| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University Of Greater Manchester | Module Title | BMP 6026 International HRM |

Module Tutor: U M Chrishanthi Ranaweera
Module Tutor Email: chrishanthi@wincedu.uk
Other Contact Methods: Scheduled drop-in hours available for support – During online sessions and via email
Availability: Please allow 48 hours for any response via email.
Weblink to Moodle Class
Class Zoom Link Online class link is as below: Join Zoom Meeting
The Module Tutor’s contact details are provided above. In addition to your personal email, you should check your University of Greater Manchester email address and the Moodle area dedicated to this module regularly as many module communications are channelled through these routes.
Your Module Tutor will normally aim to respond to your email messages within 2 full working days of receipt.
This module aims to provide you with an opportunity to focus your studies on the people dimension of international business and management. In the competitive global arena of the 21st century, people are seen as key to the success of the organisation in achieving competitive advantage. As such, the role of International Human Resource Management has become increasingly important. Organisations, wherever they are based, need to ensure that they have the right people, in the right place at the right time. This module will enhance your understanding of the international context of Human Resource Management (HRM), specifically the importance of International HRM practices and factors which impact on this.
Taught (T), Developed (D) and Assessed (A). This is for cohort 18 & 19 and it’s important to pay attention to two summative assessments each carrying 50% of the weightages.
The first component consists of a Case Study approach for a selected organisation (MNCs) which should be pre-approved by the tutor. The second component is about critical analysis of practices at multiple MNCs for a wider application and conceptual reach-out. [COHERENCE]
This is a recently revised version which has gone through Programme review; hence changes have been applied to ensure it is up to date. Learners have a choice of a selecting organisations they are interested to examine for concept application. Both assignments require critical thinking skills for a comprehensive analysis of issues rather than a simple or descriptive conceptual understanding [CONTEMPORARY, CHOICE, CHALLENGE, & CONSOLIDATION].
This module is delivered via online live sessions and asynchronous practical activities. Live sessions will include lectures, break-out room discussions, workshops and tutorials. All lectures will be recorded to allow students to check/refresh learning. Any asynchronous practical activities should be completed by time specified.
As well as completing the asynchronous practical activities in your own time, you are also expected to carry out independent study including research and assessment activities.
In weeks 3, 4, 6,7 and 8 tutorials will take place which will provide you with the opportunity to discuss your progress on the module and receive feedback on formative assessments.
When attending live sessions online, you are expected to:
You are expected to attend at least 80% of live sessions and engage with the module fully. If you are unable to attend a scheduled session or engage with a set activity due to factors outside your control, you should inform your tutor and email info@wincedu.uk.
Please note that attendance and engagement is taken into account when making Assessment Board decisions.
|
Module Learning Outcomes |
Assessment No and Type |
|
LO1: Critically appraise the impact of culture on managerial decision making in relation to Human Resource Management |
Assessment 1: 2500 Word Case Study Report |
|
LO2: Evaluate the management of people as a business resource integral to international organisational strategies. |
|
|
LO3: Critically analyse the importance of international human resource management practices. |
Assessment 2: Practical Presentation / Oral Assessment |
|
LO4: Synthesise key issues surrounding the management of human resources within a global context. |
|
Assessment item |
Due Date |
Weight |
||
|
1 |
Formative: Draft report on case study report on application of International HRM Practices for 2500 words Summative: Final case study report on application of International HRM Practices for 2500 words |
30/11/2025 10/12/2025 |
50% |
|
|
2 |
Formative: Draft Presentation on the critical analysis of the importance of HRM practices Summative: 20-minute oral presentation on the critical analysis of the importance of HRM practices |
09/12/2025 19/12/2025 |
50% |
|
Formative assessment is employed to support your learning on the module, allowing you to reflect on feedback on your progress from your tutors and peers. As well as the formal formative assessment outputs set out in Section 7, formative assessment includes asynchronous practical activities and workshop activities in the live sessions. Formative assessment does not directly contribute to the final module mark.
Feedback on summative items of assessment can be formal (such as on a signed feedback form) or informal (such as advice from a tutor in a tutorial). Feedback is therefore not just your grade or the comments written on your feedback form, it is advice you get from your tutor and sometimes your peers about how your work is progressing, how well you have done, what further actions you might take.
