| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | - | Module Title | Leadership Profile Interview and Analytical |
| Word Count | 2000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Report |
| Assessment Title | Assessment 1 |
Students are to identify and interview a leader they know, someone known to them in a personal or work capacity, not someone they know of, like Mahatma Gandhi, the King or Queen of Bhutan, Bill Gates, or Oprah Winfrey. The interview will inform an analytical report on the leader’s individual qualities and situational factors contributing to their leadership success.
The purpose of the interview is for students to engage with a leader familiar to them, and to collect information to aid them in profiling the leader’s leadership traits, characteristics, style, behaviours, and/or other situational factors that drive leadership success or failure (ULO2).
In preparation for the interview, students are to design a set of interview questions, which forms part of the word count. The design of the interview questions is an assessable demonstration of students’ understanding of the theories/concepts of the unit (ULO1).
The data and findings from the interview should then be presented in the form of an analytical report. The report should be informed by the theories, concepts, and discussions about leadership considered in this unit (ULO1).
The profile presented in the report should also include reflective comments on what the interviewer sees as important in leadership. In this sense, the leadership competencies highlighted by the interview and illustrated in the leader’s profile could serve to model the development of the interviewer’s own leadership competencies (ULO3). This can contribute to work towards Assessment 3, the Leadership Development Plan.
To sum up, this assignment has three components:
1. Design of interview questions
2. Conduct of interview
3. Preparation of an analytical report.
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
|
|
|
|
ULO 1 Contextualizing Leadership Theory |
30 to >23.9 pts High Distinction (HD) Interview questions are explicitly informed by unit theories/concepts and adapted to the interviewee’s context.
|
23.9 to >20.9 pts Distinction (D) Questions are relevant and clearly linked to leadership theories/concepts and are relevant to the context. |
20.9 to >17.9 pts Credit (C) Questions connected to theories/concepts, maybe lacking direct relevance to the interviewee’s context. |
17.9 to >14.9 pts Pass (P) Questions with vague connection to theories/concepts, superficial, and obliquely relevant to context. |
14.9 to >0 pts Fail (F) Poorly constructed or missing questions; no clear theoretical foundation. |
30 pts |
||
|
ULO 2 Analysis of Leadership Qualities and Situational Factors |
40 to >31.9 pts High Distinction (HD) Report contains sophisticated analysis and differentiation of traits and qualities in relation to interviewee’s conduct, especially in relation to situational dynamics. |
31.9 to >27.9 pts Distinction (D) Clear analysis and differentiation of leadership qualities and context in relation to interviewee conduct; situational factors accounted for. |
27.9 to >23.9 pts Credit (C) Evident differentiation of qualities and traits, perhaps only loosely articulated with interview conduct and situational factors. |
|
23.9 to >19.9 pts |
19 |
.9 to >0 pts |
40 pts |
|
Pass (P) Analysis not clearly differentiated traits, qualities or situational factors, perhaps focusing only on interviewee characteristics and situation. |
Fail (F) Very poor or missing analysis; no differentiation made. |
|||||||
|
ULO 3 Reflections on development of leadership competencies |
|
20 pts |
||||||
|
|
20 to >15.9 pts High Distinction (HD) Leadership profile reflects competencies evidently of interest to interviewer, as indicated by commentary structurally integrated into report. Shows explicit potential for use in modelling competency development for Assessment 3. |
15.9 to >13.9 pts Distinction (D) Profile reflects competencies of interest to interviewer, reflective comment evident, perhaps not strongly structured into the report. Shows potential for competency development for Assessment 3 |
13.9 to >11.9 pts Credit (C) Profile reflects competencies of interviewee perhaps implicitly related to interviewer; report may lack reflective comment. Shows potential for competency development for Assessment 3 |
11.9 to >9.9 pts Pass (P) Competencies of interviewee not clearly related to interviewee’s self-awareness; reflective commentary may be absent. Little or no evident awareness of competency development for Assessment 3 |
9.9 to >0 pts Fail (F) No evidence of connection between profile and interviewer’s self-awareness of competencies, no evidence of connecting this assessment piece to Assessment 3 |
|
|
ULO 4 Structure, |
10 to >7.9 pts High Distinction (HD) Fluent, professional writing; excellent structure; consistent and logical referencing. |
7.9 to >6.9 pts Distinction (D) |
6.9 to >5.9 pts Credit (C) |
5.9 to >4.9 pts Pass (P) |
4.9 to >0 pts Fail (F) |
|
|
Language, and Referencing |
Clear writing; minor issues in structure or referencing. |
Adequate writing; some errors in structure or referencing. |
Poor structure; frequent errors. |
Very poor presentation; disorganized, incorrect or missing referencing. |
10 pts |
|
|
Total Points: 100 |
||||||
Achieve Higher Grades with Leadership Profile Interview Assignment Solutions
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentNeed last-minute help with your Leadership Profile Interview and Analytical Assignment? We are here for leadership assignment help! From Business Management to technical subjects, we’ve got you covered. Explore our free assignment samples and experience the quality for yourself. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
