Category | Assignment | Subject | Marketing |
---|---|---|---|
University | BPP Business School | Module Title | Customer Experience Strategy Coursework 6 |
Word Count | 2500 Words |
---|---|
Assessment Type | Summative Assessment |
Assessment Title | Coursework |
Academic Year | 2024-25 |
You are tasked with writing a 2,500-word report on the customer experience (CX) strategy of a specific product from a company of your choice listed below. The report should focus on analysing the CX strategy as it is implemented in a particular country where the company operates.
You should write your report for the Board of Directors of the company you have chosen from the list below. Within the business report, reference should be made to relevant CX concepts, literature and application as appropriate. Only use tables to answer the requirements where it is suggested to do so. Below is an overview of the global recreation/amusement park industry.
The global amusement parks market is experiencing significant growth, with projections indicating an increase from USD 74.2 billion in 2023 to approximately USD 132.5 billion by 2032, driven by a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 5.5% during this period. The industry is a vibrant and competitive sector, with consistent growth driven by rising disposable incomes, urbanization, and increasing demand for family entertainment. Major players include Disney, Universal Studios, Six Flags, and regional operators- Chimelong (China) and Europa-Park (Germany)., offering a mix of thrilling rides, themed attractions, and immersive experiences. The Asia-Pacific region, particularly China and India, is a key growth market, while North America and Europe remain strongholds. Customer experience is central to the success of amusement parks, as it directly impacts visitor satisfaction, brand loyalty, and revenue. By focusing on seamless, memorable experiences, parks can ensure repeat visits and attract new audiences in an increasingly competitive landscape. As the industry evolves, customer experience remains a cornerstone of its growth and sustainability.
As of 2023, the top four global amusement park operators by revenue are Disney Experiences, Universal Destinations & Experiences, Merlin Entertainments and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. These industry leaders continue to shape the global amusement park landscape through strategic expansions, innovative attractions, and a commitment to enhancing guest/customer experiences. Statista; Disney Annual Report; Stock Analysis; New York Post.
Company |
Product/Service |
Country |
Disney Experiences |
A division of The Walt Disney Company, is the largest global amusement park operator by revenue, generating approximately $33.4 billion in 2023. With iconic destinations like Disneyland Resort, Walt Disney World, and international locations in Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Shanghai, Disney Parks attract millions annually. Known for immersive storytelling and unparalleled guest experiences, the parks feature world- class attractions, entertainment, dining, and themed accommodations. Disney continually innovates, leveraging beloved franchises such as Star Wars, Marvel, and Pixar to create new attractions, enhancing visitor engagement. Technological advancements, including the Genie+ reservation system, optimize guest experiences and reduce wait times. Sustainability is a priority, with initiatives to reduce waste and carbon emissions. Despite economic challenges, Disney Parks remain resilient, cementing their status as a leader in the global amusement park industry (Statista; Disney Annual Report). |
ANY |
Universal Destinations & Experiences |
A subsidiary of Comcast Corporation is a leading global amusement park operator with revenue of approximately $8.95 billion in 2023. The company manages a portfolio of iconic parks, including Universal Studios Hollywood, Universal Orlando Resort, and Universal Studios Japan, offering attractions based on blockbuster franchises like Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, and Minions. Renowned for its cutting-edge technology and immersive experiences, Universal integrates 3D and 4D rides, live-action shows, and detailed theming to captivate audiences. Recent expansions include Super Nintendo World, which has bolstered its global appeal. The company targets diverse markets with tailored offerings, ensuring relevance in key regions such as North America, Asia, and Europe. Universal also leverages robust marketing and partnerships to attract millions of visitors annually. Customer experience is central to its success, with ongoing investments in innovation, mobile technology, and guest services to maintain its competitive edge (Statista). |
ANY |
