| Category | Assignment | Subject | Finance |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Nottingham Trent University (NTU) | Module Title | PRMD30022 Investment Appraisal & Valuation |
| Word Count | 3000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Coursework 1, Investment Appraisal Report |
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |
| Module Code and Title | PRMD30022, Investment Appraisal and Valuation |
| Level of study (4, 5, or 6) | 6 |
| Coursework Number, type and Title | 1, Investment Appraisal Report |
| Is this group work? | No |
| Coursework weighting within element | 100 |
| Coursework Brief Author | Dr Bismark Aha |
| Date Issued to Students | 6/10/2025 |
| Work to be submitted before | 16/01/2026 |
| Submit to | Module Learning Room Dropbox |
| Feedback date (15 working days after submission) | 6th February 2026 |
| Maximum Word Limit | 3,000 words. This excludes diagrams, tables, charts, figures, appendices, references, and the Excel financial model. |
| Link to the Module Specification | The Module Specification can be found in the Module Information folder on the NOW learning room for PRMD30022 |
The table below gives details of the module learning outcomes that will be assessed by this coursework.
|
Module Learning Outcomes Assessed |
Knowledge and Understanding These are the learning outcomes detailed in the module specification: • Explain, evaluate and apply the principles and techniques of investment performance measurement and analysis, including measurement and analysis of income, capital and total return and investment risk, at the individual asset and portfolio levels. • Produce and interpret investment appraisals that reflect the use of debt as a source of finance and the potential risks and benefits of financial structures and drawing on related financial theory. • Undertake valuation and appraisal of real estate developments and investments, and offer interpretation and advice in relation to investment and market value and the viability of investments; make an informed contribution to investment decision making. • Critically evaluate key principles of sustainability and apply them to real-world scenarios within this subject area, demonstrating an understanding of environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability in a property context. |
|
|
Skills, Qualities and Attributes These are the five learning outcomes detailed in the module specification: • Act independently in planning, organising and directing your personal academic and professional development. • Collect and integrate information and data from a variety of sources, analyse, evaluate and interpret information and issues in a systematic and critical manner, and evaluate alternative processes/measures against relevant criteria; make logical recommendations based on analysis of the information and circumstances. • Identify and solve problems; devise appropriate solutions to suit circumstances. • Communicate information, ideas and concepts effectively in a clear, articulate fashion, utilising information technology and aids where appropriate. • Utilise personal and interpersonal skills and competencies, and work constructively and co- operatively with others, applying ethical and professional values to situations encountered |
You are an Investment Analyst working for a prominent UK Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT). Your firm is actively seeking to expand its portfolio by acquiring high-quality commercial assets that align with its strategic objectives. Your director has identified 91 Goswell Road, a freehold multi-let office located in Clerkenwell/Farringdon, London as a potential acquisition target:
PLEASE REFER TO THE PROPERTY INFORMATION PACK FOR DETAILED ACCOMODATION AND TENANCY SCHEDULES.
Supplementary Property Information
The following schedule sets out mandatory baseline inputs for annual operating costs for subject property and must be used in conjunction with the data in the property information pack. Assume these costs are non-recoverable from tenants and model these in your DCF.
|
|
Cost Item |
Projected Cost |
Notes (Basis of Assumption) |
|
|
|
Management fee |
5 % of Effective Rental Income (ERI) |
Covers letting management, rent collection, accounting, and oversight. |
|
|
|
Building insurance |
£0.75 per sq ft per annum |
Rate for comparable office properties. |
|
|
|
Other non-recoverable expenses |
2.5 % of Potential Gross Income (PGI) |
Day-to-day maintenance of common areas, plant, and minor repairs. |
|
Important note: The provided details have been adapted for this coursework and should be considered correct for this purpose.
In addition, the following capital expenditure items are scheduled to be undertaken:
Need Expert Help for Your PRMD30022 Investment Appraisal & Valuation CW1 Assignment?
Request to Buy AnswerYour primary task is to conduct a comprehensive analysis that combines both a valuation of the asset's worth to the client and an appraisal of the deal's financial viability at the vendor's asking price. You must produce both a formal report and a detailed financial model that advises the REIT's investment committee on the financial viability of the proposed acquisition.
The Property Information Pack states that "Offers are invited in excess of £12,500,000". Your analysis must therefore follow two-stage process:
1.Determine the Investment Value (IV): Use your 10-year DCF model to calculate your own independent assessment of the property's Investment Value for the REIT. This figure represents the absolute maximum price the REIT should be willing to pay based on your justified assumptions and their target return.
2.Appraise the Deal at the Asking Price: Using £12,500,000 as the acquisition price, you must calculate the key performance metrics (e.g. NPV and IRR) to test the financial viability of the investment at this specific price point.
Your report must be professionally prepared. Therefore, you should have regard to the ethical and professional principles within the RICS Valuation – Global Standards (the 'Red Book') and the best- practice guidance in the RICS publication, Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Valuations (Practice Information, 2023). Your work should demonstrate a clear understanding of the principles set out in this document, particularly concerning the justification of your DCF inputs.
Your analysis must be based on a detailed, dynamic and fully functional 10-year Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model built in Microsoft Excel. The core of your work is to advise on the property's Investment Value to the REIT and provide a reasoned "buy" or "no buy" recommendation based on your analysis.
You are an investment analyst and are expected to make your own tenable assumptions for key inputs where information is not provided (e.g., rental growth rates, inflation, exit yield, void periods). All assumptions must be explicitly stated and robustly justified by reference to your market research.
Beyond your independent assumptions, adhere to the following scenario: Securys Limited (occupying the fourth floor) will vacate at contractual lease expiry on 28 May 2029.
Assume a 12-month void, letting commission at 2% of the market rent for the first 5 years,
£3/ft² Tenant Improvement (TI) at lease start, and 6 months rent-free as incentive to attract a new tenant for the said unit.
Your report must be a professional document suitable for an investment committee. It should be structured as follows and should not exceed the 3,000-word limit for the main body, excluding tables and figures.
0.Front Cover and Contents Page:
-Your key findings, including a concise overview of the opportunity, the results of your financial analysis (NPV, IRR) and a clear and definitive investment recommendation.
-Property Overview: Location, physical characteristics, tenancy schedule analysis.
-Commentary on tenant profiles, lease events, voids and tenant incentives.
-Market Research: A concise analysis of local, regional, and national market trends relevant to the property sector. Justify the data and sources used (e.g., CoStar, EG Radius, ONS). This section must inform the assumptions used in your DCF model.
-Commentary on current market conditions and investor sentiment supported by transactional evidence.
-All quantitative inputs (yields, rents, growth, incentives, inflation) MUST be evidenced from verifiable sources (e.g., CoStar/EG Radius/ONS/BoE). AI outputs are not acceptable as sources of market data.
-Rationale and Basis of the Appraisal:
o Valuation Approach: Justify the use of the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method as the primary method for this investment valuation and investment.
o Basis of Valuation: Briefly explain the conceptual difference between Market Value (MV) and the Investment Value (IV) you are calculating for the REIT. Clarify which of these underpins your and advice to the REIT.
-Justification of Assumptions: Clearly state and justify all key inputs for your DCF model. This is a critical section of the report and must include your rationale for:
o Rental growth projections.
o Void periods and re-letting assumptions and costs.
o Operating expenditure (recoverable and non-recoverable).
o Exit Yield (with supporting comparable evidence).
o Discount Rate.
- Financing Structure & Impact: Detail the proposed financing structure and its impact on the investment (for the purpose of this assessment, you are to assume a 60% LTV, 25-year loan at a 6% fixed rate).
-Valuation and Performance Analysis:
-Risk Analysis: Conduct a sensitivity analysis to test how changes in your key assumptions (e.g., a +/- 0.5% change in exit yield or a +/- 1% change in rental growth) impact the NPV and IRR. Provide commentary on the key risks associated with the investment.
-Summarise the findings of your appraisal.
-Provide reasoned financial advice and a final recommendation to the REIT, clearly linking back to your analysis and the firm's investment objectives.
-All sources must be properly referenced in the NTU Harvard style.
-Supporting market evidence (e.g., comparable transaction details) and any other relevant information (all appended documents should be relevant to the task).
The above is an indicative layout and page allocation. The main body of your report should not exceed 3,000 words in total. Your appendices do not count towards this page limit.
It is imperative that you keep to the requirements set out by your client and that you do not exceed the valuation reporting length guidelines. You will need to use your professional judgement, the appropriate techniques and present information accurately and succinctly in your report to communicate the necessary information.
You must submit two separate files to the Dropbox:
-Your full report in Microsoft Word or PDF format.
-Your complete, dynamic 10-year proforma cash flow model in its original Microsoft Excel format (i.e., all formulae visible and functional; hard-coded values should be
avoided unless required by scenario). The Excel model must be organised and show all calculations.
Your coursework must be submitted electronically with the main report in Microsoft Word/PDF format and the Discounted Cash Flow Model in Microsoft Excel
The following assessment criteria will apply to this coursework. You should ensure that the work that you submit appropriately addresses and corresponds with these criteria.
