ENGP5302 Control and Instrumentation Assignment Discussion Questions 2024-25

Published: 16 Aug, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Engineering
University De Montfort University Module Title ENGP5302 Control and Instrumentation

ENGP5302 Control and Instrumentation

The Rotary Inverted Pendulum Coursework 2024-25

Introduction

Over the course of Block 3, you will have familiarized yourself with the Rotary Inverted Pendulum system, produced a mathematical model, performed simulated analysis and carried out experimentation.

The coursework involves the production of a report that reflects your work and observations. This report carries 25% of the module mark for ENGP5302.

Structure

You are to write a report based around your laboratory work and a discussion question. The report should contain a minimum of 20 figures.

The report should comply with the following structure:-

Title Abstract

I Introduction

II System Model:

The equations, the Simulink model figure and system hardware figure are essential.

III Controller Design:

1)Linearization
2)Open-loop stability: is there a need for control?
3)Controllability: is the linearized model controllable?
4)Observability: is the system observable? Why is there no observer in the system?
5)State-feedback design
6)Zero-pole map as a figure

IV Simulation with discussion:

1)Model simulation (1 structure figure, free response with 11 figures, forced responses with 1 figure)
2)Closed loop simulation (1 structure figure, 2 figures with/without disturbances)

V Experimentation with discussion:

Performance of hardware (minimum of 2 figures with/without disturbance)

VI Discussion question

VII Conclusion and Future works References.

Appendix: Please compose a self-assessment statement. Please self-validate each section of your report claiming your expected mark each part of this assessment with reasons.

Submission Details

Your report will need to be submitted via Turnitin. Please note that you can only submit your report once so please check your work carefully before submitting it, ensuring it is the right version to submit. The submission deadline is 12:00 noon, 26/03/2025. Your report mark will be released on 16/04/2024.

Academic Offences

Academic offences are taken very seriously and can result in penalties ranging from failure in a component or assignment to expulsion from the university. For more details, please see:

De Montfort University

Any evidence of plagiarism, collusion or cheating in coursework, or misconduct in the examination, will be treated very seriously and in the first instance lead to referral to the Academic Practice Officer.

Are You Looking for Answer of ENGP5302 Assignment

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Marking Scheme

Criterion Description

A1. Report Format (5 marks) The layout of the report, references, etc

A2. Abstract (5 marks) The abstract should describe the report sufficiently.

1. Introduction (10 marks) The introduction should include background, motivation and applications.

2. System Model (5 marks) Modelling of the inverted pendulum system

3. Controller Design (20 marks) Including linearization, open-loop stability, controllability,

observability, full state-feedback design with pole assignment, closed-loop poles/zeros analysis, etc.

4a. Simulation Results (15 marks) All the figures as simulation results should be shown in the report.

4b. Simulation Discussion (10 marks) The analysis and discussion of the simulation results.

5a. Experimental Results (5 marks) All the figures as experimental results should be shown in the report.

5b. Experimental Discussion (5 marks) The analysis and discussion of the experimental results.

6. Discussion question (10 marks) Analysis of the discussion question

Conclusion (5 marks) Concluding statement with future work / recommendations. A3. Appendix (5 marks) This should, at the very minimum, include a self-appr

Figures

For clarity, you are recommended to submit your traces on a white background. Some of your plots will contain 4 traces; please remember to label all traces.

Discussion Question

During the laboratory sessions, you will have calculated an array of K (state feedback) coefficients to stabilize the pendulum. The LabView set-up has K coefficients programmed into its default configuration. Using your knowledge and simulation skills to evaluate both configurations, which of the two configurations provides the best solution and why?

DETAILED MARKING SCHEME

 

 

0

1-2

3-4

5

A1

Format

Format is not compliant. Sections are not numbered, there is no table of contents and no references.

Partial compliance. Sections correct. Some of the following in place: section numbering, table of

contents and references.

Reasonable compliance. Sections correct. Most of the following in place: section numbering, table of

contents and references.

Format is fully compliant, with correctly numbered sections, table of contents

and references.

 

 

0

1-2

3-4

5

A2

Abstract

No abstract.

Vague, mostly incomplete, or irrelevant abstract.

Comprehensive abstract with some details missing

Abstract comprehensively

and concisely describes report.

 

 

0-3

4-6

7-8

9-10

1

Introduction

None or entirely inappropriate.

Minimalist introduction with key points omitted and minimal referencing.

