Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Huddersfiled | Module Title | BMO0116 The Global Professional |
Word Count | 2500 Words |
---|---|
Assessment Type | Individual Reflective/Reflexive Assignment |
Individual 2,500-word reflective and reflexive assignment
You are required to write a 2500-word reflective and reflexive essay on your intercultural and professional development during the time you have studied at the University. This essay describes your experience. You are expected to tell your personal story. You should make specific reference to the content, materials, and models which you were introduced to in the lectures; the seminar discussions you have engaged with; your subject modules; and your independent group work collaboration.
Please see the table below for the structure of the assignment:
Section |
Number of words |
Overall Focus |
Introduction |
150 |
|
Module model: Choice #1 |
400 |
Intercultural Development |
Module model: Choice #2 |
400 |
|
Module model: Choice #3 |
400 |
|
Employability: Course skills & competencies |
750 |
Professional Development |
Group work collaboration |
250 |
|
Conclusion |
150 |
|
The Assessment Criteria are shown at the end of this document. Your tutor will discuss how your work will be assessed/marked and will explain how the assessment criteria apply to this piece of work. These criteria have been designed for your level of study.
These criteria will be used to mark your work and will be used to support the electronic feedback you receive on your marked assignment. Before submission, check that you have tried to meet the requirements of the higher-grade bands to the best of your ability. Please note that the marking process involves academic judgement and interpretation within the marking criteria.
The Learning Innovation Development Centre can help you understand and use the assessment criteria. To book an appointment, either visit them on The Street in the Charles Sikes Building or email them at busstudenthub@hud.ac.uk
This section is for information only.
The assessment task outlined above has been designed to address specific validated learning outcomes for this module. It is useful to keep in mind that these are the things you need to show in this piece of work.
On completion of this module, students will need to demonstrate:
Please note that these learning outcomes are not additional questions.
These criteria are intended to help you understand how your work will be assessed. They describe different levels of performance of a given criterion.
Criteria are not weighted equally, and the marking process involves academic judgement and interpretation within the marking criteria.
The grades between Pass and Merit should be considered as different levels of performance within the normal bounds of the module. The higher-level categories allow for students who, in addition to fulfilling the basic requirement, perform at a superior level beyond the normal boundaries of the module and demonstrate intellectual creativity, originality and innovation.
|
Unacceptable |
Unsatisfactory |
Pass |
Merit |
Distinction |
||||
0 – 9 |
10-19 |
20-34 |
35-49 |
50-59 |
60-69 |
70-79 |
80-89 |
90-100 |
|
Fulfilment of relevant learning outcomes |
Not met or minimal |
Not met or minimal |
Not met or partially met |
Not met or partially met |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Response to the question /task |
No response |
Little response |
Insufficient response |
Adequate response, but with limitations |
Adequate response |
Secure response to assessment task |
Very good response to topic; elements of sophistication |
Clear command of assessment task; sophisticated approach |
Full command of assessment task; imaginative approach demonstrating flair and creativity |
|
Unacceptable A superficial answer with only peripheral knowledge of core material and very little critical ability |
Unsatisfactory Some knowledge of core material but limited. |
Pass A coherent and logical answer which shows understanding of the basic principles |
Merit A coherent answer that demonstrate s critical evaluation |
Distinction An exceptional answer that reflects outstanding knowledge of material and critical ability |
||||
|
0-9 |
10-19 |
20-34 |
35-49 |
50-59 |
60-69 |
70-79 |
80-89 |
90-100 |
|
Conceptual and critical understanding of contemporary / seminal knowledge in the subject |
Entirely lacking in evidence of knowledge and understanding |
Typically, only able to deal with terminology, basic facts and concepts |
Knowledge of concepts falls short of prescribed range Typically only able to deal with terminology, basic facts and concepts |
Marginally insufficient. Adequate knowledge of concepts within prescribed range but fails to adequately solve problems posed by assessment |
A systematic understanding of knowledge; critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights; can evaluate critically current research and can evaluate methodologies |
Approachin g excellence in some areas with evidence of the potential to undertake Research. Well- developed relevant argument, good degree of accuracy and technical competence |
Excellent. Displays (for example): high levels of accuracy; evidence of the potential to undertake research; the ability to analyse primary sources critically. |
