| Category | Assignment | Subject | Marketing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Coventry University (CU) | Module Title | 6027MKT Corporate Marketing Strategy |

This is an individual assignment.
The assignment requires you to design and produce a presentation on Homebase. You are required to develop a marketing strategy for Homebase, which should include:
For the strategies used above, you will need to justify the application by clearly explaining how each strategy aligns with Homebase’s current market position, resources, and long-term objectives, and by demonstrating its feasibility through relevant theories, industry evidence, and realistic consideration of risks and implementation challenges.
This assessment is categorised as AMBER for the use of AI.
You may use AI for the following only:
All presentation materials (all slides and supporting materials) must be uploaded to AULA Turnitin by 18:00 on 24/11/2025 UK time. You can access the Turnitin submission link through the Aula page.
| Tool | How used in this assignment |
| e.g. ChatGPT-3.5 | Suggestions of topics |
| e.g. Microsoft Copilot | Consolidating notes |
| Etc. |
Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites
Struggling with your 6027MKT CW2 Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?
Request to Buy AnswerHow will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked by the module team.
How will I receive my grades and feedback?
Provisional marks will be released once internally moderated.
Feedback will be provided by the module team alongside the grades release.
Your provisional marks and feedback should be available within 3 weeks (15 working days).
What will I be marked against?
Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief.
If you have any questions about this assignment please see the Student Guidance on Coursework for more information.
Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar:
You are expected to use effective, accurate, and appropriate language within this assessment task.
The work you submit must be your own, or in the case of groupwork, that of your group. All sources of information need to be acknowledged and attributed; therefore, you must provide references for all sources of information and acknowledge any tools used in the production of your work. We use detection software and make routine checks for evidence of academic misconduct.
It is your responsibility to keep a record of how your thinking has developed as you progress through to submission. Appropriate evidence could include: version controlled documents, developmental sketchbooks, or journals. This evidence can be called upon if we suspect academic misconduct.
If using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the development of your assignment, you must reference which tools you have used and for what purposes you have used them. This information must be acknowledged in your final submission.
Definitions of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and collusion can be found on the Student Portal. All cases of suspected academic misconduct are referred for investigation, the outcomes of which can have profound consequences to your studies. For more information on academic integrity please visit the Academic and Research Integrity section of the Student Portal.
Support for Students with Disabilities or Additional Needs:
If you have a disability, long-term health condition, specific learning difference, mental health diagnosis or symptoms and have discussed your support needs with health and wellbeing you may be able to access support that will help with your studies.
If you feel you may benefit from additional support, but have not disclosed a disability to the University, or have disclosed but are yet to discuss your support needs it is important to let us know so we can provide the right support for your circumstances. Visit the Student Portal to find out more.
The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you cannot submit your assessment by the deadline or sit a scheduled exam. If you think this might be the case, guidance on understanding what counts as an extenuating circumstance, and how to apply is available on the Student Portal.
Assignment Category: Individual Presentation
Attempt Type: Standard
Component Code: CW2
|
|
Theory, concepts and models |
Analysis, evaluation and application |
Critique, conclusions and recommendations |
|
80 to 100% |
Exceptional and insightful use of relevant corporate marketing and strategic management theories. Integrates models with creativity and precision, showing outstanding breadth and depth of reading and critical interpretation. All theory is accurately applied |
Exceptional analysis that moves beyond description to provide compelling, evidence-driven insights. Applies concepts directly to market positioning, evaluating multiple perspectives and justifying ideas with strong industry evidence |
Exceptional critique that anticipates potential obstacles and responds with creative, practical solutions. Conclusions are convincing, logically structured, and rooted in evidence. Recommendations are bold yet realistic, showing clear awareness. |
|
70 to 79% |
Excellent range of relevant theories and models applied accurately and consistently. Shows strong understanding and ability to connect theory to situation, with only minor gaps in depth. |
Excellent, well-reasoned analysis linking ideas directly to the strategic challenges. Considers pros and cons with solid justification. Applies evidence effectively to support proposals. |
Excellent critique and conclusions. Recommendations are insightful, feasible, and well aligned to the company’s needs, with clear links to the analysis. |
|
60 to 69% |
Very good selection of theories and models with mostly accurate application. Some minor gaps in depth or breadth of reading. Clear effort to link theory to the case |
Very good analysis that is logical and relevant. Some evaluation present, though not all points are equally developed or supported with evidence. |
Very good conclusions and recommendations. Mostly realistic and connected to the findings, though some lack detail or forward planning. |
|
50 to 59% |
Good range of theories used, though some may be applied superficially or lack clear relevance to current challenges. |
Good analysis with relevant points, though may rely on description or general statements. Limited evaluation or industry evidence. |
Good conclusions with some useful recommendations, though they may be generic, lack prioritisation, or not fully linked to the analysis. |
|
40 to 49% |
Outcomes met but application is limited or contains errors. Minimal evidence of wider reading. |
Outcomes met. Meets basic requirements but is descriptive in places. Limited or inconsistent application to context. |
Outcomes met. Basic conclusions and recommendations. Ideas lack detail, realism, or a clear link to the analysis. |
|
Fail 30- 39% |
Outcomes not met. Limited or inaccurate use of theories and models. Little connection between theory and the task. |
Outcomes not met. Limited, weak analysis with little or no evaluation. Points are vague and unsupported by evidence. |
Outcomes not met. Limited, weak, or missing conclusions. Recommendations are unclear, unrealistic, or absent. |
|
Fail |
Outcomes not met. Minimal or no use of relevant theory. No meaningful attempt to connect concepts to the task. |
Outcomes not met. Minimal or no meaningful analysis or evaluation. Lacks relevance to situation. |
Outcomes not met. Minimal or no conclusions or recommendations |
Hire Experts To Solve This 6027MKT CW2 Assignment Before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you a Coventry Students and searching the solution of 6027MKT Corporate Marketing Strategy Assignment? Look no further! There are specialized professionals for all categories of assignments who offer you plagiarism-free and superior content. You are assured that our Coventry University Assignment Help service will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. A free list of Coventry University assignment samples written by PhD experts is also provided here that can help you boost your study power and check the quality of the assignment. So contact us today and get your top-notch assignment!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content