| Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Coventry University (CU) | Module Title | 6037BMS Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology |
| Word Count | 1500 words +/- 10% |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | CW2 |
This assessment is an interpretive essay for which you will be assigned a particular topic.
The topic is based on a widely researched area of immunological conditions and their clinical features. For your assigned topic, you need to include several relative causes of each condition that are discussed along with any tests or relevant results that are applicable to the pathophysiology of the given condition and the differential diagnosis. You are required to include an algorithm of the main disorders in order to classify different branches of the disease and reach a conclusive diagnosis. The algorithm should contain relevant differential diagnostic tests.
This is a time-constrained assessment ie you have TWO weeks in which to answer the question assigned to you. The module leader will post a spreadsheet in the Assessment section on Aula to indicate which case study you should answer – please do NOT attempt to answer a different case study, as you will receive zero marks. Details of the case studies will be uploaded to the Assessment section on Aula on Monday 17th June.
The question will assess your understanding of the immunological aspects of a specific disease state and your ability to interpret case studies. The module workshops will teach you how to approach different case studies and indicate the depth of information required in your coursework.
Your work should be informed by the learning you have experienced within the taught components of the module, but should be supplemented by reference to relevant published literature (contemporary text books and journal articles). Please do NOT cite lecture or workshop material in your essays. You are advised to use at least 15 suitable references in your work.
Your work will be subject to plagiarism checks through Turnitin so you are reminded that you should synthesise information from sources and express this in your own words in your answers.
The word limit for this assignment is 1500 words and you should state your word count at the end of your work.
The word count includes the following:
The following are excluded from your word allowance:
Your work should be submitted to the Resit or Deferral CW2 July 2024 (Resit/Deferral) Turnitin link on the module Aula page.
Please submit your work in a Microsoft Word format.
Academic staff will not be responsible for removing submissions that are made in error. Therefore, please take care in checking your submission before uploading to the final assessment submission link. You may submit multiple times to the final assessment link but do remember that obtaining a similarity report may take up to 24 hours and this should not be attempted close to the deadline. You may also utilise the draft link in the community pages for checking your similarity scores prior to the deadline.
The TurnitinUK system will record the date and time of your submission and cannot be over-written.
If you experience any technical problems when trying to submit your work, please consult Aula help via the question mark link. If these problems are experienced at the time of the submission deadline and cannot be quickly resolved, please capture screenshots as evidence and email these and your completed assessment to the module leader as soon as possible.
As this assessment is time-constrained, extensions to the deadline are NOT permitted.
The following Graduate Attributes will be developed by this assessment:
The module and assessment will develop your agile and critical thinking skills, your ability to make logical and well-thought-through decisions, based on scientific evidence, your ability to apply subject knowledge in a relevant context and to communicate effectively in a written format.
Your assignment will be marked by the module team.
How will I receive my grades and feedback?
Provisional marks will be released once internally moderated.
Feedback will be provided by the module team alongside grades release.
Feedback comments can be accessed by clicking on your submission in Turnitin and selecting the comments icon. The completed marks rubric can be accessed through the rubric icon.
Your provisional marks and feedback should be available within 2 weeks (10 working days).
What will I be marked against?
Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief.
Stuggling Your 6037BMS CW2 Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?
Hire Assignment Helper Now!The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
If you have any questions about this assignment please see the Student Guidance on Coursework for more information.
You are expected to use effective, accurate, and appropriate language within this assessment task.
The work you submit must be your own, or in the case of groupwork, that of your group. All sources of information need to be acknowledged and attributed; therefore, you must provide references for all sources of information and acknowledge any tools used in the production of your work, including Artificial Intelligence (AI). We use detection software and make routine checks for evidence of academic misconduct.
Definitions of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and collusion can be found on the Student Portal. All cases of suspected academic misconduct are referred for investigation, the outcomes of which can have profound consequences to your studies. For more information on academic integrity please visit the Academic and Research Integrity section of the Student Portal.
Support for Students with Disabilities or Additional Needs:
If you have a disability, long-term health condition, specific learning difference, mental health diagnosis or symptoms and have discussed your support needs with health and wellbeing you may be able to access support that will help with your studies.
If you feel you may benefit from additional support, but have not disclosed a disability to the University, or have disclosed but are yet to discuss your support needs it is important to let us know so we can provide the right support for your circumstances. Visit the Student Portal to find out more.
The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you cannot submit your assessment by the deadline or sit a scheduled exam. If you think this might be the case, guidance on understanding what counts as an extenuating circumstance, and how to apply is available on the Student Portal.
Attempt Type: Resit / Deferral
Component Code: Cw2
|
|
Introduction 5% |
Pathophysiology 25% |
Diagnosis 25% |
Summary 5% |
Algorithm 30% |
Referencing 10% |
|
82, 85,88, 90, 100 |
An outstanding background information on the disorder which is both detailed and clearly discussed. |
A complete and comprehensive overview of the areas concerned and the symptoms and causes of the disorders are identified. It considers all aspects of the topic and discussed in detail, not bullet points. It may include tables and images that are relevant all fully referenced and labelled correctly within the text. Subsections may be used. |
Provides an outstanding critical discussion of current laboratory methods identified where relevant with an overview of the method aims and how it meets the pathophysiological criteria for the classification of the disorders. |
Summary is logical and reflects student’s informed evaluation of the essay. Covers all key points presented in the essay. |
A comprehensive and very clearly organised flow diagram of the main disorders with relevant laboratory results in order to classify the different branches to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Relevant to the diagnostic strategies. Contents covered in algorithm are included within the text and vice versa. |
Extensive reference to contemporary peer-reviewed sources. All statements supported by literature. Citations and references formatted correctly.. |
|
72, 75,78 |
An excellent background information on the disorder, which is both detailed and clearly discussed. |
Excellent and comprehensive overview of the areas concerned and the symptoms and causes of the disorders are identified. Considers most aspects of the topic, matches most key points of the essay.
|
Provides excellent critical discussion of current laboratory methods identified where relevant with an overview of the method aims and how it meets the pathophysiological criteria for the classification of the disorders. |
Summary is logical and mostly shows student’s informed evaluation of the essay. Covers most of the key points presented in the essay. |
A excellent and clearly organised flow diagram of the main disorders with relevant laboratory results in order to classify the different branches to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Relevant to the diagnostic strategies. Almost all of the key contents covered in algorithm are included within the text and vice versa. |
Sources used are of an excellent standard and suitable evidence has been used to support arguments. Citations and references formatted correctly. |
|
62, 65, 68 |
A very good background information on the disorder. Detailed in most aspects, and clearly presented. |
Mostly complete and comprehensive overview of the areas concerned and the symptoms and causes of the disorders are identified. Considers most aspects of the topic, matches most key points of the essay. |
Provides very good critical discussion of current laboratory methods identified where relevant with an overview of the method aims and how it meets the pathophysiological criteria for the classification of the disorders. |
Summary is logical and shows some evidence of evaluation. Key findings of the essay are identified clearly, but irrelevant or overly basic information may be included. |
Well organised flow diagram of the main disorders with mostly relevant laboratory results in order to classify the different branches to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Mainly relevant to the diagnostic strategies. Most contents covered in algorithm are included within the text and vice versa. |
Most of the narrative is supported by suitable peer-reviewed references. Citations and references are generally correctly formatted |
|
52, 55, 58 |
A good background information on the disorder. Covers most aspects of the topic. Although contains irrelevant, inappropriate or overly basic detail. |
A good overview of the areas concerned and the symptoms and causes of the disorders to be identified. Covers some aspects of the topic. Provides some key points of the essay along with some irrelevant or inappropriate information. |
Some critical evaluation of some of the current laboratory methods identified where relevant with an overview of the method aims and how it meets the pathophysiological criteria for the classification of the disorders. |
A reasonable summary; some findings are identified clearly but may be lacking in detail or accuracy. |
Generally, a clear and organised flow diagram of the main disorders with some relevant laboratory results in order to classify the different branches to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Somehow relevant to the diagnostic strategies. Some contents covered in algorithm are included within the text and vice versa. |
Narrative requires supportive evidence in places. Suitable sources have been used but not all the appropriate information has been extracted. Some errors in formatting of citations/references. |
|
42, 45, 48 |
An acceptable background information on the disorder containing some key points. It shows some awareness of the topic but lacks detail and accuracy in various aspects and there are several omissions or errors in key facts |
An acceptable overview of the areas concerned and the symptoms and causes of the disorders are identified. Demonstrates awareness to a good standard. It shows some acceptable awareness of the topic dealing with some complex issues. |
Some evidence of some of the current laboratory methods identified where relevant with an overview of the method aims and how it meets the pathophysiological criteria for the classification of the disorders. |
Summary is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed in the essay; related findings are oversimplified or inaccurately reported. May show significant paraphrasing of the essay. |
Reasonably organised flow diagram of the main disorders with few relevant laboratory results in order to classify the different branches to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Some points are relevant to the diagnostic strategies. Few contents covered in algorithm are included within the text and vice versa. |
Limited use of evidence to support the narrative. May rely on inappropriate sources e.g. old references or not peer-reviewed. Errors in formatting of citations or references |
|
30, 35% |
Limited background information on the disorder. Limited awareness of the topic. The essay lacks detail and accuracy in various aspects. Explanations lack scientific detail or clarity. |
Inadequate overview of the areas concerned and the symptoms and causes of the disorders are identified. Information may be taken only from lecture notes and teaching material |
Limited evidence of some of the current laboratory methods identified where relevant with an overview of the method aims and how it meets the pathophysiological criteria for the classification of the disorders. |
Summary is too brief or irrelevantly to the information discussed in the essay; related findings are inaccurately reported. |
Limited structure and coherence to the flow diagram of the main disorders. Algorithm limited differential diagnostic laboratory tests. Little relevance to the diagnostic strategies. Little contents covered in algorithm are not included within the text and vice versa. |
Little or no reference to data from literature. Sources are mostly inappropriate for this level of study. Citations/references missing or incorrectly formatte |
|
0-29% |
Little or no attempt to answer the essay posed. Little information of any relevance to the disorder. |
Little or no attempt on overview of the areas concerned and the symptoms and causes of the disorders to be identified. Little or no relevant information presented relating to the topic of the essay. |
Collection of jumbled information with no reasonable attempt to justify or validate its inclusion. No relevant laboratory methods provided. |
Summary is missing or fails to properly summarise the findings of the essay being reviewed. Findings are inaccurate. |
Little to no structure and coherence to the flow diagram of the main disorders. Algorithm contains little or irrelevant differential diagnostic laboratory tests. Not relevant to the diagnostic strategies. Contents covered in algorithm are not included within the text and vice versa. |
No reference to data from the literature. Citations and references are missing. |
Order Custom Answers for 6037BMS CW2 Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you stuck on 6037BMS Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology Coursework 2 Assignment? So now you can be stress free as you have reached the right place and here our expert team is providing you Science Assignment Help services. Look no further, we are available 24/7 to help you, so now be stress free and focus on studies. If you want solutions then we also provide Coventry University Assignment Samples that will help you clear your concepts. Contact us today and increase your academic grades with online assignment help!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
