BKM6321 Strategic Management Level HE6 Assessment Brief Term 2 2024/25

Published: 01 Aug, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Management
University Amity University (IN) London Module Title BKM6321 Strategic Management
Term: 2
Level: 6
Assignment 1:  AS1 Formal group oral presentation (15 mins)
Assignment 2:  Individual assignment (AS2), management report, (3000 Words)

Assignment Brief     

1. Purpose of the Assessment

The overall purpose of the assessment is to test the student’s knowledge of core concepts and frameworks relevant to the strategy process, and to allow students to apply their learning in the module in the case study analysis and to present their findings in a logical and coherent manner that captures the key issues.

2. Assessment Tasks:

2.1. AS1 Formal group oral presentation (15 mins) using Power Point slides. weighting 30% of the mark (LO1)

You are required to study the attached MULBERRY case study from a strategic management perspective. Present with your group an analysis of the issues using key strategy tools and concepts. As a guide use the following framework:

  1. What was Mulberry’s “Old” strategy? Give a reasoned explanation. 
  2. Was this strategy successful? If so, why? What were the underlying features of this strategy in terms of focus, scope and industry segment factors?
  3. What was the “new” strategy followed by Mulberry? Why did it “fail”? Explore the various reasons and issues.
  4. What are your overall conclusion & lessons from this case?

Note:

1-Be critical and focus on the reasons & why “things” happen. 
2-Discuss your approach and presentation structure with the tutor. 
3-Do make use of the slides, articles and videos used in class.
4-Relate your investigation to the issues and themes covered in the class
3    - There is lot of data available online. Further, refer to Inews paper. Guardian, Daily Telegraph newspapers, BBC online news.
4-Use the Birkbeck or the local library to gain access to FT newspaper and the Economist.

The required task must critically evaluate and synthesise the current state of the “situation and issues” within the selected case. Therefore, it is recommended that only articles and text published in the last 10 years (in majority of cases) be reviewed for this assessment. 

Do submit your presentation slides, please go to the ‘Submit your work’ area of the Module Moodle site. It is important that you submit your work to the correct module Moodle site, and that your work is submitted on time. EACH MEMBER OF THE GROUP MUST SUBMIT THE SLIDES INDIVIDUALLY.

Word Limit: there is no set word limits on your presentation or number of slides. However, it is required that your presentation falls within the 10-15 min. range. Also, while the design of the presentation is at your discretion it is expected that your slides are visually attractive and easy to read.

Style requirements: except for the titles and subtitles, you should not highlight text, which must be in Arial size 11, without indentations. The main title should be highlighted in font size 16, and the subtitles highlighted in size 14. The margins should be justified, not aligned to the left. Additionally, the space between lines should be single and the space between paragraphs should be double. Separate presentation skills guidance will be provided by the tutor in the class. It is advisable to discuss your presentation format with the tutor.

2.2 Individual assignment (AS2), management report, weighting 70% of the mark (LO2 & LO3), 3000 words

You are required to complete the assignment by the date given. In order to undertake the assignment, you should critically evaluate the case study STARBUCKS (Provided on Moodle).

You should also be prepared to undertake further internet-based research on the organisation You should only use material drawn from credible sources such as: academic articles and texts; annual reports; industry surveys; quality market research data bases, e.g., Mintel; quality newspaper and business periodicals, e.g., the FT and even corporate biographies. You should not use unreliable sources such as non-reviewed websites, e.g., Wikipedia, Mind map.

This is an integrative and topical case. The case offers an opportunity to assess why STARBUCKS business strategy has been successful and to evaluate the current strategy in relation to its competitive advantage and core competencies issues discussed in class. What is so unique about this company? Is the organisations competitive advantage sustainable? Further, how is the organisation exploiting its capabilities & what are their value chain activities which others find it difficult to copy?