Merlin Entertainments |
Headquartered in the United Kingdom, is a leading global operator of visitor attractions, including theme parks, aquariums, and branded experiences. Renowned for its LEGOLAND parks, Madame Tussauds wax museums, and SEA LIFE aquariums, Merlin operates over 140 attractions in 25 countries. In 2023, the company reported revenues of approximately $2.3 billion, driven by a focus on family-oriented experiences and innovative partnerships with major franchises like LEGO and Peppa Pig. Merlin continually expands its footprint, with new LEGOLAND parks in emerging markets and enhancements to existing attractions. The |
ANY |
|
company emphasizes customer experience through immersive storytelling, themed environments, and engaging activities, ensuring repeat visitation and high guest satisfaction. Sustainability is also a priority, reflected in eco-friendly initiatives across its parks and attractions. With a balanced portfolio and global reach, Merlin remains a significant player in the competitive recreation and amusement park industry (Blooloop). |
|
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation |
Established in 1961 by Angus G. Wynne Jr., has evolved into a leading amusement park operator in North America. As of 2023, the company managed 27 parks across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, offering a variety of attractions including roller coasters, water parks, and live entertainment. In 2023, Six Flags reported annual revenue of approximately $1.43 billion, reflecting a 4.98% increase from the previous year. On July 1, 2024, Six Flags completed a merger with Cedar Fair, creating the largest amusement park operator in North America, now overseeing 42 parks. The combined entity continues to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "FUN." This strategic merger aims to enhance guest experiences and operational efficiencies across its extensive portfolio (Stock Analysis; Statista; New York Post) |
ANY |
You need to address the following tasks:
Guidelines:
Guidelines:
Guidelines:
Guidelines:
The report must be in a clear font (e.g., Arial/Calibri point size 11) with consistent format styles, automatic page numbers and table of contents. Line spacing should be 1.5. Maximum word count: 2500 (Summative)
Suggested Structure: Your report structure should include the following sections:
Cover page University cover sheet
Title Page
Table of Contents
Introduction 50 words
Report
Conclusion 150 words
References
If you have consulted any source, either printed or online, you must include it in the list of your references and dates of internet access where applicable. For more information on referencing and the Harvard system, access the link given in the General Assessment Guidance above.
Appendix (if appropriate): Appendices contain additional information that would be too detailed to include in the main body. Typical examples of information included in appendices can be glossaries (if it is a technical report), tables with supporting statistical data, examples of research and so on.
NOTE
The word count of (2500 words) only applies to the main body (shown in bold blue); i.e., cover page, table of contents, list of abbreviations, references and appendix are not part of the word count.
All submissions must be written in an academic style (not first person) and any figures, diagrams and independent research must be appropriately referenced using the Harvard Referencing System. If you have any further questions about this coursework assignment, please contact the tutor or the module leader.
Learning Outcomes |
Fail (0-39%) |
Low Fail (40-49%) |
Pass (50-59%) |
Merit (60-69%) |
Distinction (70-79%) |
High Distinction (80- 100%) |
(LO1) |
||||||
LO1: Appraise |
Weak or no |
Limited knowledge of |
Satisfactory |
Good knowledge of |
Excellent Knowledge |
Outstanding |
the importance |
knowledge of CX with |
CX with limited |
knowledge of CX with |
CX with adequate |
of CX with thorough |
Knowledge of CX |
of customer |
weak definition, |
definition, |
some basic |
definition, |
definition, |
with thorough |
experience for |
explanation, and |
explanation, and |
definition, |
explanation, and |
explanation, and |
definition, |
the success of |
importance. Weak or |
importance. Limited |
explanation, and |
importance. Good |
importance clearly |
explanation, and |
the business. |
no evidence of |
evidence of research |
importance. |
evidence of research |
enumerated. Very |
importance clearly |
|
research into your |
into your chosen |
Adequate evidence |
into your chosen |
good evidence of |
enumerated. |
|
chosen company |
company product to |
of research into your |
company product to |
research into your |
Outstanding |
|
product to establish |
establish |
chosen company |
establish |
