| Category | Assignment | Subject | Nursing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | The Open University | Module Title | Health and Social Care |
| Word Count | 1000 Words |
|---|
Before attempting this coursework assignment, Learners must familiarise themselves with the following policies:
Can be found at the Qualifi Level 3 Diploma in Business Management
In submitting the assignment, Learners must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count.
Your accredited study centre will direct you to the appropriate software that checks the level of similarity.
Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution.
Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work that is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence
Please familiarise yourself with Qualifi’s Malpractice and Maladministration policy, where you can find further information
A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.
The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however, the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.
Qualifi recommends using the Harvard Style of Referencing throughout your work.
You may include appendices to support your work; however, appendices must only contain additional supporting information and must be referenced in your assignment.
You may also include tables, graphs, diagrams, a Gantt chart and flowcharts that support the main report should be incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted.
Any published secondary information, such as annual reports and company literature, should be referenced in the main text of the assignment, under the Harvard Style Referencing, and referenced at the end of the assignment.
Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that organisation about its inclusion.
Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to that particular organisation.
Learners must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%. These rules exclude the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices and information contained within references and bibliographies.
When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the supporting notes only.
All work is to be submitted on the due date as per the Centre’s advice.
All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file) or via Turnitin, where applicable.
This should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy posted to the Centre Manager (if required)
Qualifi uses a standard marking rubric for all assignments, and you can find the details at the end of this document. Unless stated elsewhere, Learners must answer all questions in this document.
Show understanding of the main roles and responsibilities of health and social care workers when delivering care.
1.1: Explain how health and social care professionals protect individuals in their care.
1.2: Discuss the mechanisms for reporting poor practice in health and social care.
Assessment Criteria
1.1: Explain how health and social care professionals protect individuals in their care.
1.2: Discuss the mechanisms for reporting poor practice in health and social care.
Show understanding of the importance of regulatory bodies in the delivery of high-quality care.
2.1: Discuss the roles of regulatory bodies that inspect health and social care provision.
2.2: Identify the professional bodies that regulate the professions within health and social care.
Assessment Criteria
2.1: Discuss the roles of regulatory bodies that inspect health and social care provision.
2.2: Identify the professional bodies that regulate the professions within health and social care.
Evaluate the role of the inter-professional team in delivering health and social care.
3.1: Explain the roles and responsibilities of the inter-professional team in meeting care needs in the case study.
3.2: Discuss the difference between multidisciplinary and inter-professional team working.
3.3: Discuss the potential barriers to teamwork and how they could be overcome.
Assessment Criteria
3.1: Explain the roles and responsibilities of the inter-professional team in meeting care needs in the case study.
3.2: Discuss the difference between multidisciplinary and inter-professional team working.
3.3: Discuss the potential barriers to teamwork and how they could be overcome.
| Criteria | Distinguished (80+) | Excellent (70) | Good (60) | Proficient (50) | Basic (40) | Marginal (30) | Unacceptable (0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (alignment with assessment criteria) | Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking | Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes coherent original thinking | Adequate evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic descriptions; includes original thinking | Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinking | Describes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of evaluation; confused original thinking | Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking | Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic |
| Application of Theory and Literature | In-depth, detailed and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas and concept | Clear and relevant application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts | Appropriate application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts | Adequate application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts | Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently | Confused application of theory; does not use literature for support | Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature |
| Knowledge and Understanding | Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and concepts | Comprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts | Sound understanding of principles and concepts | Basic Knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | Limited and superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | Confused or inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles |
| Presentation and Writing Skills | Logical, coherent and polished presentation exceeding expectations at this level; free from errors in mechanics and syntax | Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating mastery; free from errors in mechanics and syntax | Logical structure to presentation; makes a few errors in mechanics and syntax, which do not prohibit meaning | Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax | Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning | Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often interfere with meaning | Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors that interfere with meaning |
| Referencing | Advanced use of in-text citation and references | Mastery of in-text citation and referencing | Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing | Adequate use of in-text citation and referencing | Limited use of in-text citation and referencing | Inadequate use of citations and referencing | Little or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of sources |
1. For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right that best reflects the student’s
work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay).
2. Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for
improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.”
3. To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at the final mark.
Example:
| Range | |
|---|---|
| Distinguished | 80 – 100 |
| Excellent | 70 – 79 |
| Good | 60 – 69 |
| Proficient | 50 – 59 |
| Basic | 40 – 49 |
| Marginal | 35 – 39 |
| Unacceptable | 0 – 34 |
| Criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| Content | 50 |
| Application of Theory and Literature | 40 |
| Knowledge and Understanding | 50 |
| Presentation/Writing Skills | 40 |
| Referencing | 40 |
Need Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments
Order Non-Plagiarized AssignmentSeeking help with your Health and Social Care, now stress-free and get Professional Help With Nursing assignments from our expert team. we also provide free assignment samples that have been written by PhD expert writers. We are available 24/7 to assist you. Now, be tension-free and focus on studying and give your assignment to our expert team. We will deliver your assignment before the deadline with well-researched results. Contact us today and boost your academic grades!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
