| Category | Assignment | Subject | Programming |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Elizabeth School of London | Module Title | CMP112 Programming Fundamentals |
| Assessment Type | Assessment 1: Presentation |
|---|
To provide students with opportunities to acquire technical skills and knowledge relating to programming.
LO 1: 1)Explain and discuss the purpose of software development methodologies.
|
Assessment: |
Power Point Presentation |
|
Weight: |
30% Marks |
|
Submission method: |
Moodle Turnitin |
|
Basic guidelines: |
You are to create a PowerPoint presentation that you will deliver, and you will record the presentation, upload on YouTube as unlisted video and share the YouTube link in the assessment submission file. The video file should last no longer than 10 minutes. The presentation should describe the purpose of software development methodologies and discuss the purpose and implementation of these methodologies. You should include examples of diagrams or images where appropriate to support your discussion that may demonstrate specific processes within the methodologies you look at. It is recommended to look at two methodologies for this presentation. You may choose from the following: · Waterfall · Agile (SCRUM, Kanban etc.) · Rapid · PRINCE2 Make sure you identify the key processes in your chosen methodologies and compare their differences/impact. You should include reference to research on your slides and add a reference slide at the end of the PowerPoint. You should upload your video to YouTube as an unlisted video and submit a text file with a link. Please see submission guidelines file available on Moodle. |
|
Assessment criteria: |
Content Clarity and Understanding (25%): Demonstrates clear understanding of chosen software development methodologies. Clearly explains purpose, implementation, and key processes. Presentation Design and Delivery (25%): Utilizes engaging and visually appealing PowerPoint design. Maintains clear and audible voice, speaking at an appropriate pace. Analysis and References (25%): Provides thorough comparison of methodologies. Supports discussion with references to credible sources. Organization and Time Management (25%): Presents information in logical, organized manner. Stays within 10-minute time limit, effectively managing time for each section. |
|
Learning and Teaching Strategies: |
Our philosophy of learning and teaching, our understanding of teaching for level 4 and NCG policies and strategies have all influenced our specific approach to learning and teaching for the level 4. Our teaching methods have been developed with explicit attention to debates pertaining to student learning styles. As such, our teaching methods provide a framework via which students develop the capacity to manage their own learning and evolve, over the course of their studies, into independent learners, acquiring the knowledge, understanding and skills that are essential to learning in Higher Education and to lifelong learning, post-graduation. Lectures, tutorials, and student-centred learning exercises will be employed. Practical sessions will support the learning of abstract concepts. Workshops and demonstrations will be organised in different topics to help the students master the necessary skills to develop their knowledge in these areas. Wherever possible, reference will be made to additional material and academic journals in the relevant field of computing. The VLE will be used to augment face to face teaching and learning with additional opportunities for learning and access to resources. There will be an introduction to the use of the library and a supportive tutorial framework to give individual support where required. |
Hire Experts to solve your CMP112 Assessment 1 before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentBooks
|
Mark |
General Grading Criteria |
Contextualised Criteria |
|
Exceptional Outcome: 90-100% |
All of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Exceptional grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Exceptional integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. |
Thoroughly and accurately explains the purpose of various software development methodologies. Demonstrates an exceptional grasp of theoretical, conceptual, and practical elements related to software development methodologies. Integrates theory, practice, and information seamlessly to achieve the presentation's objectives. |
|
Outstanding Outcome: 80-89% |
All of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Outstanding grasp of theoretical. /conceptual/practical elements. Outstanding integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. |
Accurately presents the purpose of software development methodologies. Displays an outstanding understanding of theoretical, conceptual, and practical aspects of software development methodologies. Integrates theory, practice, and information effectively to achieve the presentation's objectives at an outstanding level. |
|
Excellent Outcome: 70- 79% |
Most of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Excellent grasp of theoretical. /conceptual/practical elements. Excellent integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. |