chosen company |
evidence of research |
|
implementation of |
implementation of |
product to establish |
implementation of |
product to establish |
into your chosen |
|
CX strategies and its |
CX strategies and its |
implementation of CX |
CX strategies and its |
implementation of |
company product to |
|
impact to deliver |
impact to deliver |
strategies and its |
impact to deliver |
CX strategies and its |
establish |
|
competitive |
competitive |
impact to deliver |
competitive |
impact to deliver |
implementation of |
|
advantage. |
advantage. |
competitive |
advantage. |
competitive |
CX strategies and its |
|
|
|
advantage. |
|
advantage. |
impact to deliver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
competitive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
advantage. |
(LO2) |
||||||
LO2: Design |
Weak or no visual |
Limited visual |
Satisfactory visual |
Good visual |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
and implement |
presentation of |
presentation of |
presentation of |
presentation of |
professional-looking |
professional-looking |
a customer |
Consumer Persona |
Consumer Persona |
Consumer Persona |
Consumer Persona |
visual presentation |
visual presentation |
journey |
and Customer |
and Customer |
and Customer |
and Customer |
of Consumer Persona |
of Consumer Persona |
mapping |
Journey Map. Lacks |
Journey Map. Lacks |
Journey Map with |
Journey Map with |
and Customer |
and Customer |
process, |
relevance to the |
relevance to the |
adequate relevance |
good relevance to |
Journey Map with |
Journey Map with |
persona |
chosen company |
chosen company |
to the chosen |
the chosen company |
very good relevance |
outstanding |
creation and |
product. Weak or no |
product. Limited |
company product. |
product. Good |
to the chosen |
relevance to the |
measurement metrics |
definition, explanation, role and purpose in developing CX strategy identified. |
definition, explanation, role and purpose in developing CX strategy identified. |
Satisfactory definition, explanation, role and purpose in developing CX strategy identified. |
definition, explanation, role and purpose in developing CX strategy identified. |
company product. Excellent definition, explanation, role and purpose in developing CX strategy identified. |
chosen company product. Flawless and brilliant definition, explanation, role and purpose in developing CX strategy identified. |
(LO3) |
||||||
LO3: Evaluate |
Weak or no |
Limited knowledge |
Satisfactory |
Good knowledge and |
Excellent knowledge |
Outstanding |
and propose |
knowledge and |
and explanation of |
knowledge and |
explanation of CX |
and explanation of |
knowledge and |
organisational |
explanation of CX |
CX performance |
explanation of CX |
performance metrics |
CX performance |
explanation of CX |
CX |
performance metrics |
metrics with limited |
performance metrics |
with good |
metrics with |
performance metrics |
performance |
with weak or no |
application to your |
with basic application |
application to your |
impressive |
with outstanding |
metrics |
application to your |
chosen company |
to your chosen |
chosen company |
application to your |
application to your |
|
chosen company |
product. Basic |
company product. |
product. Good |
chosen company |
chosen company |
|
product. Inadequate |
evaluation of |
Adequate evaluation |
evaluation of |
product. Excellent |
product. Impeccable |
|
evaluation of |
effectiveness and |
of effectiveness and |
effectiveness and |
evaluation of |
evaluation of |
|
effectiveness and |
improvements. |
improvements. |
improvements. |
effectiveness and |
effectiveness and |
|
improvements. |
|
|
|
improvements. |
improvements. |
(LO4) |
||||||
LO4: Evaluate |
Weak or no |
Limited knowledge of |
Satisfactory |
Good knowledge of |
Excellent knowledge |
Outstanding |
how |
knowledge of the |
the role of |
knowledge of the |
the role of |
of the role of |
knowledge of the |
organisations |
role of interaction |
interaction and |
role of interaction |
interaction and |
interaction and |
role of interaction |
ensure a |
and customization to |
customization to |
and customization to |
customization to |
customization to |
and customization to |
seamless omni- |
improve and enhance |
improve and |
improve and enhance |
improve and |
improve and |
improve and |
channel |
seamless omni- |
enhance seamless |
seamless omni- |
enhance seamless |
enhance seamless |
enhance seamless |
customer |
channel marketing. |
omni-channel |
channel marketing. |
omni-channel |
omni-channel |
omni-channel |
journey |
No evidence of |
marketing. |
Adequate evidence |
marketing. |
marketing. Very |
marketing. |
|
extensive research |
Inadequate evidence |
of extensive research |
Significant evidence |
Good evidence of |
Outstanding |