Note: 
1-Be critical and focus on the reasons & why “things” happen. 
2-Discuss your approach and presentation structure with the tutor. 
3-Do make use of the slides, articles and videos used in class. 
4-Do write in your own words. No blind cut & paste.
5-Relate your investigation to the issues and themes covered in the class sessions.

This assignment is all about applying models and concepts to case issues, in order to make your own judgments and conclusions. Use the models in an applied sense – do not describe them – and also be prepared to use them critically, e.g., modify or adapt them. You do not have to accept them blindly. We are also looking for your own ideas supported and guided by the models and case data so be bold in expressing your own opinions. It is up to you to select and apply the most useful models, obviously you cannot use all the models you will cover on the module; what you need to do is carefully choose a small number of relevant models and apply them in-depth.

It is also important that you use case data effectively to support your answers and that your analysis uses both quantitative and qualitative sources.

Finally, pay attention to your writing style. I am asking you to conduct an assignment that could be presented to two audiences: your academic examiners and as a management report. 

Some Specific Guidelines:

  • Do introduce what you are investigating, its purpose and its context. State your objective up front.
  • Do be critical and reflective.
  • Do be applied.
  • Do make your discussion and argument coherent. Link them directly to issues raised.
  • Do identify implications/lessons which arise from your evaluation.

Therefore, do ensure:

  • Do not “blindly” use SWOT/PESTL/5Fs.
  • Do reference properly using the Harvard standard
  • Ensure each paragraph links to the next one (use connective text where possible)
  • Arguments are fully backed up and not left ’hanging”.
  • Each section/question ends with a clear conclusion
  • Develop a ‘tight’ writing style that is unambiguous.

Some General Guidelines:

This assignment is all about applying models and concepts to managerial issues in order to make your own judgments and conclusions. Use the models in an applied sense – do not describe them – and also be prepared to use them critically, e.g., modify or adapt them.  You do not have to accept them blindly.  We are also looking for your own ideas supported and guided by the models and case data so be bold in expressing your own opinions.  It is up to you to select and apply the most useful models, obviously you cannot use all the models you will cover on the module; what you need to do is carefully choose a small number of relevant models and apply them in-depth. 
Word Limit: The assessment should be limited to 3,000 words (+/- 10%). If the word count is more than 2,700 words or less than 3,300 words you must revise the text judiciously to deliver work within the stated limits. This limit excludes appendices (please keep these to a minimum) and your references.

Style requirements: Except for the Titles and subtitles, you are not allowed to highlight text, which will be in Arial size 11, and without indentations. The main title is highlighted in size 16, and the subtitles are highlighted in size 14. The margins should be justified, not aligned to the left. Additionally, the space between lines should be single and the space between paragraphs should be double. The work will be in Management Report form and not the Essay form requiring and Introduction, the main body with subtitles and a conclusion. You must have an Executive Summary and a Content page.

Order Custom Answers for your BKM6321 Assignment

Request to Buy Answer

3. Sources

It is expected that the Reference List of the report will contain at least fifteen sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include three refereed academic journals and five academic books.

4. Specific Assessment Criteria

Assignment 1:

You are required to evaluate Mulberry case in terms of:

  • Understanding underlying rationale of strategy + How the organisation is competing: : 25/100 marks 
  • Understanding the nature of strategy and its management: 25/100 marks
  • Linking the Impact of changes in in internal & external focus and environment changes:  25/100 marks
  • Discussion of  lessons & conclusions arising from the investigation: 25/100 marks 

Total marks awarded: 100

Assignment 2: STARBUCKS  Case

You are required to evaluate Starbucks case in terms of

  • Use appropriate academic models and relevant case information. Explain and evaluate the strategy of the organisation and how it is competing (30/100) marks
  • Assess the core competencies and key capabilities of the company + Linkages of Value chain activities. (30/100) marks
  • Discuss the organisations competitive advantage factors. State your overall assessment (25/100) marks
  • Level of presentation, structure, and link to literature of your report (15/100) marks

Total marks awarded: 100

5. Assessment Submission

Your assignment must be word processed and presented in a report format with simple sub-headings. The word count should be as specified in the assignment above±10% (tables, diagrams and appendices are excluded from the count).  
The Assignment report should have a Front Sheet showing your name, your student number, the module name, the module number, the assignment title, the module tutor's name, the date and the word count.  

