| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Harper Adams University (HAU) | Module Title | A7080 Recent Advances in Ruminant Nutrition |
| Word Count | 3500 |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Individual Assignment |
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |
(Online submission only)
Module Name (Module Code): Recent Advances in Ruminant Nutrition (A7080)
Assignment Title: Recent Advances in Ruminant Nutrition
Assignment Type: Individual Assignment
Time Guide: 20 hours
Word/Page Limit 3500 (excluding figures, tables or references):
File Type: Acceptable file types for Turnitin: MS Word, Excel & PowerPoint, the Non-Flat version of PDF is acceptable however cannot include video or audio embedded (please delete as applicable)
File Size Limit: 50 MB
Submission Deadline: 15.00 on Thursday 11th December 2025
Please ensure that your student number is included at the beginning of your submission title when uploading your work
Resources to support the appropriate use of AI can be found on The Learning Hub. The university encourages ethical, responsible use of AI.
Where permitted AI has been used this must be acknowledged at the beginning of the assignment as per the Academic Integrity and Academic Misconduct Policy.
Submission declaration: In submitting this assignment I/we declare that the work is my/our own work and that it meets the standards of academic integrity expected at all times. I/we also confirm that this work conforms to the stated Artificial Intelligence guidance for this assignment brief and has not previously been submitted for assessment for an academic award, unless otherwise indicated.
Students should work individually.
Write a technical report on one of the following topics. An alternative topic that is directly related to your work can be used after discussion and agreement with the Module Leader.
Need Expert Help for Your A7080 Individual Assignment?
Request to Buy AnswerThe assignment should be presented in the form of a written report in the general style of the journal Animal. It should include a very brief abstract and introduction at the beginning. All references used should conform with the style provided in Animal. The Harper Adams’ Guide to Report Writing is available through the library intranet home page for report formats Harper Adams University Study guides and advice should be used for general guidance, but the style should be that of Animal, and an example review paper from Animal is available on the Learning Hub. A wide variety of information sources may be used, but the main focus must be on peer reviewed papers. The list of references is not included in the word count. Use of tables of data and figures to illustrate and support your points is expected, but is not included in the word count.
|
Presentation, style and communication skills |
Content, knowledge and understanding |
Analysis, evaluation and application |
Referencing and use of literature |
|
|
Context |
Presentation should be in the style of an article for Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition |
A relevant and topical subject in ruminant nutrition that is researched using relevant and reliable information sources |
Provides practical advice that can be used by those in the feed industry that is based on sound evidence |
Use of references in the text should comply with the style of the example A full list of references must be provided at the end of the article and presented in a format that comply with the HAU Guide to Referencing |
|
Weighting Mark range |
10 |
45 |
25 |
20 |
|
90-100 |
Exceptional presentation that conforms to guidelines and displays creativity, flair and imagination in both structure and style, using a variety of tools appropriate to the audience and discipline. |
Work based on an excellent understanding and knowledge of ruminant nutrition obtained from specific published literature appropriate for Level 7 that is at the forefront of the discipline through wider reading. Publishable quality. |
Exceptional arguments based on a highly critical and perceptive analysis and evaluation of complex knowledge and concepts relating to the topic at Level 7. Excellent practical application that will significantly benefit ruminant nutrition. |
Exceptional use of a variety of reliable, appropriate sources for Level 7, including peer reviewed journals, selected independently. Limitations of sources assessed. References complete and comply with the Guide to Referencing. No errors. |
|
80-89 |
Excellent presentation that conforms to guidelines and provides a persuasive argument using a logical and coherent structure that displays a mature, articulate and imaginative style, using appropriate tools for the audience and discipline. |
Work based on a full and complete understanding of appropriate knowledge of ruminant nutrition for Level 7. Evidence of specific knowledge from published literature obtained through wider reading. Publishable quality with minimal editing |
Excellent arguments based on a critical and perceptive analysis and evaluation of knowledge and concepts relating to the chosen topic at Level 7. Very good practical application that will be of considerable benefit ruminant nutrition. |
Excellent use of a variety of reliable, appropriate sources for Level 7, including peer reviewed journals, most selected independently. Limitations of sources partly assessed. References complete and comply with the Guide to Referencing. No errors. |
|
70-79 |
Very good presentation that conforms to guidelines and provides a reasoned argument using a logical and concise structure that displays a lucid and articulate style, using appropriate tools for the audience and discipline. |
Work based on a comprehensive understanding of appropriate knowledge of ruminant nutrition for Level 7. No omissions. Clear evidence of knowledge derived from outside the teaching programme. Publishable quality with moderate editing |
