| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Coventry University | Module Title | 6010MAA Individual Project Introduction |
| Word Count | 1500 words in length (±10%) |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | CW2 |
| Assessment Title | Progress Report |
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |
The primary purpose of a dissertation is to train the student in the process of scholarly research and writing under the direction of a supervisor. After the student has graduated and the work is published, it serves as a contribution to human knowledge, useful to other scholars and perhaps even to a more general audience.
Your main task is to produce a Progress Report. The Progress Report should summarise the progress to date on the project, and produce a plan for the practical aspects of the project going into the future. If any changes to the original Aim and/or Objectives have been made, this should be included in the Progress Report along with justification as to why the Aim and/or Objectives were changed. This change should only occur after consultation with the supervisor.
The report should be a maximum 1500 words in length (±10%), excluding front matter, diagrams, designs, datasheets, appendices etc.
Briefly mention the project’s Aim and Objectives, highlighting the need/purpose of the project, to set the scene for the reader. If the Aim and Objectives have been changed, please justify.
This section should demonstrate the progress which has been made since the start of the project. The research carried out for the literature review should not be included. This was already covered in CW1: Preliminary Report.
To evidence the progress made, this section could include:
A written plan of how the work done so far will be used to complete the remainder of the project. This should include the anticipated practical attainments, results and outputs from completing your project, and the impact they could have e.g. economic, social and environmental issues. References to Gantt chart should be included. The purpose of this section is to demonstrate that the student is in full control of their project and knows what needs done and, more importantly, when. The future plan will also provide an overview if the project is progressing as planned or not.
This section should also include a detailed Gantt chart. A Gantt chart should be created at the start of the project and regularly updated. The student should demonstrate that they are in control of the project by indicating how the Gantt chart has evolved over the course of the project.
The Gantt chart should highlight, in timely manner, how the work for the project has been carried out so far. It should also include the time spent and the work done for the submission of CW1. The Gantt chart should include key milestones and critical aspects on the project timeline. The student should also add details of assignment hand-in dates for other modules to demonstrate how effectively, or otherwise, the time will be managed. Give dates of meetings with your supervisor (and those planned in the future).
It is imperative to bear in mind that a Gantt chart should not merely serve as a retrospective record of accomplished tasks. It is also a comprehensive plan devised by the researcher for the successful execution of the remaining phases of the project during Semester 2. By encompassing both retrospective and prospective aspects, this Gantt chart not only captures the project's historical progress but also acts as a strategic roadmap, guiding the researcher in achieving the project's objectives promptly and efficiently. This holistic approach to Gantt charting ensures that the project maintains its trajectory towards successful completion and adherence to established timelines.
This section is to supplement the information provided in main body of the report. This should include ALL of the following.
However, additional documentation, as per the project, could also be included the appendices.
Buy Answer of 6010MAA CW2 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Request to Buy AnswerAs part of this module, you are required to submit an online ethics application and to obtain ethical approval for the research project that you are proposing to undertake. At Coventry University, formal ethical approval must be obtained before any data is collected for a research project. You must download and append a Certificate of Ethical Approval to your CW2 submission when you formally submit it on Aula. This is to confirm that ethical approval has been obtained for your project.
Failure to submit your ethics application and to gain appropriate ethical approval for the research you will undertake by the relevant deadlines (and before any data is collected) may result in disciplinary action and will be subject to the Ethics Misconduct process which is outlined in the General Regulations, Appendix 1. Penalties can include zero for your work and possible exclusion from the University for Non-compliance with the ethics process.
Students with missing Ethics Approval Certificate will NOT be allowed to progress with the project.
|
Progress to date |
60% |
|
Future work |
30% |
|
Formatting of Report References |
10% |
The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task.