|
Assessment Criteria |
Further Guidance |
|
1. Property & Market Analysis (20%): Quality of property overview. Depth of market research used to inform and justify assumptions. |
First (Excellent): Demonstrates an excellent and thorough knowledge and understanding of the subject property and the specific sub-market. Market research is comprehensive, current, and information is drawn from appropriate sources. There is a clear and robust link between the research presented and the key assumptions (e.g., rental growth, exit yield) adopted in the financial model. Upper Second (Very Good): Demonstrates a very good understanding of the property and the market context. Market research is relevant and detailed, with most key assumptions clearly justified by the evidence presented. Lower Second (Good): Provides a good, though sometimes descriptive, overview of the property and market. Some relevant research is evident, but it may lack depth, or the link between the research and the model's assumptions may not be fully justified. Third (Sufficient): A sufficient, but basic, description of the property is provided. Market research is limited, and the justification for key assumptions is weak or relies on generic statements. Fail (Insufficient): Little to no relevant market research is present. There is a fundamental lack of understanding of the property's context, and valuation assumptions are unsupported. |
|
2. DCF Proforma & Financial Modelling (30%): Accuracy, sophistication, and functionality of the 10-year Excel DCF model. Clear distinction between unlevered and levered cash flows. |
First (Excellent): The Excel model is technically excellent, dynamic, and free of errors. It clearly and accurately distinguishes between property-level (unlevered) and investor- level (levered) cash flows. The model is well-structured using industry best practices, easy to follow, and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of financial modelling principles. Upper Second (Very Good): The Excel model is accurate and functions correctly, with a clear separation of unlevered and levered analysis. It may have minor structural issues or lack the full sophistication of a 'First', but it is a very competent and robust financial model. Lower Second (Good): A good and functional DCF model is produced, but it may contain minor errors or lack clarity in some calculations. The distinction between unlevered and levered cash flows is present but not fully developed. Third (Sufficient): An acceptable and functional DCF model is produced, but has major structural flaws, inaccuracies, or is difficult to interpret. Key components like levered cash flows may be missing or incorrectly calculated. |
|
|
Fail (Insufficient): The submitted file is not a functional financial model, contains fundamental errors that invalidate the output, or is missing entirely. |
|
3. Valuation, Performance & Risk Analysis (30%): Accurate computation and interpretation of Investment Value, NPV, IRR, and other metrics. Thoroughness and depth of the risk and sensitivity analysis. |
First (Excellent): All required performance metrics (NPV, IRR, etc.) are accurately calculated for both unlevered and levered cash flows. The interpretation of these metrics is insightful and goes beyond simple definitions. The risk analysis is thorough, testing multiple key variables (scenario analysis) and providing an excellent commentary on the investment's risk profile and key value drivers. Upper Second (Very Good): All key metrics are calculated correctly with a very good interpretation. The sensitivity analysis is well-executed and covers the main variables, offering a clear understanding of the project's risks, though with less depth in the commentary. Lower Second (Good): Key performance metrics are calculated, though there may be minor errors or a simplistic interpretation. A sensitivity analysis is attempted, but may be limited in scope or lack a meaningful discussion of its implications. Third (Sufficient): Some metrics are calculated but may be incorrect or misinterpreted. The risk analysis is basic, only testing one variable, or it is missing a clear conclusion. Fail (Insufficient): Performance metrics are missing or fundamentally incorrect. There is no evidence of risk analysis being undertaken. |
|
4 Investment Advice & Conclusion (10%):
Quality and justification of the final investment recommendation. Ability to draw meaningful conclusions from the analytical findings. |
First (Excellent): The final investment recommendation is decisive, clear, and directly and persuasively justified by the results of the financial analysis and risk assessment. The advice is commercially aware and highly professional. Upper Second (Very Good): A clear recommendation is provided and is well-supported by the report's findings. The justification is strong, though it may lack the persuasive narrative of a 'First'. Lower Second (Good): A recommendation is made, but the link between it and the preceding financial analysis may be weak or not fully articulated. The conclusion is logical but lacks depth. Third (Sufficient): A recommendation is present but may be contradictory to the report's findings or lack any clear justification. Fail (Insufficient): No clear investment recommendation is made, or the advice provided is illogical and unsupported by any analysis in the report. |
|
5 Report Structure, Presentation & Professionalism (10%): Professional presentation, logical |
First (Excellent): The report is presented to a professional industry standard. It follows the required structure perfectly, the language is clear, formal, and concise, and there are no spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is excellent. Upper Second (Very Good): A very high standard of presentation is achieved. The report is well-structured and written, with only very minor presentational flaws. Referencing is to a very good standard. |
|
structure, clarity of written communication, |
Lower Second (Good): The report is clearly written and follows the required structure for the most part, but may have some issues with formatting, grammar, or flow. Referencing is adequate but may contain errors. |
|
adherence to referencing guidelines and references. |
Third (Sufficient): The report is understandable but may be poorly structured, contain numerous grammatical errors, or have an unprofessional appearance. Referencing may be inconsistent or incorrectly formatted. |
|
|
Fail (Insufficient): The report is poorly presented, difficult to read, |
|
|
and does not follow the required structure. There is a lack of |
|
|
professional care and attention. Referencing is absent or very poor. |
Achieve Higher Grades of PRMD30022 Coursework 1 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you a Nottingham Trent University student and need last-minute online assignment help with your PRMD30022 Investment Appraisal & Valuation Coursework 1 at NTU? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Finance Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment examples and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content