We recognise the value of prompt feedback on work submitted. Other than in exceptional circumstances (such as might be caused by staff illness), you can expect your work to received provisional marks and feedback no more than 15 working days from the deadline date. However, please note that marks are not agreed until the Assessment Board has met and may therefore be subject to change.
Please take time to read or listen to your assessment feedback. This can be very useful in determining your strengths and key areas for development and can therefore help you improve on future grades.
Are You Looking The Solution of BMP 6026 International HRM Assignment ?
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentLive sessions will take place on a Saturday from 1.00-3.00 pm UK time. Tutorials may be conducted outside this time subject to prearranged appointment.
|
Session No. |
Date or Week Commencing |
Topics Covered |
|
1 |
04/10/25 |
Introduction to the Module, VLE and Assessments Overview of IHRM |
|
2 |
11/10/25 |
The difference between Human Resource Management (HRM) and International HRM (IHRM) |
|
3 |
18/10/25 |
HRM and contemporary Issues (1) Transnational and Multinational companies |
|
4 |
25/10/25 |
International HRM Practice Assessment One Briefing |
|
5 |
01/11/25 |
Recruitment and Selection Organisational Culture |
|
6 |
08/11/25 |
Cultural issues in context including high and low context cultures Equality and Diversity |
|
7 |
15/11/25 |
Assignment Two Briefing Performance Management |
|
8 |
22/11/25 |
HRM and contemporary Issues (2) Assignment One Tutorial and Feedback Reviews |
|
9 |
29/11/25 |
HRM and contemporary Issues (3) |
|
10 |
06/12/25 |
Organisational approaches and strategies in HRM Ethical HRM |
|
|
30/11/25 |
Assignment One Draft Submission Deadline |
|
|
09/12/25 |
Assignment Two Draft Submission Deadline |
|
|
10/12/25 |
Assignment One Final Submission |
|
|
19/12/25 |
Assignment Two Final Submission |
|
|
20/12/25 |
Oral Presentations-Assignment Two |
1.Written assessments should be word-processed in Arial or Calibri Light font size 12. Each page should be numbered.
2.There should be a title page identifying the programme name, module title, assessment title, your student number, your marking tutor and the date of submission.
3.You should include a word-count on the assignment cover page (excluding reference list/bibliography, figures, tables and appendices).
Where a word limit is specified, the following penalty systems applies:
4. At the end of the assessment you should include a declaration of any software tools including Generative AI (GAI) applications that you used in developing and completing the assessment. The assessment brief will specify if and how you can use GAI applications in the assessment.
5.All written work should be referenced using the standard University of Bolton referencing style– see: https://libguides.bolton.ac.uk/resources/referencing/
6.Unless otherwise notified by your Module Tutor, electronic copies of assignments should be saved as word documents and uploaded into Turnitin via the Moodle class area. If you experience problems in uploading your work, then you must send an electronic copy of your assessment to your Module Tutor via email BEFORE the due date/time.
7.Please note that when you submit your work to Moodle, it will automatically be checked for matches against other electronic information, as well as for hidden text characters and GAI generated text. You will be able to see similarity matches but not currently flags for hidden characters and AI-generated text. The outcomes of Turnitin reports may be used as evidence in an academic misconduct investigation (see Section 15).
Late work will be subject to the following penalties:
In the case of exceptional and unforeseen circumstances, an extension of up to 14 days after the assessment deadline may be requested using the standard University Extension Request Form. For approval there would need to be an explanation and evidence of relevant circumstances. Longer extensions for individual assessments and projects at the discretion of the Programme Leader.
Requests for extensions which take a submission date past the end of the module must be made using the Special Circumstances procedure
Some students with registered disabilities will be eligible for revised submission deadlines. Revised submission deadlines for disability adjustments do not require the completion extension request paperwork. However, students should request these in writing in advance.
Please note that the failure of data storage systems is not considered to be a valid reason for an extension. It is therefore important that you keep multiple copies of your work on different storage devices before submitting it.
For the second assignment which is an oral presentation, respective presentation schedules will be confirmed in class. However the submission deadline date is indicated on the assessment deadline.