|
into chosen company |
of extensive research |
into chosen company |
of extensive research |
extensive research |
evidence of |
|
and justification is lacking. |
into chosen company and weak justification |
and basic justification. |
into chosen company and adequate justification. |
into chosen company and impressive justification. |
extensive research into chosen company and impressive justification. |
(LO5) |
||||||
|
Weak or no knowledge of Customer Centricity concept with weak explanation of its importance to business success. Weak or no evidence of research into your chosen company product to establish implementation of CX processes. Weak or no discussion of CX critical success factors and its impact to deliver competitive advantage. |
Limited knowledge of Customer Centricity concept with limited explanation of its importance to business success. Limited evidence of research into your chosen company product to establish implementation of CX processes. Limited discussion of CX critical success factors and its impact to deliver competitive advantage. |
Satisfactory knowledge of Customer Centricity concept with basic explanation of its importance to business success. Satisfactory evidence of research into your chosen company product to establish implementation of CX processes. Satisfactory discussion of CX critical success factors and its impact to deliver competitive advantage. |
Good knowledge of Customer Centricity concept with good explanation of its importance to business success. Good evidence of research into your chosen company product to establish implementation of CX processes. Good discussion of CX critical success factors and its impact to deliver competitive advantage. |
Excellent knowledge of Customer Centricity concept with very good explanation of its importance to business success. Excellent evidence of research into your chosen company product to establish implementation of CX processes. Excellent discussion of CX critical success factors and its impact to deliver competitive advantage. |
Outstanding knowledge of Customer Centricity concept with impressive explanation of its importance to business success. Brilliant and flawless evidence of research into your chosen company product to establish implementation of CX processes. Outstanding discussion of CX critical success factors and its impact to deliver competitive advantage. |
Research Skills |
Inadequate or weak academic/ intellectual skills with some difficulties. |
Limited academic/intellectual skills. Original work with personal |
Satisfactory academic/intellectual skills. Wholly original work with good |
Good academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates good intellectual |
Excellent academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates very good |
Outstanding academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates outstanding |
|
Largely imitative and descriptive. Some difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression but developing practical/professional skills. |
reflection and broad evidence-based critique. Solid structure and accuracy in expression. Practical/professional skills evident. |
reflection and well- reasoned judgements forming from evidence-based critique. Consistent structure and accuracy in expression. Practical/professional skills established. |
originality and imagination |
intellectual originality, integrity, coherence and imagination. |
intellectual originality, integrity, coherence and imagination. |
Referencing Skills |
Inadequate or weak references but may contain inconsistencies, errors or omissions. |
Limited and full and appropriate references with minor or insignificant errors |
Satisfactory with precise, full and appropriate references. |
Good with precise, full and appropriate references at a high standard. |
Excellent with precise, full and appropriate references at near- publishing standard. |
Outstanding with precise, full and appropriate references at publishing standard. |
Get the Solution of this CES Assessment
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentDon’t let your Customer Experience Strategy Coursework 6 assignment stress you out! We are here for marketing assignment help. Our expert writers are here to support you with affordable, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignment help. Whether it’s Business Management or a complex project, we ensure well-researched, high-quality content. We offer free assignment samples and always deliver your work before the deadline. Reach out today and get the best support for your assignments—quick, easy, and reliable! We also provide BPP Business School Assignment Samples that the phd expert writers have written. Contact us now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content