Category | Assignment | Subject | Computer Science |
---|---|---|---|
University | Murdoch University | Module Title | BRG-ISEA: Introduction to Server Environments and Architectures Reflective Learning Journal |
Word Count | 1500-3000 Words |
---|
Weighting: 100% – Due Date: Please refer to LMS Gradebook
Word Count: 1500–3000 words (excluding appendix)
Reflective Journal in Word docx file, with screenshots/scripts/configs
GitHub Repo – Public Link
GitHub clearly documented all lab activities to demonstrate the process, screenshots, and outcomes.
GitHub Repo – completed pages saved as PDF file(s)
15-minute self-narrated Video Demo of labs completed – downloadable MP4 file web link. Include this table on the cover page:
Student Name: | |
Student ID: | |
Additional Server Service: | |
GitHub Repository Link: | |
Video URL Link / uploaded filename: | CTID-YourName-AssignmentISEA.MP4 |
GitHub pages saved as PDF | CTID-YourName-AssignmentISEA-GITnn.PDF |
Word DOCX file uploaded on LMS: | CTID-YourName-AssignmentISEA.DOCX |
This journal reflects on a series of structured lab tasks completed throughout the BRG-ISEA unit, focusing on the real-world application of server environment concepts in both Linux and cloud systems. Each lab involved practical, hands-on experience with system operations, automation scripting, cloud provisioning, cost modelling, DNS configuration, and security hardening. The learning journey culminated with a recorded video demonstration, allowing for both technical execution and reflective analysis of decisions, challenges, best practices, and lessons learned.
Reflect on all activities completed across the 4-day intensive mode. These include Linux setup, cloud deployment, scripting, permissions, DNS configuration, SSL certificates, a consulting session, and one self-selected additional server service.
You must reflect on the full range of activities across the 4-day intensive schedule, including:
(Based on: Obtaining a Linux Environment Lab)
(Based on: Ubuntu Desktop Familiarisation Lab)
(Based on: Linux Services Lab)
(Based on: Searching File Systems Lab)
(Based on: TCO Analysis Lab for AWS vs Azure)
(Based on: Amazon EC2 Web Services Lab)
(Based on: Bash Coding Lab)
(Based on: DNS Configuration Lab)
(Based on: SSL Certificate Lab)
(Based on: Scripting Linux Server Functions Lab)
You may use AI tools for:
You may NOT use AI to:
Include a section titled “AI Tools Used (if any)” at the end of your journal.
All work must be your own. Any detected academic dishonesty (plagiarism, undeclared AI use, ghost-writing) will be reported and penalized.
MU BRG-ISEA: Introduction to Server Environments and Architectures
Criteria | Excellent (High Distinction) | Very Good (Distinction) | Good (Credit) | Satisfactory (Pass) | Unsatisfactory (Fail) |
Coverage of all unit activities 20% | Comprehensively covers all required activities with depth and personalisation. | Covers most activities with good detail and minimal gaps. | Covers key activities adequately, but some are briefly addressed. | Superficially addresses activities with limited depth. | Many activities are missing or inadequately addressed. |
17-20 | 13-16 | 9-12 | 5-8 | 0-4 | |
Depth of technical understanding 20% | Demonstrates excellent grasp of concepts, applies them accurately. | Good understanding shown with minor gaps or inaccuracies. | Moderate grasp with some correct application and minor misunderstandings. | Basic understanding is evident, but with notable misconceptions. | Lacks understanding;
numerous technical inaccuracies. |
17-20 | 13-16 | 9-12 | 5-8 | 0-4 | |
Reflective insight and problem-solving 25% | Highly insightful reflection; excellent analysis of problems and solutions. | Clear reflection with relevant problem-solving approaches discussed. | General reflection with some mention of decisions and issues faced. | Limited reflection and shallow problem-solving discussion. | Minimal
reflection; lacks analysis or depth. |
21-25 | 16-20 | 11-15 | 6-10 | 0-5 | |
Quality and structure of writing 10% | Fluent, well-organized, error-free; strong professional tone. | Well-structured with minor language or format issues. | Generally clear; some inconsistencies in grammar or structure. | Difficult to follow; numerous language issues. | Poorly written and structured; unclear or disorganised. |
9-10 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 3-4 | 0-2 | |
Video presentation quality & demonstration 15% | Clear, engaging, thorough walkthrough; voice and visuals well aligned. | Informative and mostly clear; slight lack in polish or clarity. | Meets basic expectations with minor technical or pacing issues. | Disorganised or lacks clarity; key tasks poorly demonstrated. | Incomplete or poorly delivered; minimal effort shown. |
13-15 | 10-12 | 7-9 | 4-6 | 0-3 | |
Use of GitHub and technical documentation 10% | Excellent use of GitHub; well-organized repo with meaningful commits. | Good GitHub use; repo is mostly clear and complete. | Basic documentation included; minor issues in organisation. | Minimal GitHub usage or poor documentation structure. | No meaningful use of GitHub or documentation absent. |
9-10 | 7-8 | 5-6 |
Create a GitHub account and start documenting progress.
Lab: Obtaining Linux on your PC – Install Ubuntu using VirtualBox.
Lab: Familiarity with Ubuntu Linux – Basic command line navigation and utilities.
Lab: Linux Services – Understanding and managing background services.
Lab: Linux Permissions – Explore and apply file and directory permissions.
Lab: Searching Filesystems – Use commands like `find` and `grep`.
Session 2a: Total Cost of Ownership
Lab: Total Cost of Ownership – Apply TCO concepts in a practical comparison.
Lab: Cloud Computing – Launch and configure EC2 instance or Azure VM.
Lab: Bash Scripting – Write simple shell scripts for server automation.
Lab: DNS – Configure and test DNS using BIND or cloud provider.
Lab: Digital Certificates – Use Let’s Encrypt to secure a server.
Lab: Scripting Linux Server Functions – Automate server tasks using scripts.
Participated in a Q&A session with the teaching staff
Experiment with another server service of interest (in discussion with the lecturer). Installed, configured, and tested an additional service of your choice.
Lab activity documentation and peer feedback.
Reflection on lab consultancy, peer demonstrations, and self-assessment
Achieve Higher Grades with BRG-ISEA Assignment Solutions
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentNeed last-minute help with your BRG-ISEA: Introduction to Server Environments and Architectures Reflective Learning Journal Assignment? We are here for computer science assignment help! From Business Management to technical subjects, we’ve got you covered. Explore our free assignment samples and experience the quality for yourself. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress! We also provide Murdoch University Assignment Samples that have been written by the phd expert writers. Contact us now!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content