All assignments will be submitted, graded and fed-back electronically via TURNITIN. Several submissions will be permitted before the hand-in date in order to enable you to refine the content in your report.

To submit your work, please go to the ‘Submit your work’ area of the Module Moodle site. It is important that you submit your work to the correct module Moodle site, and that your work is submitted on time. 

Feedback on assignments for everyone will be provided electronically via TURNITIN.  

A student may obtain an individual appointment to discuss feedback with the tutor.

Submission Deadlines

Assignment 1: In class Group Presentation: 4th April 2025 

You must upload the presentation on Moodle by the deadline.

Assignment 2: 16th June 2025  Upload the assignment on the Moodle


6. Assessment Guidance 

The quality of your presentation and academic referencing is very important. Please, use the Harvard Referencing System.

Within your assignment your tutor will be looking for content that addresses the key elements of the assignment brief.
 
Try not to overcomplicate your answers by choosing a company that you know little about. Keep to simple processes that you know well.

7. Academic Practice

AS2 is an individual assignment. Amity University [IN] London policy will apply in all cases of copying, plagiarism or any other methods by which students have obtained (or attempted to obtain) an unfair advantage.

Support and guidance on assessments and academic integrity can be found from the following resources:

  Moodle / Policies and Procedures 
  Moodle / Student Corner

8. Learning Outcomes:

On completion of the module the students will be able to:

LO 1 – Critically appraise different theoretical concepts and models of strategic management in contemporary business environment.

LO 2– Critically appraise the impact of change management and sustainability on strategic management.

LO 3 – Critically analyse and review an organisation’s strategic plan.  

9. Indicative Schedule:

Session 1

General introduction + Rationale + Assessment + What is strategy framework?

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 2

What is strategy/ framework?

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 3

External industry/ environment analysis

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 4

External industry/ environment analysis

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 5

Internal analysis

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 6

General summation

 

Session 7

Internal analysis

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 8

Means & methods – Understanding competitive advantage

Group  Presentation: AS1 – 4th April 2025

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 9

Means & methods – Understanding competitive advantage

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 10

Implementation of strategy

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 11

Implementation of strategy

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

Session 12

Bring it all together + AS 2 Briefing

Relevant Chapter + Articles + Videos

 

AS 2 Deadline – 16th June 2025

 

General Assessment Guidelines for Written Assessments Level HE6 

 

%

Relevance

Knowledge

Argument/Analysis

Structure

Presentation

Written English

Research/Referencing

Class I(Exce
ptional

Quality)

85-100%

 

 

 

Directly relevant to title.  

Expertly addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.

Demonstrates an exceptional knowledge/ understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and analysis of the most important issues.

Makes exceptional use of appropriate arguments and/or theoretical models.

Presents an analysis of the material resulting in clear, logical and original conclusions.

Coherently articulated andlogically structured.

An appropriate format is used.  

The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment.

Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP).

An exceptionally well written answer with standard spelling and grammar.

Style is clear, resourceful and academic.

Sources accurately cited in the text. A
wide range of contemporary and

relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style.

Class I
(Excellent

Quality)

70-84%

 

 

 

Directly relevant to title.  

Addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.

Demonstrates an excellent knowledge/
understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and summary of the most important issues.

Makes creative use of appropriate arguments and/or theoretical models. Presents an excellent discussion of the material resulting in clear, logical conclusions.

Coherently articulated and logically structured.

An appropriate format is used.  

The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment.

Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP).

An excellently written
answer with standard spelling and grammar.

Style is clear, resourceful and academic.

 

Sources accurately cited in the text. A range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style.

Class II/i
(Very Good Quality)

60-69%

Directly relevant to title.

Addresses most of the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.

