BMO0116 The Global Professional Assessment Brief | UoH

Published: 03 Sep, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Business
University University of Huddersfiled Module Title BMO0116 The Global Professional
Word Count 2500 Words
Assessment Type Individual Reflective/Reflexive Assignment

BMO0116 Assessment Task

Individual 2,500-word reflective and reflexive assignment

BMO0116 Task Specific Guidance:

You are required to write a 2500-word reflective and reflexive essay on your intercultural and professional development during the time you have studied at the University. This essay describes your experience. You are expected to tell your personal story. You should make specific reference to the content, materials, and models which you were introduced to in the lectures; the seminar discussions you have engaged with; your subject modules; and your independent group work collaboration.

  • To evidence your intercultural development, you are required to select 3 of the models that are introduced in the lectures and write both reflectively and reflexively on how you have applied these models to facilitate your intercultural development, providing examples from your intercultural experiences.
  • To evidence your professional development, you are required to examine how your future professional career or role will be enhanced by the understanding, skills and strategies developed on this module and write reflectively and reflexively about your experience of your course and subject modules, and the discussion questions you had in seminars. You must include clear self-development planning in terms of your future career goals. A final section of approximately 250 words focusing on your independent group work collaboration is also required.

Please see the table below for the structure of the assignment:

Section

Number of words

Overall Focus

Introduction

150

 

Module model: Choice #1

400

 

Intercultural Development

Module model: Choice #2

400

Module model: Choice #3

400

Employability: Course skills

& competencies

750

Professional Development

Group work collaboration

250

Conclusion

150

 

BMO0116 General study guidance:

  • Cite all information used in your work that is clearly from a source. Try to ensure that all sources in your reference list are seen as citations in your work, and all names cited in the work appear in your reference list.
  • Reference and cite your work in accordance with the APA 7th system – the University’s chosen referencing style. For specific advice, you can talk to your Business librarians or go to the library help desk.
  • The University has regulations relating to academic misconduct, including plagiarism. The Learning Innovation and Development Centre can advise and help you with how to avoid ‘poor scholarship’ and potential academic misconduct. You can contact them at busstudenthub@hud.ac.uk.
  • If you have any concerns about your writing, referencing, research or presentation skills, you are welcome to consult the Learning Innovation Development Centre team at busstudenthub@hud.ac.uk. It is possible to arrange a 1:1 consultation with a LIDC tutor once you have planned or written a section of your work, so that they can advise you on areas to develop.
  • Do not exceed the word limit.

BMO0116 Assessment Criteria

The Assessment Criteria are shown at the end of this document. Your tutor will discuss how your work will be assessed/marked and will explain how the assessment criteria apply to this piece of work. These criteria have been designed for your level of study.

These criteria will be used to mark your work and will be used to support the electronic feedback you receive on your marked assignment. Before submission, check that you have tried to meet the requirements of the higher-grade bands to the best of your ability. Please note that the marking process involves academic judgement and interpretation within the marking criteria.

The Learning Innovation Development Centre can help you understand and use the assessment criteria. To book an appointment, either visit them on The Street in the Charles Sikes Building or email them at busstudenthub@hud.ac.uk

BMO0116 Learning Outcomes

This section is for information only.

The assessment task outlined above has been designed to address specific validated learning outcomes for this module. It is useful to keep in mind that these are the things you need to show in this piece of work.

On completion of this module, students will need to demonstrate:

  • Have a theoretical and practical understanding of a range of frameworks, models and concepts which may be applied to your professional development for the global workplace
  • Have an awareness of the key elements and impact of intercultural effectiveness and employability skills on their working relationships
  • Have an awareness of the systematic process (such as reflection, reflexion, action planning and flexible response) for developing intercultural and professional skills for their specific subject area
  • Apply the principles of effective professional behaviour and intercultural effectiveness to a variety of common workplace scenarios
  • Have a clear understanding of personal position in terms of intercultural and professional effectiveness and potential for movement from that position
  • Express and justify their perspective on aspects of intercultural effectiveness and employability
  • Construct a proactive strategy for the expansion of their repertoire of behaviours to function effectively in a diverse workplace

Please note that these learning outcomes are not additional questions.

Appendix 1 PGT Assessment Criteria

These criteria are intended to help you understand how your work will be assessed. They describe different levels of performance of a given criterion.

Criteria are not weighted equally, and the marking process involves academic judgement and interpretation within the marking criteria.

The grades between Pass and Merit should be considered as different levels of performance within the normal bounds of the module. The higher-level categories allow for students who, in addition to fulfilling the basic requirement, perform at a superior level beyond the normal boundaries of the module and demonstrate intellectual creativity, originality and innovation.

PGT Generic Assessment Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Unsatisfactory

Pass

Merit

Distinction

0 9

10-19

20-34

35-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

80-89

90-100

Fulfilment of relevant learning outcomes

Not met or minimal

Not met or minimal

Not met or partially met

Not met or partially met

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Response to the question /task

No response

Little response

Insufficient response

Adequate response, but with limitations

Adequate response

Secure response to assessment task

Very good response to topic; elements of sophistication

Clear command of assessment task; sophisticated approach

Full command of assessment task; imaginative approach demonstrating flair and creativity


 

Unacceptable

A superficial answer with only peripheral knowledge of core material and very little critical ability

Unsatisfactory Some knowledge of core material but limited.

