Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
---|---|---|---|
University | Coventry University | Module Title | 7008EXQ: Pollution Prevention & Control |
Assignment Title | CW |
Word Count (or equivalent) | 3000 words +/- 10% |
Assignment Type | Written |
There are two (2) parts to the coursework – a main essay on waste disposal, followed by a reflection on the exercises throughout the module. These must be submitted as one document via Turnitin on Aula. Be clear and specific, keeping it as short and concise as possible.
PART 1 (2500 words, 90% of module mark)
In a circular economy, waste would not be generated; however, we are far from reaching that goal. Currently, non-recycled municipal waste is mainly disposed of either in landfill sites or by incineration – both of these processes cause environmental impacts.
PART 2: Reflection on module exercises (500 words, 10% of module mark)
Submission arrangement online via Aula: Submission links are available on the Assessment page. Formatting of submission - this should be Microsoft Word and not a PDF.
Your assignment will be marked by the module team.
Provisional marks will be released once internally moderated.
Feedback will be provided by the module team alongside grades release.
Your provisional marks and feedback should be available within 2 weeks (10 working days).
Need Plagiarism free Answers for your college/ university Assignments
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentDetails of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief.
The Learning Outcomes for this module align with the marking criteria, which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
If you have any questions about this assignment, please see the Student Guidance on Coursework for more information.
You are expected to use effective, accurate, and appropriate language within this assessment task.
The work you submit must be your own, or in the case of group work, that of your group. All sources of information need to be acknowledged and attributed; therefore, you must provide references for all sources of information and acknowledge any tools used in the production of your work, including Artificial Intelligence (AI). We use detection software and make routine checks for evidence of academic misconduct.
Definitions of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and collusion, can be found on the Student Portal. All cases of suspected academic misconduct are referred for investigation, the outcomes of which can have profound consequences for your studies. For more information on academic integrity, please visit the Academic and Research Integrity section of the Student Portal.
If you have a disability, long-term health condition, specific learning difference, mental health diagnosis or symptoms and have discussed your support needs with health and wellbeing, you may be able to access support that will help with your studies.
If you feel you may benefit from additional support, but have not disclosed a disability to the University, or have disclosed but are yet to discuss your support needs, it is important to let us know so we can provide the right support for your circumstances. Visit the Student Portal to find out more.
The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you cannot submit your assessment by the deadline or sit a scheduled exam. If you think this might be the case, guidance on understanding what counts as an extenuating circumstance and how to apply is available on the Student Portal.
Assignment Category: Written
Attempt Type: Standard
Component Code: Cw
Hire Experts to solve this assignment Before your Deadline
Buy Today Contact Us
|
Pollution Source- Pathway-Receptor & Effects
Weighting: 30% |
Effectiveness of Pollution Control Measures
Weighting: 30% |
Waste Management Strategy
Weighting: 15% |
Reasoned Conclusion
Weighting: 15% |
Reflection
Weighting: 10% |
80 to 100% |
Exceptionally listed and |
Exceptionally listed and |
Exceptionally described the waste |
Exceptional conclusion with a |
Exceptional critical |
|
assessed the pathways, |
evaluated the effectiveness of |
management approach of a |
reasoned opinion clearly |
reflection on learning |
|
receptors, and effects of |
the pollution control measures |
named country supported by |
provided as to whether |
and development |
|
the relevant pollutants |
used to minimise the effects of |
relevant literature and proposed |
landfill sites or incineration is |
through the various |
|
from landfill sites and |
the most significant pollutants |
an appropriate and better waste |
the least damaging |
exercises carried out |
|
incineration disposal |
from landfill sites and |
