Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Strathclyde | Module Title | CS957 Research Methods |
Word Count | 3000 words +/- 10%. |
---|---|
Assessment Type | Research Proposal |
Academic Year | 2024-25 |
On completion of the summative assessment in this module, you will have experience of:
If you received a FAIL mark at first submission for CS957 Research Methods, you are required to RESIT the module.
For the CS957 Research Methods RESIT, you have one summative assessment to complete.
You are required to resubmit an improved version of your first submission of your CS957 Research Proposal.
You ARE NOT required to choose a new research topic for the resit submission. You must work with the project idea/topic already allocated to you.
You must work with the marking criteria feedback and markers' comments that you received for your first submission attempt to guide your improved effort for this resit.
You ARE NOT permitted to request a meeting with your allocated supervisor during the resit period to guide your resit research proposal preparation, and they ARE NOT permitted to review or comment on your revised proposal draft before submission.
The proposal resit assessment is marked on a PASS / FAIL basis. You must pass this resit assessment to pass the module. More information on this and your requirements is detailed in this document. Please read all the information in this resource carefully.
The intent of this module is for students to develop an understanding of key research concepts and a critical understanding of their research proposal. Students are expected to critically apply key concepts of research both within their proposal writing and throughout their actual dissertation.
As such, all assessments for CS957 Research Methods should be completed by students themselves and must not make use of material generated through ChatGPT or other generative AI tools. Students who make use of ChatGPT or other generative AI tools will be reported and investigated for suspected academic misconduct, and this may impact not only their marks for CS957 Research Methods but could also have wider implications on their degree progress.
For the resit summative assessment for CS957 Research Methods, you are required to prepare a structured proposal for a three-month research project.
Your proposal must follow the layout and structure of the provided template described under section 4d Research Proposal Template and Content Expectations.
The marking criteria are based on your ability to demonstrate the expected competencies in each required proposal section.
The marking criteria have been specified according to the proposal template, so if you follow the template and address the specified assessed competencies, the greater your chances of achieving an overall pass for this assessment.
Your proposal must be 3000 words long +/- 10% and you must provide the word count on the assessment front cover.
Your assessment front cover, contents page, figures, tables, diagram and reference list do not count within these 3000 words +/- 10%.
If your proposal is over 3300 words, you will not receive any marks for content beyond this limit, as it will not be assessed by the markers.
If your proposal is under 2700 words, you will receive marking penalties as it will be challenging for you to address the assessed competencies effectively in less than 2700 words.
You must use a referencing style fully and consistently for both in-text citations and your reference list. Please review the helpful and detailed information on the Library website about referencing, including details and examples of different referencing styles and formats.
The most common referencing styles you are likely to use in CIS disciplines are ACM, Harvard, Vancouver, IEEE or Chicago. Regardless of which style you adopt, you must use it consistently and correctly throughout your proposal for both in-text citations and your provided reference list at the end of your proposal.
This is an individual assignment.
Assessments will only be accepted electronically via Myplace as a single Word file on the CS957 Module Myplace RESIT submission link. All assessments will go through Turnitin.
You can submit a draft copy to Myplace before submitting the final version.
However, it is your responsibility to press SUBMIT on Myplace to send the final version of your proposal document for marking (i.e. do not leave at DRAFT status). You must do this.
The assessment will be subject to the University’s plagiarism and academic dishonesty policies.
Please familiarise yourself with the student information booklet on plagiarism from the University of Strathclyde.
Please familiarise yourself with the academic dishonesty guidance from the University of Strathclyde.
Your proposal content must be presented in the specified order, as outlined below under headings 1 - 6. Sections and pages must be numbered. You can use subheadings to help organise your material under each section if required.
Introduction and Literature Review
In this section, you are expected to do the following:
Research aim, objectives and research questions
In this section, you are expected to do the following:
Research Methods
In this section, you are expected to do the following:
Research plan and deliverables
In this section, you are expected to do the following:
Referencing
In this section, you are expected to do the following:
Achieve Higher Grades with CS957 Assignment Solutions
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentOverall presentation
To pass each proposal section (headings 1 - 6 above), you are required to demonstrate at least two of its expected competencies to achieve an overall pass for that section of the proposal.