Insightful. Displays (for example): excellent research potential; flexibility of thought; possibly of publishable quality. |
Striking and insightful. Displays (for example): publishable quality; outstanding research potential; originality and independent thought; ability to make informed judgements. |
Presentation |
Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language errors impact on intelligibility |
Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language errors impact on intelligibility |
Length requirements may not be observed; does not follow academic conventions; language errors impact on intelligibility |
Length requirement met and academic conventions mostly followed. Minor errors in language |
Length requirement met and academic conventions mostly followed. Possibly very minor errors in language |
Good standard of presentation ; length requirement met, and academic conventions followed |
Very good standards of presentation |
Professional standards of presentation |
Highest professional standards of presentation |
Use of evidence and sources to support task |
Some irrelevant and/or out of date Sources |
Some irrelevant and/or out of date Sources |
Some irrelevant and/or out of date Sources |
Limited sources |
Comprehensiv e understanding of techniques applicable to own research or advanced scholarship |
Complex work and concepts presented, key texts used effectively |
Full range of sources used selectively to support argument |
Full range of sources used selectively to support argument |
Full range of sources used selectively to support argument |
Development of ideas |
Argument not developed and may be confused and incoherent |
Argument not developed and may be confused and incoherent |
Argument not developed and may be confused and incoherent |
Argument not fully developed and may lack structure |
The argument is developed but may lack fluency |
Argument concise and explicit |
Coherent and compelling argument well presented |
Coherent and compelling argument well presented |
Coherent and compelling argument well presented |
Depth of Reflection |
Response demonstrates a lack of |
Response demonstrates a lack of |
Response demonstrates a lack of |
Response demonstrates a minimal |
Response demonstrates reflection on, |
Response demonstrate s a general |
In-depth reflection on, and |
In-depth reflection on, and |
In-depth reflection on, and |
|
reflection on, or personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided. |
reflection on, or personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided. |
reflection on, or personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided. |
reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment. |
and personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are generally supported. Some relevant examples, when applicable, are provided. |
reflection on, and personalizat ion of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretatio ns are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable |
personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented.
Extensive evidence of analysis through questioning and challenging of assumptions leading to transformatio n of personal insight. Some evidence of reflexivity and self- development.
Well supported by clear, detailed examples as applicable. |
personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented.
Extensive evidence of analysis through questioning and challenging of assumptions leading to transformatio n of personal insight. Evidence of reflexivity and self- development.
Well supported by clear, detailed examples as applicable. |
personalizatio n of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented.
Extensive evidence of analysis through questioning and challenging of assumptions leading to transformatio n of personal insight. Substantial evidence of reflexivity and self- development.
Well supported by clear, detailed examples as applicable. |
Self- development planning |
No evidence of self- development being considered |
Self- development mentioned but no evidence of any planning |
Self- development mentioned and some evidence of planning |
Evidence of self- development planning and enacting |
Evidence of self- development planning and enacting with support. |
Self- developmen t planning and enacting with critical support. |
Self- development programme developed and enacted with critical support. |
Innovative self- development programme developed and enacted with critical support. |
Innovative self- development programme developed and enacted enacting with detailed critical support. |
Achieve Higher Grades with BMO0116 Assignment Solutions
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentNeed last-minute help with your BMO0116 The Global Professional? We are here for assignment help! From Business Management to technical subjects, we’ve got you covered. Explore our free assignment samples and experience the quality for yourself. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress! We also provide University of Huddersfield Assignment Samples that have been written by the phd expert writers.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content