517HSC An Introduction to Healthy Development CW1 Assessment Brief | CU

Mark band

Outcome

Guidelines

80-100%

1st

Meets learning outcomes

1st - Exceptional timeline that shows a very high degree of understanding about the concept of childhood. The timeline is extremely critical and analytical.

There is evidence of exceptional research well beyond the minimum recommended using a range of methodologies, that are up to date and relevant. These sources include a wide range of journal articles, government reports, policy and data. There is clear evidence of research about the historical changes to childhood and differences due to culture and place and interpretation of this data that shows exceptional understanding and synthesis. Referencing is accurate.

There are exceptional comparisons of childhood that demonstrate creative flair, a high degree of originality and autonomy.

The timeline is produced to a very high standard with a very high degree of accuracy and proficiency. This leads to exceptional communication of the information and significant evidence of professional skill set. The timeline is exceptionally well produced, showcasing an exceptional proficiency with the English language.

70-79%

1st

1st - Excellent timeline that shows a very high degree of understanding about the concept of childhood. The timeline is very critical and analytical.

There is evidence of excellent research beyond the minimum recommended using a range of methodologies, that are up to date and relevant. These sources include a range of journal articles, government reports, policy and data. There is clear evidence of research about the historical changes to childhood and differences due to culture and place and interpretation of this data that shows excellent understanding and synthesis. Referencing is accurate.

There are excellent comparisons of childhood that demonstrate creative flair, a high degree of originality and autonomy.

The timeline is produced to a high standard with a high degree of accuracy and proficiency. This leads to excellent communication of the information and significant evidence of a professional skill set. The timeline is very well produced, showcasing an exceptional proficiency with the English language.

60-69%

2:1

2:1 – A very good timeline that shows a very good degree of understanding about the concept of childhood. The timeline is critical and analytical.

 There is evidence of very good research that may go beyond the minimum recommended using a range of methodologies, that are up to date and relevant. These sources may include journal articles, government reports, policy and data. There is evidence of research about the historical changes to childhood and differences due to culture and place and interpretation of this data that shows a very good understanding and an attempt at synthesis. Referencing is mostly accurate.

There are very good comparisons of childhood that demonstrate some creative flair, a degree of originality and autonomy.

The timeline is produced to a very good standard with a very good degree of accuracy and proficiency. This leads to very good communication of the information and evidence of a professional skill set. The timeline is produced well, showcasing a very good proficiency with the English language, any errors are minor and do not impact on coherence.

50-59%

2:2

2:2 - A good timeline that shows a good degree of understanding about the concept of childhood. The timeline has some limited evidence of criticality.

There is evidence of research that may go beyond minimum recommended but does not use a wide range of methodologies, sources may not be up to date and relevant. These sources may include government reports, policy and data. There is some evidence of research about the historical changes to childhood and differences due to culture and place and interpretation of this data that shows a somewhat limited understanding. Referencing is attempted with some inaccuracy.

There are good comparisons of childhood that demonstrate some limited degree of originality and autonomy.

The timeline is produced to a good standard with some degree of accuracy and proficiency. The timeline is produced to a good standard with some evidence of proficiency with the English language, any errors are minor and do not impact on coherence too much.

40-49%

3rd Class

3rd - Meet the learning outcomes with a basic understanding of the topic.

A basic timeline that shows a limited understanding about the concept of childhood. The timeline lacks criticality.

There is limited evidence of research that may go beyond the minimum recommended. There is a small range of sources used or they may not be up to date and relevant. These sources may not include government reports, policy and data.

There is some limited evidence of research about the historical changes to childhood and differences due to culture and place, and there is limited interpretation of this data. Referencing is attempted with significant inaccuracy.

There are basic comparisons of childhood. The timeline is produced to a basic standard but may have some errors in structure or academic style. The timeline is written with a basic level of proficiency in the English language and has several errors which at times may impact on the coherence of the report.

30-39%

Fail

Fails to achieve learning outcomes

Fail – Outcomes not met.

A basic timeline that shows a limited or inaccurate understanding of the concept of childhood. Sections of the timeline may be missing or incorrect.

There is very little evidence of research. Sources used lack credibility. Referencing is absent or seriously flawed. The information used has not been paraphrased. The timeline lacks any use of data. There is little understanding of the concept of childhood, the historical development of childhood and differences in childhood due to culture and place.

There are serious issues with the style of the timeline, and there are serious errors in the use of English language.

0-29%

 Fail

Fail – Outcomes not met. The timeline is incomplete or seriously flawed. No evidence of credible research or attempts at referencing.

Timeline is poorly created and has serious errors in the use of academic writing style and/or English language.