You are required to submit a 20 Minute PowerPoint Presentation to support your verbal presentation for your oral assessment.
|
Assessment Number |
1 |
|
Assessment Type (and weighting) |
Case Study Report (50%) – 2500 words |
|
Assessment Name |
Application of International HRM Practices |
|
Assessment Submission Date |
10/12 /2025 |
LO1: Critically appraise the impact of culture on managerial decision making in relation to Human Resource Management
LO2: Evaluate the management of people as a business resource integral to international organisational strategies.
Assignment Task 1 – Case Study Report (50%) – 2500 words
While it is a known fact that Human Resource Management issues are more diverse in the global environment, it is also established that understanding international human resources is becoming increasingly eminent in the making or breaking of global business.
The first assessment will be a case-study report (50%) in which you will examine a topical HR issue for a real-life organisation. In your report, you should choose an organisation (either multinational or transnational – seek tutor’s approval) and critically appraise the impact of national culture on their managerial decisions in relation to human resource management (discuss how IHRM decisions and operations are affected by cultural practices – Use examples from different operational locations to assess the impact of national cultures, a minimum of two countries wherever your chosen organisation is operating). Also include an evaluation of the chosen companies’ international strategies with regards to management of people as a business resource.
You should submit your work in the form of a report of 2500 words through Turnitin (via Moodle). You are required to include a reference list and to reference your work according to the Harvard convention. Your REPORT should include examples from literature to illustrate your work.
|
AI Status |
Application |
Notes |
|
Category A |
No GAI tool is permitted. |
While grammar and/or spell checkers may be used to correct individual words and sentences, the use of GAI is not allowed. This is because the learning outcomes require you to produce original assessment work without any GAI assistance Any GAI generated content which is presented as your own original work and is not acknowledged will be assessed for academic misconduct. |
Level HE6 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three refereed academic journals and five academic books.
Excellent (70% and above):
There is excellent conceptual understanding supported by a comprehensive discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is fluent, concise and extremely well written, with accurate citing and referencing displayed revealing an excellent standard of the research and study skills required. There are very effective integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. This is supported by thoughtful and incisive reflection and comprehensive evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced.
Very Good (60-69%):
The work demonstrates a very good understanding supported by a wide discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is fluent and well written, with accurate citing and referencing displayed revealing an acceptable standard of the research and study skills required. There are clear integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. This is supported by thoughtful reflection and evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced
Good (50-59%):
There is broader understanding supported by good discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is fairly fluent, with appropriate citing and referencing displayed revealing an acceptable standard of the research and study skills required. There is integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. This is supported by elementary reflection and evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced.
Satisfactory (40-49%)
The work demonstrates a basic understanding supported by only a limited discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is coherent, although there are some omissions in the text in terms of the citing and referencing used revealing a rudimentary grasp of the research and study skills required. There is limited if any integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. There is poor reflection and evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced.
Fail (39% and below):
There are deficiencies or omissions in the level of discussion and scope of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. There is incomplete presentation, inaccurate citing and referencing showing limited research and study skills. The written style lacks fluency and comprehension. There is a poor grasp of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models. The work shows little or no analysis of the key issues, concepts and frameworks relating to International HRM. There is poor integration of these areas in relation to the question set. Fail: Students who do not meet the requirements of a third-class grade will not successfully complete the assessment activity.
|
Assessment Number |
2 |
|
Assessment Type (and weighting) |
Oral Presentation (50%) |
|
Assessment Name |
Critical Analysis of the Importance of HRM Practices |
|
Assessment Submission Date |
19/12/2025 |
LO3: Critically analyse the importance of international human resource management practices.
LO4: Synthesise key issues surrounding the management of human resources within a global context.
Assignment Task 2 – Presentation (50% of Total Marks)
The second assessment will be a presentation (50%) in which you identify and justify critical international human resource management issues.
Prepare a 20-minute presentation on the critical analysis of the importance of HRM practices to manage people in the organisation. Focus on the key issues with regards to managing people within a global context, using good examples from different MNCs.
The presentation will be followed by question-and-answer session based on the findings.