Pass

A coherent and logical answer which shows understanding of the basic

principles

Merit

A coherent answer that demonstrate s critical evaluation

Distinction

An exceptional answer that reflects outstanding knowledge of material and critical ability

 

0-9

10-19

20-34

35-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

80-89

90-100

   

 

 

             

Conceptual and critical understanding of contemporary

/ seminal knowledge in the subject

Entirely lacking in evidence of knowledge and understanding

Typically, only able to deal with terminology, basic facts and concepts

Knowledge of concepts falls short of prescribed range Typically only able to deal with terminology, basic facts and concepts

Marginally insufficient. Adequate knowledge of concepts within prescribed range but fails to adequately solve problems posed by assessment

A systematic understanding of knowledge; critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights; can evaluate critically current research and can evaluate methodologies

Approachin g excellence in some areas with evidence of the potential to undertake Research. Well- developed relevant argument, good degree of accuracy and technical

competence

Excellent. Displays (for example): high levels of accuracy; evidence of the potential to undertake research; the ability to analyse primary sources critically.

Insightful. Displays (for example): excellent research potential; flexibility of thought; possibly of publishable quality.

Striking and insightful. Displays (for example): publishable quality; outstanding research potential; originality and independent thought; ability to make informed judgements.

Presentation

Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language errors impact on intelligibility

Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language errors impact on

intelligibility

Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language errors impact on

intelligibility

Length requirement met and academic conventions mostly followed. Minor errors in language

Length requirement met and academic conventions mostly followed.

Possibly very minor errors in language

Good standard of presentation

; length requirement met, and academic conventions followed

Very good standards of presentation

Professional standards of presentation

Highest professional standards of presentation

Use of evidence and sources to support task

Some irrelevant and/or out of date Sources

Some irrelevant and/or out of date Sources

Some irrelevant and/or out of date Sources

Limited sources

Comprehensiv e understanding of techniques applicable to own research or advanced scholarship

Complex work and concepts presented, key texts used effectively

Full range of sources used selectively to support argument

Full range of sources used selectively to support argument

Full range of sources used selectively to support argument

Development of ideas

Argument not developed and may be confused and

incoherent

Argument not developed and may be confused and

incoherent

Argument not developed and may be confused and

incoherent

Argument not fully developed and may lack

structure

The argument is developed but may lack fluency

Argument concise and explicit

Coherent and compelling argument well presented

Coherent and compelling argument well presented

Coherent and compelling argument well presented

Depth of Reflection

Response demonstrates a

lack of

Response demonstrates

a lack of

Response demonstrates

a lack of

Response demonstrates a

minimal

Response demonstrates

reflection on,

Response demonstrate

s a general

In-depth reflection on,

and

In-depth reflection on,

and

In-depth reflection on,

and

 

reflection on, or personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.

reflection on, or personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.

reflection on, or personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.

reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments.

Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment.

and personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are generally supported.

Some relevant examples, when applicable, are provided.

reflection on, and personalizat ion of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretatio ns are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable

personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented.

 

Extensive evidence of analysis through questioning and challenging of assumptions leading to transformatio n of personal insight. Some evidence of reflexivity and self- development.

 

Well supported by clear, detailed examples as applicable.

personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented.

 

Extensive evidence of analysis through questioning and challenging of assumptions leading to transformatio n of personal insight.

Evidence of reflexivity and self- development.

 

Well supported by clear, detailed examples as applicable.

personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented.

 

Extensive evidence of analysis through questioning and challenging of assumptions leading to transformatio n of personal insight.

Substantial evidence of reflexivity and self- development.

 

Well supported by clear, detailed examples as

applicable.

Self- development planning

No evidence of self- development being considered

Self- development mentioned but no evidence of any planning

Self- development mentioned and some evidence of planning

Evidence of self- development planning and enacting

Evidence of self- development planning and enacting with support.

Self- developmen t planning and enacting with critical support.

Self- development programme developed and enacted with critical support.

Innovative self- development programme developed and enacted with critical support.

Innovative self- development programme developed and enacted enacting with detailed critical

support.

Achieve Higher Grades with BMO0116 Assignment Solutions

 Order Non-Plagiarized Assignment

Need last-minute help with your BMO0116 The Global Professional? We are here for assignment help! From Business Management to technical subjects, we’ve got you covered. Explore our free assignment samples and experience the quality for yourself. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress! We also provide University of Huddersfield Assignment Samples that have been written by the phd expert writers. 

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

COM7003 Cloud Security CW1 Assignment Example | BNU

Category: Assignment Example

Subject: Computer Science

University: Buckinghamshire New University (BNU)

Module Title: COM7003 Cloud Security

View Free Samples

BMO0112 Research Methods Proposal Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: University of Huddersfield

Module Title: BMO0112 Research Methods

View Free Samples

Customer Experience Strategy CW4 Formative Assessment Report Example | BPP

Category: Report Writing Example

Subject: Management

University: BPP Business School

Module Title: Customer Experience Strategy

View Free Samples

BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan) Assignment Sample 2024-25, Sem3 | BCU

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Birmingham City University

Module Title: BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan)

View Free Samples

RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Roehampton

Module Title: RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK