| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Coventry University (CU) | Module Title | 4000HRM Organisational Behaviour |
| Word Count | 2000 words +/- 10% |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Report |
| Assessment Title | CW2 FIRST SIT– Case Study Analysis (S1 2025) |
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |
This is an individual assignment.
This assignment requires you to read the case study: “Axis and Allies Marketing” in the separate PDF document. The document will be found in the Aula page/ Materials/ Assessment.
Write a 2000-word report drawing on appropriate organisational behaviour theory and people management practices which addresses the following issues:
Plan of Case Study Analysis (and word count guidance)
The use of academic journal articles is a key feature of academic research and practice. The aim of this assignment is to provide leaners with the opportunity to consult academic and other professional journals and then apply this knowledge to events in the business environment (case study).
Are You Looking The Solution of 4000HRM CW2 Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentThe assessment must be submitted by 18:00 on 04/12/2025. No paper copies are required.
In undertaking this module and assessment, students will develop the following Graduate Attributes:
The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
On completion of the module the student should be able to:
|
|
Theory, Concepts and Models |
Analysis, Evaluation and Application |
Critiques, Conclusions and Recommendations |
|
80 to 100% |
Exceptional evidence of wider reading and extensive use of sources examined critically and logically |
Exceptional critical analysis and discussion well-grounded in a wide range of literature, demonstrating exceptional depth and breadth of the subject. |
Exceptional critical summary of the presented argument and where relevant, well-founded recommendations made. |
|
|
|
Shows outstanding depth and breaths of understanding and analysing the case study. |
|
|
70 to 79% |
Excellent evidence of reading on relevant material beyond those given in teaching sessions or exercises. Refers extensively to sources. Evaluates literature logically and critically. |
Excellent critical analysis and strong discussion well-grounded in literature. Shows both depth and breadth of understanding of the topic(s) from the case study. |
Excellent critical summary of the presented argument. Provides realistic and insightful recommendations. |
|
60 to 69% |
Very good evidence of accessing and reading on relevant material. Refers to adequate sources. Analyses literature clearly and critically. |
Very good and well- reasoned arguments shown in analysis and discussion based on literature. Presents appropriate understanding of the topic(s) from the case study, |
Very good critical summary of the presented argument. Provides logical recommendations. |
|
50 to 59% |
Good understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues demonstrated. Refers to some sources. Discusses literature thoroughly with some critical analysis. |
Good logical and clear arguments shown in analysis and discussion based on literature.
Demonstrates clear understanding of the topic(s) from the case study. |
Good summary of the arguments presented.
Provides some recommendations which are logical. |
|
40 to 49% |
Outcomes met and presents some understanding of theories, concepts and issues. Refers to a few sources. Describes literature with limited critical analysis. |
Outcomes met and demonstrates some arguments in analysis and discussion based on literature. Shows basic understanding of the topic(s) from the case study. |
Outcomes met and arguments briefly summarised. Provides a few recommendations. |
|
Fail 30 to 35% |
Outcomes not met. Limited or no understanding of relevant literature. Refers to limited or no sources. Describes literature with no critical analysis. |
Outcomes not met. Limited and invalid analysis and discussion based on anecdotes and generalisation. Presents limited or no understanding of the topic(s). |
Outcomes not met. Limited or no summary of the assignment. Presents limited or no recommendation. |
|
Fail 0 to 29% |
Outcomes not met. Minimal or no evidence of understanding of relevant literature; reference to sources or literature. |
Outcomes not met. Minimal or no understanding of analysis or discussion in relation to the topic(s). |
Outcomes not met. Minimal or no evidence of any conclusions or recommendations. |
Buy Answer of 4000HRM CW2 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentUK assignment help is now available for 4000HRM Organisational Behaviour CW2 Assignment! Struggling with your Assessment? We've got you covered. Our experts provide affordable HRM Assignment Help, ensuring 100% human-written content – no AI. Get A+ guaranteed, with plagiarism-free content and on-time delivery. We provide free coventry university assignment samples. Enjoy affordable, high-quality services and stress-free learning as you receive top-notch assistance with your assignments. Let us help you excel in your course!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content