Level HE6 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three refereed academic journals and five academic books.
(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see section 16)
Excellent (70% and above):
The presentation provides an excellent set of very well-designed slides, with excellent content. There is excellent conceptual understanding supported by a comprehensive discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is fluent, concise and extremely well written, with accurate citing and referencing displayed revealing an acceptable standard of the research and study skills required. There is very effective integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. This is supported by thoughtful and incisive reflection and comprehensive evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced.
Very Good (60-69%):
The presentation provides a very good set of well-designed slides, with good content. The work demonstrates a very good understanding supported by a wide discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is fluent and well written, with accurate citing and referencing displayed revealing an acceptable standard of the research and study skills required. There is clear integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. This is supported by thoughtful reflection and evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced.
Good (50-59%):
The presentation provides a fair set of reasonable slides, with acceptable content. There is broader understanding supported by good discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is fairly fluent, with appropriate citing and referencing displayed revealing an acceptable standard of the research and study skills required. There is integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. This is supported by elementary reflection and evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced.
Satisfactory (40-49%)
The presentation provides a marginally acceptable set of slides, with some content. The work demonstrates a basic understanding supported by only a limited discussion of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. The presentation is coherent, although there are some omissions in the text in terms of the citing and referencing used revealing a rudimentary grasp of the research and study skills required. There is limited if any integration and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models relating to International HRM. There is poor reflection and evaluation of the key issues and themes introduced.
Fail (39% and below):
The presentation provides a very weak set of slides with irrelevant content. There are deficiencies or omissions in the level of discussion and scope of the literature relating to the study of International HRM. There is incomplete presentation, inaccurate citing and referencing showing limited research and study skills. The written style lacks fluency and comprehension. There is a poor grasp of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models. The work shows little or no analysis of the key issues, concepts and frameworks relating to International HRM. There is poor integration of these areas in relation to the question set.
Fail: Students who do not meet the requirements of a third-class grade will not successfully complete the assessment activity.
Level HE6 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three refereed academic journals and five academic books.
|
|
Relevance Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass |
Knowledge and Understanding |
Analysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving |
Self-awareness and Reflection |
Research/ Referencing |
Written English |
Presentation and Structure
|
|
Class I 85% - 100% |
Work is directly relevant and expertly addresses the requirements of the brief. Learning outcomes are met. |
Demonstrates an exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice beyond the threshold expectation for the level. Demonstrates mastery in conceptual understanding of a range of specialised areas. |
Presents an exceptional synthesis and critical evaluation of findings from a broad range of relevant sources in order to draw clear, systematic, justified and insightful conclusions. Provides a sophisticated critical insight and expertly interprets complex matters and ideas. Demonstrates exceptional creative flair and a high level of originality. Demonstrates exceptional problem- solving skills and initiative. |
Provides insightful reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. |
An extensive range of contemporary and relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon. Sources cited accurately in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography. |
Writing style is clear, succinct and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. An exceptionally well written answer with competent spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used. A wide range of appropriate vocabulary is used. |
The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment. Evidence of planning and logically structured. Where relevant, there is effective inclusion of, and reference to, figures, tables and images. |
|
Class I 70% - 84% |
Work is relevant and comprehensively addresses the requirements of the brief. Learning outcomes are met. |
Demonstrates an excellent breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates an in-depth conceptual understanding of a range of specialised areas. |
Presents an excellent synthesis and critical evaluation of findings from a broad range of relevant sources in order to draw clear, systematic, justified and perceptive conclusions. Provides a critical insight and clearly interprets complex matters and ideas. Demonstrates excellent problem- solving skills and initiative. |
Provides excellent reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. |
A wide range of contemporary and relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon. Sources cited accurately in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography. |
Writing style is clear, succinct and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. An excellently well written answer with competent, spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used. A wide range of appropriate vocabulary is used. |
The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment. Evidence of planning and logically structured Where relevant, there is effective inclusion of, and reference to, figures, tables and images. |
|
Class II/i 60% - 69% |