The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
|
Class |
Mark |
Progress To Date (60%) |
Future Work (30%) |
Introduction, Formatting of Report and References (10%) |
|
First |
80 – 100 |
An outstanding progress made exceeding all the requirements and expectations. |
Of a publishable standard. The progress review exceeds the required standards of an UG dissertation. Outstanding in all respects. The student is expected to exceed the requirements with minimal supervision and is expected to deliver the project on time. |
Formatted according to a journal publication. The report is coherent, succinct and easy to read. |
|
70 – 79
|
An excellent progress made. Comprehensive understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology is demonstrated. Evidence of independent and critical thought is shown in student’s work through detailed model/process development (CAD/physical). A fully functioning artefact has been demonstrated to the supervisor. This could be typically achieved with a fully functioning prototype, fully meshed CFD/FEA simulation with preliminary analysis, or ethically approved questionnaire with preliminary analysis and results. Contains a detailed Gantt chart showing the key milestones, along with external commitments. The student has attended at least 90% of the weekly meetings/communications, and has shown an excellent level of self-motivation and initiative. |
An excellent written plan of the future work is shown, making reference to the Gantt chart. The Gantt chart showing the future work is thorough, containing key milestones, along with external commitments. Anticipated attainments, along with the impact are discussed in detail, including contingencies. The student is expected to meet the requirements with minimal supervision and is expected to deliver the project on time. |
References are all according to APA. Professionally formatted with no grammatical errors. The report is coherent and easy to read. |
|
|
Upper Second |
60 – 69 |
A very good/good progress made. Contains a high degree of understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology. Evidence of a good degree of independent and critical thought is shown in student’s work through model/process development (CAD/physical). A functioning artefact has been demonstrated to the supervisor that requires limited work. This could be typically achieved with a functioning prototype, meshed CFD/FEA simulation with preliminary analysis, or ethically approved questionnaire with preliminary analysis and results. Contains a detailed Gantt chart showing the key milestones. The student has attended at least 80% of the weekly meetings/communications. |
A very good/good written plan of the future work shown, making reference to the Gantt chart. The Gantt chart showing the future work is very good/good, containing key milestones. Anticipated attainments, along with the impact are appropriately mentioned. The student seems to meet the expected requirements and deliver the project on time. |
References are correct and formatted mostly according to APA. Well-organised, clearly written and expressed. A well formatted and structured reports with only a few grammatical errors. The report is coherent. |
|
Lower Second |
50 – 59 |
Reasonable progress made. Contains some degree of understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology. Some independent and/or critical thought is shown in student’s work through model/process development (CAD/physical). A functioning artefact has been demonstrated to the supervisor that requires a lot of work. This could be typically achieved with a prototype, meshed CFD/FEA simulation with preliminary analysis, or ethically approved questionnaire with preliminary analysis and results. Contains a reasonable Gantt chart showing most of the key milestones. The student has attended at least 60% of the weekly meetings/communications. |
A reasonable written plan of the future work is shown. The Gantt chart showing the future work is reasonable, containing key milestones. Anticipated attainments, along with the impact are briefly mentioned. The student needs to put in more effort in order to meet the expected requirements and deliver the project on time. |
References are mostly correct, but not formatted according to APA. The structure and expression lacks clarity. It is not well-structured or clearly expressed. Contains more than a few grammatical errors. The report is easy to read. |
|
Third |
40 – 49 |
Some progress made. Contains a limited degree of understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology. An extremely limited functioning artefact has been demonstrated to the supervisor. A basic Gantt chart is shown. The student has attended at least 50% of the weekly meetings/communications. |
A minimal written plan of the future work is shown. The Gantt chart showing the future work is basic. Anticipated attainments, along with the impact are barely mentioned. The student needs to put in a lot more effort in order to meet the expected requirements and deliver the project on time. |
Poorly structured and poorly expressed. Few and/or poorly presented references. Incorrect use of grammar made it very difficult to read. |
|
Marginal |
35 – 39 |
Minimal progress made. The student has not demonstrated an acceptable/expected level of understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology. No functioning artefact has been provided. Gantt chart hardly shows anything. The student has attended less than 50% of the weekly meetings/communications. |
The quality of the written plan of the future work shown is very poor. No/inappropriate Gantt chart shown. Anticipated attainments, along with the impact are not mentioned. The supervisor has doubts about the student meeting the expected requirements and about an on time delivery of the project. |
Poor presentation of references. The structure of the report is not coherent. It contains a lot of grammatical mistakes. |
|
Fail |
0 – 34 |
Limited/no progress made. No understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology is demonstrated. No artefact has been provided. Gantt chart does not conform to the requirements. The student has attended less than 50% of the weekly meetings/communications. |
Limited/no future plan shown. No/unreadable Gantt chart shown. Anticipated attainments, along with the impact are not mentioned. The student will not meet the expected requirements in order to deliver the project on time. |
Poorly structured and poorly expressed/presented. Poor/lack of references. The report is not coherent. The inconsistent and incorrect use of grammar throughout the report shows that the student is not competent in English writing. |
|
Late |
0 |
Late submission. |
Late submission. |
Late submission. |
|
Academic/Ethics misconduct |
0 |
Possible penalty after academic/ethics misconduct such as plagiarism, etc. and/or missing ethics approval. |
Possible penalty after academic/ethics misconduct such as plagiarism, etc. and/or missing ethics approval. |
Possible penalty after academic/ethics misconduct such as plagiarism, etc. and/or missing ethics approval. |
Stuck Your 6010MAA CW2 Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?
Hire Assignment Helper Now!UK assignment help is now available for 6010MAA Individual Project Introduction CW2 Assignment! Struggling with your Assessment? We've got you covered. Our experts provide affordable University Of Coventry Assignment Help, ensuring 100% human-written content – no AI. Get A+ guaranteed, with plagiarism-free content and on-time delivery. We provide free Coventry University Assignment Samples. Enjoy affordable, high-quality services and stress-free learning as you receive top-notch assistance with your assignments. Let us help you excel in your course!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