To achieve an overall PASS mark for this assessment and therefore gain the 10 credits for this module, you are required to pass a minimum of 5 out of the 6 sections specified in this template and associated marking criteria.
You must submit your RESIT submission to the correct link on Myplace no later than Tuesday, 29th July 2025, 4 pm.
Please note, allocated markers will use this set of specified marking criteria to mark your proposal assessment. The marking criteria align to the specified template requirements outlined in your assessment brief.
Important: You are required to demonstrate at least two of the expected competencies in each proposal section outlined below to achieve an overall pass for that section of the proposal.
Important: You need to pass at least five of the six proposal sections to pass the CS957 Research Methods proposal assessment overall
Proposal Section |
Expected Competencies |
Demonstrated Yes / No |
||
1. Introduction and Literature review: |
Has the student clearly articulated the topic for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
||
Has the student demonstrated a thorough and critical understanding of literature relevant to their specific project? |
Yes / No |
|||
Has the student effectively identified from the literature review research gaps which their specific project aims to address? |
Yes / No |
|||
1. Section 1 overall outcome: |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
||||
2. Research aim, objectives and research questions |
Has the student clearly articulated a research aim appropriate for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
||
Has the student clearly articulated research objectives appropriate for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
|||
Has the student clearly articulated research questions relevant to and appropriate for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
|||
2. Section 2 overall outcome: |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
||||
3. Research methods |
Has the student selected an appropriate research methodology to address the research objectives and research questions for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
||
Has the student explained what methods are appropriate for them use and why to undertake their specific project? |
Yes / No |
|||
Has the student justified why the methods they have selected to undertake their research project are appropriate for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
|
Has the student described and justified why the data analysis approaches they have selected are appropriate for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
||
3. Section 3 overall outcome: |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
||||
4. Research plan and deliverables |
Has the student provided an appropriate timeline of activities via tabled time-plan or Gantt chart for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
||
Has the student provided a risk analysis for successful completion of their specific project and have they described appropriate contingency plans? |
Yes / No |
|||
Has the student appropriately specified and addressed any ethical issues relating to their specific project? |
Yes / No |
|||
Has the student identified deliverables appropriate for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
|||
4. Section 4 overall outcome: |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
||||
5. Referencing |
Has the student demonstrated an ability to adhere to in-text citation reference best practices consistently for their chosen recognised referencing style? |
Yes / No |
||
|
Has the student included an appropriately organised and structured reference list relevant to their chosen recognised referencing style. |
Yes / No |
||
|
Has the student included DOI numbers for each of the cited published journal papers / books / book chapters in their reference list? |
Yes / No |
||
5. Section 5 overall outcome: |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
||||
6. Overall presentation |
Has the student submitted a well-organised proposal with a logical progression of ideas for their specific project? |
Yes / No |
||
Has the student submitted a cover sheet that includes their information as appropriate: Research Project Title, Student Name, Student |
Yes / No |
|
Registration Number, MSc Programme, Date of Submission, Word Count. |
|
||
Has the student submitted a proposal that meets the specified brief of 3000 words +/- 10% (Excluding the assessment front cover, contents page, figures, tables, diagram and reference list)? |
Yes / No |
|||
6. Section 6 overall outcome: |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
||||
Overall assessment outcome (minimum 5 of out of 6 sections passed): |
|
|||
Markers, please provide a maximum of 3 feedback comments to the student on their proposal: |
Take our academic assistance & get 100% plagiarism-free papers
Buy Today, Contact UsAre you trying to find someone who can help with my CS957 Research Methods? Well! You're in the right place, our podium, Workingment provides Assignment Help UK. Our well-researched and talented professors can also provide you with odd assignments. Suppose you're judging whether to Write My Assignment with our professors. No doubt! Our team can help with your assignment. We also provide Free Sample assignments for your guidance. Get in touch right now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content