Presents most of the relevant information about software development methodologies accurately. Shows an excellent understanding of theoretical, conceptual, and practical elements of software development methodologies. Integrates theory, practice, and information exceptionally well to achieve the presentation's objectives. Extremely accurate use of time available to present and answer questions. An excellent presentation using MS PowerPoint, excellent use of body language and clearly spoken at an appropriate pace. Excellent description of software development methodologies Excellent discussion of two or more software development methodologies |
|
Above Average/good Outcome: 60-69% |
Most of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Good grasp of theoretical/ conceptual/ practical elements. Good integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. |
Accurately covers the relevant information about software development methodologies. Displays a good understanding of theoretical, conceptual, and practical aspects of software development methodologies. Integrates theory, practice, and information in a satisfactory manner to meet the presentation's objectives. Accurate use of time available to present and answer questions. A very good presentation using MS PowerPoint, very good use of body language and clearly spoken at an appropriate pace. Very good description of software development methodologies Very good discussion of two or more software development methodologies |
|
Average Outcome: 50- 59% |
Some of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Adequate grasp of the theoretical/ conceptual/ practical elements. Fair integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. |
Covers some of the relevant information about software development methodologies with occasional inaccuracies. Demonstrates an adequate grasp of theoretical, conceptual, and practical elements related to software development methodologies. Integration of theory, practice, and information is fair and meets the basic requirements of the presentation's objectives. A fair use of time available to present and answer questions. A good presentation using MS PowerPoint and clearly spoken at an appropriate pace for the majority of the presentation. A good description of the benefits your app will provide. A good description of the issues faced whilst developing your app. |
|
Satisfactory Outcome: 40-49% |
No major omissions or inaccuracies in the deployment of information/skills. Some grasp of theoretical/ conceptual/ practical elements. Integration of theory/practice/information present intermittently in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives. |
Presents information and skills without major omissions or inaccuracies. Shows some grasp of theoretical, conceptual, and practical aspects of software development methodologies. Integration of theory, practice, and information is present intermittently and meets some of the presentation's objectives. A reasonable use of time available to present. A presentation using MS PowerPoint and may be spoken at an irregular pace. A satisfactory description of the benefits your app will provide. A satisfactory description of the issues faced whilst developing your app.
|
|
Unsatisfactory Outcome: 30-39% |
Knowledge and understanding at limited level; may be errors both in terms of factual knowledge and understanding; expression of ideas not always clear, and argument/discussion weakly structured. |
Displays limited knowledge and understanding; may include errors in factual knowledge and understanding. Expression of ideas is not always clear, and the structure of argument/discussion is weak. Limited analysis and understanding of software development methodologies are evident. |
|
Unsatisfactory Outcome: 20 -29% |
Knowledge and understanding at limited level shown by significant errors and/or omissions both in terms of factual knowledge and understanding, with tendency to description rather than analysis; may include inability to express ideas clearly, lack of coherence in terms of structure, inclusion of irrelevant material. |
Demonstrates a limited level of knowledge and understanding, with significant errors and omissions in factual knowledge and understanding. Focuses on description rather than analysis and lacks coherent structure. May include irrelevant material and unclear expression of ideas. |
|
Unsatisfactory Outcome: below 20% |
Overall lack of relevant information, descriptive not analytical; may also be repetitive, lack organisation, demonstrate inadequate use of language and inability to construct sentences. |
Descriptive rather than analytical approach is predominant. Organizational structure is lacking, language use is inadequate, and sentence construction is problematic. Knowledge and understanding at an extremely limited level. There may be significant errors and/or omissions both in factual knowledge and understanding. Practical application may be extremely limited or not present at all. |
Order Custom Answers for CMP112 Assessment 1: Presentation
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you looking for CMP112 Programming Fundamentals Assessment 1 Presentation? Worry no need! Ai–Free Assignment help you score high in the academic year without any hassle. Our experts provide 100% human written and well-structured assignments. Our Programming Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. Hire cheap assignment helpers today and complete your assignment before the deadline. Free assignment samples are also provided to determine the quality and structure of the assignment. Hire professionals now! And stay worry-free!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