management strategy for the |
environmental option and |
during this module. |
|
methods. Exceptionally |
incineration according to Best |
country, which is an improvement |
outstanding evaluation their |
Outstanding |
|
conducted an in-depth |
available techniques (BAT). |
supported by literature & case |
potential to contribute |
demonstration of |
|
analysis supported by |
Exceptionally evaluated |
studies of where it was |
towards a circular economy. |
how learning can |
|
literature & illustrations |
performance/ efficiency of |
implemented successfully. |
Exceptionally demonstrated |
improve |
|
with outstanding |
removal (%) of pollution control |
Outstanding in-depth analysis |
clear understanding of |
postgraduate skills |
|
structure. |
measures including considering |
including circular economy, |
characteristics of both waste |
and personal |
|
|
benefits and limitations, specific |
climate change, cost-benefit |
management options and |
development. |
|
|
location/country, etc. |
analysis considerations supported |
their environmental |
|
|
|
Outstanding structure and |
with relevant literature, |
scorecard. |
|
|
|
supported by literature & |
illustrations & structure. |
|
|
|
|
illustrations. |
|
|
|
70 to 79% |
Excellently listed and |
Excellently listed and evaluated |
Excellently described the waste |
Excellent conclusion with a |
Excellent critical |
|
assessed the pathways, |
the effectiveness of the pollution |
management approach of a |
reasoned opinion clearly |
reflection on learning |
|
receptors, and effects of |
control measures used to |
named country supported by |
provided as to whether |
and development |
|
the relevant pollutants |
minimise the effects of the most |
relevant literature and proposed |
landfill sites or incineration is |
through the various |
|
from landfill sites and |
significant pollutants from landfill |
an appropriate and better waste |
the least damaging |
exercises carried out |
|
incineration disposal |
sites and incineration according |
management strategy for the |
environmental option and |
during this module. |
|
methods. Excellently |
to Best available techniques |
country, which is an improvement |
excellent evaluation of their |
Excellent |
|
conducted an in-depth |
(BAT). Excellently evaluated |
supported by literature & case |
potential to contribute |
demonstration of |
|
analysis supported by |
performance/ efficiency of |
studies of where it was |
towards a circular economy. |
how learning can |
|
|
removal (%) of pollution control |
implemented successfully. |
Excellently demonstrated |
improve |
|
literature & illustrations with excellent structure. |
measures including considering benefits and limitations, specific location/country, etc. Excellent structure and supported by literature & illustrations |
Outstanding in-depth analysis including circular economy, climate change, cost-benefit analysis considerations supported with relevant literature, illustrations & structure. |
clear understanding of characteristics of both waste management options and their environmental scorecard. |
postgraduate skills and personal development. |
60 to 69% |
Listed and assessed |
Listed control measures and |
Described waste management |
Very good conclusion with a |
Very good critical |
|
pathways, receptors, |
evaluated effectiveness of the |
approach of a named country very |
reasoned opinion clearly |
reflection on learning |
|
and effects of the |
pollution control measures used |
well and supported work with |
provided as to whether |
and development |
|
relevant pollutants from |
to minimise the effects of the |
relevant literature. proposed an |
landfill sites or incineration is |
through the various |
|
landfill sites and |
most significant pollutants from |
appropriate and better waste |
the least damaging |
exercises carried out |
|
incineration disposal |
landfill sites and incineration |
management strategy for the |
environmental option and |
during this module. |
|
methods, but with few |
according to Best available |
country, which is an improvement |
very good evaluation of their |
Good demonstration |
|
errors and omissions. |
techniques (BAT), but with few |
supported by literature & case |
potential to contribute |
of how learning can |
|
Conducted in-depth |
omissions and errors. Evaluated |
studies of where it was |
towards a circular economy. |
improve |
|
analysis supported by |
performance/ efficiency of |
implemented successfully. |
Very well demonstrated clear |
postgraduate skills |
|
literature & illustrations |
removal (%) of pollution control |
Very good in-depth analysis |
understanding of |
and personal |
|