Strong argument based on robust analysis and evaluation of knowledge, and concepts that relate chosen topic at level 7. Very good practical application that will be of major benefit ruminant nutrition. |
Very good use of reliable, appropriate sources for Level 7, including peer reviewed journals, many selected independently. References are complete and comply with the Guide to Referencing with no errors. |
|
60-69 |
Good presentation that conforms to guidelines and provides a clear argument using a logical structure that displays a fluent style, using appropriate tools that are correctly applied for the audience and discipline. |
Work based on a good understanding of appropriate knowledge of ruminant nutrition for Level 7. No significant omissions. Some evidence of knowledge derived from outside the teaching programme. |
Sound argument based on good analysis, evaluation of knowledge and concepts relating to the topic at Level 7. Good evidence of practical application will improve ruminant nutrition. |
Very good use of reliable, appropriate sources for Level 7, with some selected independently. References are complete and mainly comply with the Guide to Referencing, with minor omissions or errors. |
|
50-59 |
Presentation conforms to the guidelines with few errors. Accuracy and clarity of expression could be improved by minor changes to structure and/or style. Appropriate tools that are correctly applied for the audience or discipline. |
Work based on a good understanding of appropriate knowledge of ruminant nutrition for Level 7. No significant omissions. Limited to knowledge derived from the teaching programme. |
Work partly descriptive, but logical. An evaluation based on analysis and knowledge of basic concepts that relate to the chosen topic at Level 7. Some evidence of practical application that may assist in improving ruminant nutrition. |
Good use of reliable, appropriate sources for level 7, with some selected independently. References are complete and largely comply with the Guide to Referencing with minor omissions or recurring presentational errors. |
|
40-49 |
Presentation largely conform to guidelines, but has moderate errors. Accuracy and clarity of expression moderately compromised by poor structure and/or style. Tools largely appropriate but may be inconsistently applied for the audience or discipline. |
Work based on a superficial understanding of appropriate knowledge of ruminant nutrition for Level 7. Limited to knowledge derived from the teaching programme |
Work mainly descriptive, and a superficial argument based on limited analysis and evaluation of knowledge related to topic at Level 7. Limited evidence of a practical application that could improve ruminant nutrition. |
Some use of relevant sources for Level 7, but not sourced independently. References mostly complete and mainly comply with the Guide to Referencing, but significant omissions or recurring presentational errors. |
|
30-39 |
Presentation doesn’t conform to guidelines. Accuracy and clarity of expression severely compromised by poor structure and/or style. Tools inappropriate and/or incorrectly applied for the audience or discipline. |
Work based on an incomplete understanding of knowledge of ruminant nutrition for Level 7. |
Work descriptive, with little, irrelevant or illogical argument, based on limited understanding of knowledge of the topic at Level 7. Limited evidence of application that could improve ruminant nutrition. |
Little use of relevant sources for Level 7, but indiscriminately selected or largely unreliable or irrelevant; too much reliance on non-peer reviewed sources. Key reference information is largely present and understandable, but has significant presentation errors. |
|
20-29 |
Presentation doesn’t conform to guidelines. Illogical structure and/or immature and incoherent style. Tools inappropriate and/or incorrectly applied for the audience or discipline. |
Work based on a limited understanding of knowledge of ruminant nutrition, with significant errors or omissions |
Work descriptive with no argument and based on a basic understanding of knowledge of the chosen topic at Level 7. Limited evidence of application that is unlikely to improve ruminant nutrition. |
Minimal evidence of reading required for Level 7. Sources used are largely inappropriate or irrelevant to the task. References are mainly incomplete and confused. |
|
10-19 |
Limited grasp of communication skills. No structure and immature and incoherent style. Tools inappropriate and incorrectly applied for the audience or discipline. |
Work suggests limited awareness of knowledge of ruminant nutrition, but largely wrong, contradictory or unsupported. |
Work suggests some basic understanding of knowledge of the topic at Level 7, but largely wrong, contradictory or unsupported. No evidence of application that could improve ruminant nutrition. |
Very limited evidence of wider reading at level 7. No meaningful attempt at referencing. |
|
0-9 |
No evidence of academic conventions or the communication skills required at Level 7 |
No evidence of knowledge and understanding of ruminant nutrition. |
No evidence of knowledge and understanding of the chosen topic, or application that could improve ruminant nutrition. |
No evidence of reading. No attempt at referencing. |
Hire Experts To Solve This A7080 Individual Assignment Before Deadline
Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentUK assignment help is now available for A7080 Recent Advances in Ruminant Nutrition Individual Assignment! Struggling with your Assessment? We've got you covered. Our experts provide affordable assignment writing services, ensuring 100% human-written content – no AI. Get A+ guaranteed, with plagiarism-free content and on-time delivery. We provide free assignment samples. Enjoy affordable, high-quality services and stress-free learning as you receive top-notch assistance with your assignments. Let us help you excel in your course!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content