The introduction is comprehensive with a few errors and omissions. Reasonable referencing.

Excellent background introduction, motivation and applications for inverted pendulums. Excellent introduction to the laboratory apparatus. Good

referencing

 

 

0

1-2

3-4

5

2

System Model

None or inappropriate model.

Original model with minimal

additions.

Model developed with minor

errors. Clear presentation.

Correct model. Clear

presentation.

 

 

0-5

6-10

11-15

16-20

3

Controller Design

None, or analysis is entirely inappropriate.

A few of the following have been carried out: linear modelling, open- loop pole analysis, controllability analysis, observability analysis, state feedback, closed-loop pole analysis. Minimal critical analysis.

Most of the following have been carried out: linear modelling, open- loop pole analysis, controllability analysis, observability analysis, state feedback, closed-loop pole analysis. More extensive critical analysis.

Correct linear model. Correct open-loop pole analysis with deductions. Correct analysis on controllability and observability. Correct state feedback with confirmation

of the pole placement.

 

 

0-4

5-8

9-11

12-15

4a

Simulation Results

No traces, or traces that are inappropriate.

Only a few traces presented. The presentation and/or clarity is poor and not properly labelled.

The majority of the traces are presented. There may be deficiencies in the presentation, clarity or labelling.

A complete set of correct traces is provided. The traces are clear, well presented and properly

labelled.

 

 

0-3

4-5

6-8

9-10

4b

Simulation Discussion

None, or entirely inappropriate

Weak critical analysis of a few results including the effect of both friction values and mass for the free response, along with analyses of the forced and closed-loop responses. Ineffective discussion and the majority of points may

have been omitted.

Reasonable critical analysis of the majority of the results including the effect of both friction values and mass for the free response, along with analyses of the forced and closed-loop responses. Some points may have been omitted.

Comprehensive critical analysis of the results including the effect of both friction values and mass for the free response, along with analyses of the forced and closed-loop responses.

 

 

0

1-2

3-4

5

5a

Experimental Results

None, or entirely inappropriate

Relevant experimental results with errors or omissions. Not particularly clear and/or poor

labelling.

Reasonable experimental results with deficiencies in presentation.

Correct experimental results, clearly labelled and presented.

 

 

0

1-2

3-4

5

5b

Experimental Discussion

None, or entirely inappropriate

A description of the experimental results with little or no critical analysis, and no comparison with

the theoretical results.

Reasonable critical analysis of the results with little or no comparison with the theoretical results.

Excellent critical analysis of the results with good comparisons against the

theoretical results.

 

 

0-3

4-5

6-8

9-10

6

Discussion Question

None, or entirely inappropriate

An overview of the situation with some simulation and little or no critical analysis.

Reasonable critical analysis of the problem with some use of simulation, but no overall conclusion to this question.

Comprehensive critical analysis of the question, applying simulation skills, demonstrating good analysis and formulating a good

conclusion to this question.

 

 

0

1-2

3-4

5

7

Conclusion

No conclusion or totally inappropriate content.

Conclusion does not fully summarize report. Lack of future recommendations.

Reasonable summary of the report with some salient points missing or detail lacking for future

recommendations.

Conclusion fully summarizes report with good future recommendations.

 

 

0

1-2

3-4

5

A3

Self-appraisal

No self-appraisal.

Inaccurate self-appraisal with

inflated expectations.

Reasonable self-appraisal with

realistic / modest expectations.

Accurate self-appraisal.

Hire Experts to solve your ENGP5302 Assignment before Deadline

Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

Looking for the solution of the ENGP5302 Control and Instrumentation Assignment? Look no further! There are specialized professionals for all categories of assignments who offer you plagiarism-free and superior content. You are assured that our Automotive Engineering Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. A free list of assignment samples written by PhD experts is also provided here that can help you boost your study power and check the quality of the assignment. So contact us today and get your top-notch assignment!

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

Customer Experience Strategy CW4 Formative Assessment Report Example | BPP

Category: Report Writing Example

Subject: Management

University: BPP Business School

Module Title: Customer Experience Strategy

View Free Samples

BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan) Assignment Sample 2024-25, Sem3 | BCU

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Birmingham City University

Module Title: BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan)

View Free Samples

RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Roehampton

Module Title: RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management

View Free Samples

HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership AS2 Reflective Portfolio Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Northampton

Module Title: HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership

View Free Samples

ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: University of Greenwich (UOG)

Module Title: ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK