Content | Refrain from relying on AI-generated content for your assignments. Such content lacks depth, originality, and relevance, and could lead to academic integrity issues. Focus on creating authentic work that reflects your own understanding and research. | ||
| Referencing and In-text Citation Requirements | Learners are expected to use the Harvard Referencing System to acknowledge all sources, methodologies, and applications used. In-text citations must be included for each criterion, with full references listed in the bibliography section, following correct Harvard formatting. Only use credible, peer-reviewed sources such as books, journals, and articles published within the last five years. Avoid unreliable sources like blogs, Wikipedia, or job sites. Proper referencing reflects academic integrity and ensures adherence to scholarly standards. | ||
| Relevance of Content | Align the content with each assignment criterion. Focus on the action verbs (e.g., assess, evaluate, identify, describe, demonstrate, explain) mentioned in the criteria and modify your responses accordingly. Irrelevant content will lead to a loss of marks and possible failure. | ||
| Duplication/self-plagiarism | Submitting work that largely repeats material previously graded for the same or another course, here or elsewhere, counts as self-plagiarism, unless it’s an improved version approved for reassessment. This is considered academic misconduct. | ||
| Material Proofreading | Use Microsoft Word's grammar and spell check, and the use of Grammarly is strictly prohibited due to its AI text-generation capabilities | ||
| ord Count Policy and Adherence | Learners must complete the assignment within the required word count of 2000 words, with a permitted margin of +10%. This word count excludes the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices, and reference list. Strict adherence to the word count is essential. Submitting significantly less may lead to failure, while exceeding the limit can affect clarity and assessment. Learners are advised to plan and structure their content effectively to meet both the word limit and the quality expectations. |
| Appendices | You may include appendices with supporting information, but they must be clearly referenced in your assignment. Tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt charts, and flowcharts that support your report should be added at the end of your submitted document. Any published sources, like annual reports or company literature, must be cited in the text using Harvard referencing and listed at the end of your assignment. |
|
Assignment Formatting Requirements |
Follow the formatting guidelines below. Use Times New Roman (Body) Font Style, Size 12 for Text, Size 13 (Bold) for Headings, 12 (Bold) for Subheadings, Justified alignment, single-spaced. Include the assessment criterion statement before each response for clarity. Proper formatting ensures a professional presentation and may impact your overall grade. |
| Paragraph Form and Suitable Headings | Avoid using unnecessary bullet points and short sentences. Instead, address each criterion in a well-structured paragraph with appropriate headings. This ensures clarity and coherence in your writing, making it easier for evaluators to follow your argument. Make sure that each criterion is clearly presented with proper formatting, including headings, paragraphs, and consistent style throughout. |
| Comprehensive Coverage of the Criteria according to the Assignment brief | Address all the criteria listed in the assignment brief. Missing any criterion could result in not achieving a passing grade. Make sure your response fully addresses and gives appropriate consideration to each criterion. Additionally, follow the additional guidelines or scenarios (if given) in the brief to stay relevant to the demand of the criteria. |
| Case Studies and Visual Aids (if applicable) | Incorporate relevant case studies, smart art, and figures to enhance the effectiveness of your content. This incorporation can make complex information more engaging, potentially earning you extra marks. |
|
Updated and Peer-Reviewed Sources |
Consult recent (within the past five years) peer-reviewed articles, journals, and books. Relying on current and credible sources enhances your arguments and shows that you are informed about the latest developments in your field. |
| Submission Regulations and Assignment Grading Information | You must submit your coursework online via the College’s Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) as a single electronic document in .docx format by the due date. Submissions will be graded within seven to ten working days after the deadline |
| Key Terminologies | |
| Describe | To describe means to create a picture with words, but not simply writing a list of bullet points. Your description should include relevant details that help the reader fully understand the subject. |
| Analyse | To analyse something means to examine it carefully and in detail to gain a deeper understanding or explanation. This involves identifying the key components or ideas of the subject and exploring the relationships and connections between them. |
| Evaluate | To evaluate, decide on your subject’s significance, value, or quality after carefully studying its good and bad features. Use authoritative (e.g., from established authors or theorists in the field) and, to some extent, personal appraisal of both contributions and limitations of the subject. Similar to assessing. |
| Discuss | To discuss in an essay, consider your subject from different points of view. Examine, analyse, and present considerations for and against the problem or statement. |
| Critically | Often used in conjunction with other directive words, such as critically discuss, critically examine, or critically analyse. It does not mean to criticise. It is asking you to give a balanced answer that points out mistakes or weaknesses and any favourable aspects of the subject of the question. The decision or overall judgment you make must be supported with evidence from reliable sources. |
|
Outline |
To outline is to give a clear and structured summary of the main points or stages of a topic. It should be brief, focused, and show the overall structure without going into deep detail. |
|
Compare |
To compare is to examine two or more items or ideas and highlight their similarities and differences. This may also include evaluating their significance or impact in a given context. |
| Identify | To identify means to clearly recognise and name specific facts, features, people, problems, or ideas. It often involves listing or pointing out key elements without needing to explain them in detail. |
| Describe | To describe means to create a picture with words, but not simply writing a list of bullet points. |
| Explain | To explain something, you will need to provide a clear account of your understanding, including details like why and how. |
Submit Your QUALIFI Level 4 F/505/9505 Assignment Questions & Get Plagiarism Free Answers
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentStruggling with your QUALIFI Level 4 F/505/9505 An Introduction to Healthcare Policy assignment? Let us help! Our Public Health Assignment Help service is the best for you. We offer professional, affordable assignment writing services that are AI-free, plagiarism-free, and delivered on time. Our team of PhD experts understands what universities expect and creates high-quality content tailored to your needs. We also offer free assignment samples so you can check our quality before booking. We’re available 24/7 to support you with Business Management or any subject. Don’t wait until the last minute—contact us now and make your academic life easier with trusted expert help!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content