with very good structure. |
measures including considering |
including circular economy, |
characteristics of both waste |
development. |
|
|
benefits and limitations, specific |
climate change, cost-benefit |
management options and |
|
|
|
location/country, etc, but omitted |
analysis considerations supported |
their environmental |
|
|
|
few indicators. Very good |
with relevant literature, |
scorecard. |
|
|
|
structure and supported by |
illustrations & structure. |
|
|
|
|
literature & illustrations |
|
|
|
50 to 59% |
Listed and assessed |
Listed control measures and |
Described waste management |
Good conclusion with a |
Good critical |
|
pathways, receptors, |
evaluated effectiveness of the |
approach of a named country but |
reasoned opinion clearly |
reflection on learning |
|
and effects of the |
pollution control measures used |
with some omissions and errors |
provided as to whether |
and development |
|
relevant pollutants from |
to minimise the effects of the |
and supported work with some |
landfill sites or incineration is |
through the various |
|
landfill sites and |
most significant pollutants from |
relevant literature. Proposed an |
the least damaging |
exercises carried out |
|
incineration disposal |
landfill sites and incineration |
appropriate and better waste |
environmental option and |
during this module. |
|
methods, but with many |
according to Best available |
management strategy for the |
good evaluation of their |
Good demonstration |
|
errors and omissions. |
techniques (BAT), but with many |
country, which is an improvement |
potential to contribute |
of how learning can |
|
Conducted analysis |
omissions and errors. Evaluated |
supported by literature & case |
towards a circular economy. |
improve |
|
supported by some |
performance/ efficiency of |
studies of where it was |
Well demonstrated clear |
postgraduate skills |
|
literature & illustrations |
removal (%) of pollution control |
implemented successfully but |
understanding of |
and personal |
|
with good structure |
measures including considering |
lacks coherence in some areas. |
characteristics of both waste |
development. |
|
|
benefits and limitations, specific location/country, etc, but omitted many indicators. Good structure and supported by literature & illustrations |
Good in-depth analysis including circular economy, climate change, cost-benefit analysis considerations supported with some relevant literature, illustrations & structure. |
management options and their environmental scorecard. |
|
40 to 49% |
Listed and fairly |
Listed and fairly evaluated the |
Described some waste |
Fair conclusion with not |
Fair reflection on |
|
assessed or not |
effectiveness of the pollution |
management approaches of a |
clearly provided reasoned |
learning and |
|
assessed pathways, |
control measures used to |
named or unnamed country |
opinion as to whether landfill |
development through |
|
receptors, and effects of |
minimise the effects of the most |
supported by few relevant |
sites or incineration is the |
the few exercises |
|
the relevant pollutants |
significant pollutants from landfill |
literature and fair proposal of an |
least damaging |
carried out during |
|
from landfill sites and |
sites and incineration with some |
appropriate and better waste |
environmental option and fair |
this module. Fair |
|
incineration disposal |
according to Best available |
management strategy for the |
evaluation their potential to |
demonstration of |
|
methods, but with many |
techniques (BAT) with many |
country, but not well supported by |
contribute towards a circular |
how learning can |
|
omissions and errors. |
errors and omissions & lacks |
literature & case studies of where |
economy. Fairly |
improve |
|
Carried out some |
coherence in some areas. |
it was implemented successfully. |
demonstration of |
postgraduate skills |
|
analysis but supported |
Evaluated some performance/ |
Difficult to understand in some |
understanding of |
and personal |
|
by few literature & |
efficiency of removal (%) of |
areas due to lack of coherence. |
characteristics of both waste |
development. |
|
illustrations/no |
pollution control measures |
Some analysis including definition |
management options and |
|
|
illustrations with fair |
without any consideration of |
of circular economy, but no |
their environmental |
|
|
structure. Lacks |
either benefits and limitations, or |
consideration of other factors |
scorecard. |
|
|
coherence in some |
specific location/country, etc, |
supported with fair or no |
|
|
|
areas. |
Fair structure and supported by |
illustrations & fair structure. |
|
|
|
|
some literature & illustrations |
