Category | Assignment | Subject | Finance |
---|---|---|---|
University | Massey University (MU) | Module Title | Construction Financial Administration |
Word Count | 2500-3000 Words |
---|---|
Assessment Title | Assignment 1 |
For this question, you are required to critically compare and analyse procurement methods, tendering methods, and contractual arrangements of two actual projects.
Project | Project Name | Location | Project Type |
---|---|---|---|
A | City Rail Link | Auckland, New Zealand | Rail |
B | Wellington Northern Corridor – Peka Peka Interchange | Wellington, New Zealand | Road |
What to do
Report Structure
1. Introduction to the selected cases.
2. Procurement methods
a. Critical analysis of the procurement method comparing the two projects against the theory.
b. Suitability, benefits and drawbacks of the procurement method for the projects. (If you think any other method is suitable, propose the method with justification.)
3. Tendering Methods
a. Critical analysis of the tendering methods, comparing the two projects against the theory.
b. Suitability, benefits, and drawbacks of the tendering methods for the selected cases. (If you think any other method is
suitable, propose the method with justification.)
4. Contractual Arrangements
a. Critical analysis of the contractual arrangements comparing the two projects against the theory.
b. Suitability, benefits and drawbacks of the procurement method for the selected cases. (If you think any other method is suitable, propose the method with justification.)
5. Conclusions and recommendations – comparing the two cases, what are your overall findings and recommendations?
6. References – APA style, American Psychological Association referencing style -Massey University
7. Appendices – sources of information used other than the provided project reports
Submission: Word File (one submission from each group)
Word count: 2500 – 3000
Assume you are a quantity surveyor arrived in New Zealand recently. You are employed as a consultant quantity surveyor for a proposed multi-storey commercial tower project in the Auckland CBD. The client and the consultancy team are currently working on the early design stages, and they want you to select a suitable standard document for the conditions of contract for the project. The project involves both local and international professionals in the project team. The client is in favour of NZS 3910: 2023. Since you have several years of experience overseas, you have strong experience in FIDIC 2017 conditions of contracts. But you have no experience and knowledge of NZS 3910: 2023. Therefore, prepare a report comparing NZS 3910: 2023 and FIDIC 2017 and propose the most suitable document for this project.
Your report must include the following:
Submission: Word File (one submission from each group)
Word count: 2500 – 3000
Refer to the attached case law, SRG Global Remediation Services (NZ) Limited v Body Corporate 197281 [2022] NZCA 518. The dispute was primarily due to payment-related issues.
When this dispute happened, the standard document for the conditions of contract in New Zealand was NZS 3910: 2013. Therefore, review the payment-related matters of the case against NZS 3910: 2013 and the Construction Contracts Act. Provide your conclusions and recommendations on the case, supporting or contrasting the court judgment.
You may only compare the payments and variations related matters using clauses 6, 9 and 12. Clause 13 is not part of this assessment.
Your answer should include the following.
You can make necessary assumptions if required and list them clearly in the report.
Submission: Word File (one submission from each group)
Word count: 2000 – 2500 (excluding references)
Your presentation should include the following:
Your contribution to the group assignment – What tasks were done by you, how the tasks were distributed among the members, and how you communicated with others.
Your reflection – Demonstrate your understanding and reflection of the assignment tasks. What did you learn from this assignment?
Challenges – Did you and your group face any challenges during the assignment? How did you overcome those challenges?
Final remarks, if any.
Submission: MP4 file (length 5 minutes – 10 minutes)
Plagiarism: Plagiarism is a very serious offence. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE.
Late submission: A penalty of 3 marks will be deducted for each calendar day (including weekends and public holidays) or a part of a day an assignment is submitted late after the Stream deadline. Assignments submitted more than 7 calendar days after the Stream deadline may not be marked and may receive a mark of 0.
Extension of time: ONLY the course coordinator may grant an extension, but students must apply in advance. If you need an extension of more than 2 weeks, you should submit an aegrotat/ impaired performance application for consideration. Aegrotat and impaired performance consideration – Massey University
AI Usage: Please refer to the AI policy and guidelines, and use AI within the allowed limits in the policy. You may use AI for planning, structuring, improving the language, correcting grammar and spelling mistakes. But you are not to generate answers or ideas for this report. The submission must be capable of demonstrating the critical thinking of the student.
Submit Your Assignment Questions & Get Plagiarism-Free Answers
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentLooking for expert guidance in Construction Financial Administration? Worry, no need! We are here to help you with assignments. Whether you need finance assignment help or well-structured solutions, we will provide everything. You will get free assignment examples that will make your study material stronger. our expert team are providing all assignment services, you will get accurate, clear, and original content. Now stop worrying about marks and complete your assignments hassle-free with expert support. So what's the delay? Get connected with us now and make your academic journey easy!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content