Demonstrates a very good knowledge/understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and summary of key issues.

Uses sound arguments or theoretical models.

Presents a clear and valid discussion of the material.

Clear, logical conclusions.

Logically constructed in the main.

An appropriate format is used.  

The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of FTP.

A very well written answer with standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear and academic.

 

Sources are accurately cited in the text and an appropriate reference list in the correct style is provided.

Class II/ii
(Good Quality)

 

50-59%

Generally, addresses the title/brief, but sometimes considers irrelevant issues.

Demonstrates a good knowledge/understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and summary of some key issues.

Presents largely coherent arguments. Some issues and theoretical models expressed in simplistic terms. Conclusions are fairly clear and logical.

For the most part coherently articulated and logically structured. An acceptable format is used.

The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment.

Inclusion of FTP but lacks selectivity.

Competently written with minor lapses in spelling and grammar. Style is readable and academic in the main.

 

Most sources accurately cited in the text and an appropriate reference list is provided which is largely in the correct style.

Class III
(Satisfactory Quality)

40-49%

Some degree of irrelevance to the title/brief.  

Superficial consideration of the issues.

Demonstrates an adequate knowledge/
understanding of theory and practice for this level. An attempt is made to identify key issues.

Presents basic arguments but focus and consistency lacking in places. Some issues may lack clarity, and/or theoretical models expressed in simplistic terms. Conclusions are not always clear or logical.

Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure.

An acceptable format is used.

The presentational style & layout is largely correct for the type of assignment.

Inappropriate use of FTP or not used where clearly needed to aid understanding.

Generally, competently written although intermittent lapses in grammar and spelling pose obstacles for the reader. Style limits communication and is non-academic in a number of places.

Some relevant sources cited.

 

Some weaknesses in referencing technique.

Borderline

Fail

 

35-39%

 

Significant degree of irrelevance to the title/brief. Only the most obvious issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms.  

Demonstrates weaknesses in knowledge of theory and practice for this level, with poor understanding of key issues.

Limited arguments, which lack clarity in places.

Conclusions are neither clear nor logical.

Poorly structured.

 

Lack of articulation.

Format deficient.

For the type of assignment, the presentational style &/or layout is lacking.

FTP ignored in text or not used where clearly needed.

Deficiencies in spelling and grammar make reading difficult.

Simplistic or repetitious style impairs clarity.

Style is non-academic.

Limited sources and weak referencing.  

Fail

 

<34%

 

Relevance to the title/brief is intermittent or missing.

The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms.  

Demonstrates a lack of basic knowledge of either theory or practice for this level, with little evidence of understanding.

Severely limited arguments.

Lacks clarity.

Conclusions are sparse.

Unstructured.

Lack of articulation. Format deficient

For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking.

FTP as above.

Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in grammar, spelling and expression.

Style is non-academic.

An absence of academic sources and poor referencing technique.

Hire Experts to solve BKM6321 Assignment before your Deadline

Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

Looking for the solution of the BKM6321 Strategic Management Assignment? Look no further! There are specialized professionals for all categories of assignments who offer you plagiarism-free and superior content. You are assured that our Strategic Management Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. A free list of assignment samples written by PhD experts is also provided here that can help you boost your study power and check the quality of the assignment. So contact us today and get your top-notch assignment!

View the solution related of Strategic Management click here: Strategic Management

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Roehampton

Module Title: RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management

View Free Samples

HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership AS2 Reflective Portfolio Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Northampton

Module Title: HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership

View Free Samples

ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: University of Greenwich (UOG)

Module Title: ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners

View Free Samples

NUR7011 Developing Healthcare Leaders Assignment Sample | BPP

Category: Assignment

Subject: Nursing

University: BPP University

Module Title: NUR7011 Developing Healthcare Leaders

View Free Samples

Project Management, Leadership and Skills: Planning & Control Portfolio Example

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Salford Manchester

Module Title: Project Management, Leadership and Skills: Planning & Control

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK