| Category | Assignment | Subject | Entrepreneurship |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Greenwich | Module Title | BUSI1692 International Entrepreneurship |
| Assessment Title | Assessment 2 |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |
|
First sit assessments |
Deadline or exam period |
Weighting out of 100%* |
Maximum length |
Marking type |
Learning outcomes mapped to this assessment. |
|
Assessment 1 |
26th November |
30% |
15 minutes |
Stepped |
1,2,3,4,5,6 |
|
Group Presentation/ Report |
2025 05.00pm |
Presentation |
Presentation + 10 min Q&A |
|
|
|
Assessment 2 Individual Report |
08th December 2025 05.00pm |
70% |
2,500 words (excluding references) |
Stepped |
1,2,3,4,5,6 |
Create/develop your own start-up or choose an existing SME/family firm (please note that the family firm should be small; do not select large multinationals). Whatever you choose, it must not be the same business idea you presented in your group.
You will also have to refer to relevant theories and concepts in your individual reports. Do not forget to cite your sources in your report! Use reliable sources only! You must also have a reference list! Check the materials on how to reference properly (Harvard format).
Please use graphs and tables. This will make your individual reports more appealing.
|
Criteria |
80-100% (Exceptional) |
70-79% (Excellent) |
60-69% (Very Good) |
50-59% (Good) |
40-49% (Fail) |
30-39% (Fail) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Business Idea (25%) |
Approaches business idea which perfectly links the topic and maintains focus throughout. |
The business idea is very clearly made linked to the topic and resources. |
The business idea is particular. The person responsible somewhat addresses the demands of the task. |
The business idea is vague, unclear, or missing. The person does not focus on or address the demands of the task. |
The business idea is vague, unclear, or missing. The person does not focus on or address the demands of the task. |
No resources attempt to define the business idea. Very poor mention of the business idea. |
|
Evidence (25%) |
All the appropriate data and evidence are presented to support the business idea and are reliable and sourced clearly. |
Most of the appropriate data and evidence are presented for the business idea although this may be inadequate or contain some inaccuracies. |
Some appropriate data and evidence are presented for the business idea although this may contain quite a few inaccuracies. |
Some general evidence is provided in support of the business idea. |
Some evidence is general, inappropriate or inadequate support of the business idea. |
The evidence is almost absent and does not cover the business idea. |
|
Reasoning (25%) |
Excellent reasoning demonstrates deep understanding of the business idea and sources. The response clearly addresses the task and explains how the idea will be successful. |
Very good reasoning demonstrates sound understanding of the business idea and sources, and explains the relationship between the idea and its success. |
The response demonstrates reasoning and understanding of the business idea and sources but explanation is weak. |
The response demonstrates some reasoning and understanding of the business idea and sources, but explanation is minimal. |
The response demonstrates no reasoning or understanding of the business idea and sources, and explanation is weak. |
Very poor reasoning with no attempt to explain how the business idea would become successful. |
| Organisation (15%) | An effective organizational structure with clear understanding and logical sequence.of the business idea.The relationshipsbetween ideas aremade perfectlyclearwith effectivetransitional phrases. | Organizational structure is evident but somewhat lacking in development. | Organizational structure is presented but not fully developed. | An organizational structure is attempted but not fully developed. | Organizational structure is almost absent, with | |
| Language (10%) Communicate ideas clearly using vocabulary specific to the scientific topic |
Ideas are presented ina very concise way,using vocabularyspecific to the businessidea. If efforts in conventions arepresent, they do notinterfere with meaning. | Ideas are veryclear,using vocabularyspecific to the businessidea. Very fewerrors inconventions are present that mayinterfere with meaning. | Ideas are clear, using mostly vocabularyspecific to the business idea. Fewerrors inconventions are present that mayinterfere with meaning. | Ideas are clear, usingsome vocabularyspecific to the businessidea. Some errors inconventions interfere with meaning. | Ideas are not at some parts partlyclear and the vocabularytothebusiness idea is poor.Many errors that donot allow the reader to fullyunderstand thebusiness idea. | Ideas are notatsomeparts partly clear andthe vocabulary to thebusiness idea is poor.Many errors that do not allow the reader to fullyunderstand thebusiness idea. |
Note: This rubric is designed for the individual report assessment 2. Evaluators will consider your ability to independently analyse and present a comprehensive international enterprise strategy.
The marking rubrics provide a detailed breakdown of marking criteria for the Individual and Group reports. Please, read it carefully to understand what is expected of you.
Coursework is marked on the understanding that it is the student’s own work on the module and that it has not, in whole or part, been presented elsewhere for assessment. Where material has been used from other sources, this must be properly acknowledged in accordance with the University’s regulations regarding Assessment Misconduct.
To pass this module, you must achieve an overall mark of 50+ and a mark of 50+ for all assessments.
For coursework, the marks and feedback will normally be provided to students within fifteen working days of the submission deadline. In exceptional circumstances, where there is a delay in providing feedback, you will be informed by the module leader.
If you do not pass a module on the first attempt, you will likely be eligible for a resit opportunity on the failed assessments. The Progression and Award Board (PAB) will decide whether you will be offered an opportunity to resit. Note that marks on resit assessments are capped at 50% unless an extenuation has been applied for and granted.
Submit Your BUSI1692 Assignment Questions & Get Plagiarism Free Answers
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentAre you having trouble completing your BUSI1692 International Entrepreneurship? Our Entrepreneurship Assignment Help service is the best for you. You can even check our free assignment samples before placing your order. We promise on-time delivery and 24/7 support, no matter your academic needs. From Business Management to technical subjects, we cover it all. We also provide University of Greenwich Assignment Samples that the phd expert writers have written. Contact us now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content