Work is relevant and addresses most of the requirements of the brief well. Learning outcomes are met. |
Demonstrates a thorough breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates a sophisticated conceptual understanding of a range of specialised areas. |
Presents a perceptive synthesis and critical evaluation of findings from a range of relevant sources in order to draw clear, justified and thoughtful conclusions. Interprets complex matters and ideas well. Demonstrates strong problem- solving skills. |
Provides very good reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. |
A wide range of relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon. Sources cited accurately in the main in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography. |
Writing style is clear, succinct and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. A very well written answer with competent spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used. A range of appropriate vocabulary is used. |
The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment. Evidence of planning and logically structured in the main. Where relevant, there is effective inclusion of, and reference to, figures, tables and images. |
|
|
Relevance Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass |
Knowledge and Understanding |
Analysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving |
Self-awareness and Reflection |
Research/ Referencing |
Written English |
Presentation and Structure
|
|
Class II/ii 50% - 59% |
Work addresses key requirements of the brief. Some irrelevant content. Learning outcomes are met. |
Demonstrates a sound breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates a sound conceptual understanding of specialised areas. |
Presents a logical evaluation of findings from a range of relevant sources in order to draw clear and justified conclusions. Interprets some complex matters and ideas. Demonstrates effective problem-solving skills and initiative. |
Provides good reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. |
A range of relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon. Most sources accurately cited both the body of text and in the Reference List/Bibliography. |
Writing style is mostly appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are generally competent and minor lapses do not pose difficulty for the reader. Paragraphs are structured and include some linking and signposting. Sentences are complete. A range of appropriate vocabulary is used. |
The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment. Logically structured in the most part. Inclusion of figures, tables and images but not all relevant or referred to. |
|
Class III 40% - 49% |
Work addresses the requirements of the brief, although superficially in places. Some irrelevant content. Learning outcomes are met. |
Demonstrates a sufficient breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates a conceptual understanding of some specialised areas. |
Presents an evaluation of findings from a range of sources in order to draw some valid conclusions. Interprets some complex matters and ideas but with descriptive passages evident which lack clear purpose. Demonstrates creativity in places. Demonstrates sufficient problem- solving skills and initiative. |
Provides some reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. |
Some relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon. Some weaknesses in referencing technique. |
Writing style is occasionally not appropriate for the assessment. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are generally competent, but may pose minor difficulties for the reader. Some paragraphs may lack structure, and there is limited linking and signposting. Some appropriate vocabulary is used |
The presentational style and layout are largely correct for the type of assignment. Adequately structured. Inclusion of some figures, tables and images but not all clear, relevant and/or referred to. |
|
Borderline Fail |
Work addresses some of the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content.
One or more learning outcomes have not been met. |
Demonstrates a lack of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates Insufficient conceptual understanding of specialised areas. |
Presents a limited evaluation of findings from set sources. Descriptive or narrative passages evident which lack clear purpose. Demonstrates little creativity. Demonstrates insufficient problem- solving skills and initiative. |
Provides limited reflection and critical self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. |
Sources selected are limited and lack validity/relevance. Poor referencing technique employed. |
Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment. Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear in places. Paragraphs are poorly structured. |
For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking. Inclusion of figures, tables and images but not clear, relevant and/or referred to. |
|
Fail <34% |
Work does not address the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content. One or more learning outcomes have not been met. |
Demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates Insufficient conceptual understanding of relevant areas. |
Analysis is weak and poorly constructed with inadequate sources drawn upon. Demonstrates little or no creativity. Demonstrates a lack of problem- solving skills and initiative.
|
Provides inadequate reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. |
An absence of relevant sources selected and drawn upon. Poor referencing technique employed. |
Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment in question. Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear. Unstructured paragraphs. |
For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking.
Inclusion of figures, tables and images but not clear, relevant and/or referred to. |
Buy Custom Answer Of This BMP 6026 International HRM Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteIf you are falling short of time left and searching for expert help for your BMP 6026 International HRM Assignment at University Of Greater Manchester? Our team of professional writers provides top-quality HRM Assignment Help. Just write my assignment, and your assignment will be completed on time. We are ensuring you get the best results on our affordable Online Assignment Help. Contact us today for a plagiarism-free assignment solutions. This will help you stand out from the rest with better grades.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content