|
|
|
Fail |
Mentioned some |
Listed some control measures |
Listed some waste management |
Poor conclusion with not |
Poor reflection on |
30, 35% |
pathways, receptors, |
by not according to BAT and |
approaches of a named or |
clearly provided reasoned |
learning and |
|
and effects of the |
poorly evaluated the |
unnamed country supported by |
opinion as to whether landfill |
development through |
|
pollutants from landfill |
effectiveness of the pollution |
limited literature and no proposal |
sites or incineration is the |
the limited exercises |
|
sites and not |
control measures used to |
of an appropriate and better |
least damaging |
carried out during |
|
incineration disposal |
minimise the effects of the most |
waste management strategy for |
environmental option and fair |
this module. Poor |
|
methods or vice versa |
significant pollutants from landfill |
the country, no case studies of |
evaluation their potential to |
demonstration of |
|
but did not carry out an |
sites and incineration. Did not |
where it was implemented |
contribute towards a circular |
how learning can |
|
assessment or/analysis. |
evaluate any performance/ |
successfully. |
economy. Poor |
improve |
|
Provided limited |
efficiency of removal (%) of |
No analysis but just definition or |
demonstration of |
postgraduate skills |
|
literature & no |
pollution control measures. Did |
no definition of circular economy, |
understanding of |
|
|
illustrations with poor structure. Lacks coherence in many areas and difficult to understand |
not consider any benefits and limitations, or specific location/country, etc, Poor structure and not supported by any or limited literature & illustrations. |
no consideration of other factors supported with fair or no illustrations & poor structure. |
characteristics of both waste management options and their environmental scorecard. |
and personal development. |
Fail |
Mentioned no pathways, |
Listed minimal or no control |
Listed minimal or no waste |
Very poor conclusion with no |
Very poor reflection |
0 to 29% |
receptors, and effects of |
measures and not according to |
management approaches of a |
reasoned opinion as to |
on learning and |
|
the pollutants from |
BAT and very poorly evaluated |
named or unnamed country |
whether landfill sites or |
development through |
|
landfill sites and |
or no evaluation of the |
supported by minimal or no |
incineration is the least |
the minimal or no |
|
incineration disposal |
effectiveness of the pollution |
literature and no proposal of an |
damaging environmental |
exercises carried out |
|
methods and did not |
control measures used to |
appropriate and better waste |
option and fair evaluation |
during this module. |
|
carry out any |
minimise the effects of the most |
management strategy for the |
their potential to contribute |
Very poor |
|
assessment or analysis. |
significant pollutants from landfill |
country, no case studies of where |
towards a circular economy. |
demonstration of |
|
Provided minimal or no |
sites and incineration. Did not |
it was implemented successfully. |
Very poor demonstration of |
how learning can |
|
literature & no |
evaluate any performance/ |
No analysis but just definition or |
understanding of |
improve |
|
illustrations with very |
efficiency of removal (%) of |
no definition of circular economy, |
characteristics of both waste |
postgraduate skills |
|
poor structure. Lacks |
pollution control measures. Did |
no consideration of other factors |
management options and |
and personal |
|
coherence in all areas |
not consider any benefits and |
supported with no illustrations & |
their environmental |
development. |
|
and very difficult to |
limitations, or specific |
very poor structure. |
scorecard. |
|
|
understand. |
location/country, etc. Very poor |
|
|
|
|
|
structure and not supported by |
|
|
|
|
|
any or limited literature & |
|
|
|
|
|
illustrations. |
|
|
|
Have you faced any difficulties while writing your 7008EXQ Pollution Prevention and Control CW Assignment Brief? So now you don't need to think about it at all. Workingment assignment help is with you, which has been providing the best assignment writing services in the UK for years. There is a team of professional writers to write the assignments, which includes proofreaders, writers, and editors to make your work plagiarism-free and AI-free. We have given you some free assignment samples that will tell you about the quality of our writers' work.
If you want to see the solution to this brief, then click here: 7008EXQ Pollution Prevention and Control CW Assignment
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content